Hello,
I have some troubles understanding the way used by Gromacs in optimizing
the position of shells. In section 3.5.1 the manual says that the force on a
shell particle is decomposed into two terms. The first represents the
polarization and the second includes the Coulomb and van der Waals
Hi,
The equation you refer to is only an initial guess for the optimization.
The positions of the shells are optimized using the forces from
the full potential function.
Berk
> From: raf...@us.es
> To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
> Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 09:51:13 +0200
> Subject: [gmx-users] Shell dyn
--- On Mon, 8/6/09, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
From: Justin A. Lemkul
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] problem in running grompp
To: "Discussion list for GROMACS users"
Date: Monday, 8 June, 2009, 4:47 PM
Samik Bhattacharya wrote:
> hi
> i am simulating a membrane protein in POPC bilayer and for that
Samik Bhattacharya wrote:
Thank you Justin for the answar. but now how to solve it? where
should i make changes to correct that? pls let me know what to do...
waiting for your answar
Thank you again..
"CA" is not an alpha-carbon, it is a ffgmx atom type. So, therefore, y
Hi all,
probably this is a very trivial question: how can I find information in the
GROMACS site? I'm quite in trouble
because I'm trying to search for some information in the gmx-user archive, and
I can't reach it neither in the
old GROMACS site nor in the new one. I supposed I had to register t
Anna Marabotti wrote:
Hi all,
probably this is a very trivial question: how can I find information in the
GROMACS site? I'm quite in trouble
because I'm trying to search for some information in the gmx-user archive, and
I can't reach it neither in the
old GROMACS site nor in the new one. I su
On Tuesday 09 June 2009 10:02:47 Berk Hess wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The equation you refer to is only an initial guess for the optimization.
> The positions of the shells are optimized using the forces from
> the full potential function.
>
> Berk
>
> > From: raf...@us.es
> > To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
> > D
> From: raf...@us.es
> To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
> Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Shell dynamics with vdW terms.
> Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 16:29:39 +0200
>
> On Tuesday 09 June 2009 10:02:47 Berk Hess wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The equation you refer to is only an initial guess for the optimization.
> > Th
Dear all,
I am confused on the units of the eigenvalues calculated from g_covar
of mass-weighted covariance matrix. From the output, it says the unit is
"(nm\S2\N)" but from my understanding, it is supposed to be kg/m2.
Thanks for advance for any comments.
Regards,
Qin
___
Hey everyone,
I have a .pdb file that I need to convert to .gmx. The tricky thing is that
the protein has a lipid bound to the N-terminus, which pdb2gmx doesn't
recognize. The lipid is a myristic acid residue (14:0), and I haven't been
able to find it in any database. What would be the most stra
Gard Nelson wrote:
Hey everyone,
I have a .pdb file that I need to convert to .gmx. The tricky thing is
that the protein has a lipid bound to the N-terminus, which pdb2gmx
doesn't recognize. The lipid is a myristic acid residue (14:0), and I
haven't been able to find it in any database. W
Wang Qin wrote:
Dear all,
I am confused on the units of the eigenvalues calculated from
g_covar of mass-weighted covariance matrix. From the output, it says the
unit is "(nm\S2\N)" but from my understanding, it is supposed to be kg/m2.
Various of the GROMACS analysis tools don't write t
Hi,
> What might be even easier is to create an .itp file for myristic acid, so
> you can #include "myristic.itp" in any topology that needs it. That way you
> don't have to mess with .rtp files, or run pdb2gmx for every system that
> contains myristic acid.
But this doesn't help when it has to
On Tuesday 09 June 2009 18:27:16 Berk Hess wrote:
> > From: raf...@us.es
> > To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
> > Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Shell dynamics with vdW terms.
> > Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 16:29:39 +0200
> >
> > On Tuesday 09 June 2009 10:02:47 Berk Hess wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The equation yo
Hi,
Well, as has been pointed out before nm\S2\N stands for nm superscript
2 normal. That is correct for non mass-weigthed covariance analysis.
It's just fluctuation. Why would it be kg/m2 (kg/nm2) for mass
weighted? Look at the equations in the manual. It's
sqrt(mass)*sqrt(mass)*nm*nm, which make
15 matches
Mail list logo