Hi,
Sure, but the only other list worth searching is the developers list.
Rossen
Mark Abraham wrote:
Hi,
As far as I can see, the mailing list search page
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search only searching
gmx-users. While that's a good start, there's often information on th
Your second guess is correct! I used grompp to restart (I had thought it
might provide me with the chance to change things if needed). I was
surprised initially when "cat" command did not work! The number of frames
were most of the time less than what it should be.
I also checked the 'trjcat -h'. I
Paymon Pirzadeh wrote:
Sorry,
My command line was:
trjcat_d_mpi -f AFPI_Ih1010_54_58_Npt265_2.xtc
AFPI_Ih1010_54_58_Npt265_3.xtc AFPI_Ih1010_54_58_Npt265_4.xtc
AFPI_Ih1010_54_58_Npt265_5.xtc AFPI_Ih1010_54_58_Npt265_6.xtc -o
AFPI_Ih1010_54_58_Npt265_merged2-6.xtc
the "_d_mpi" is the suffix use
Sorry,
My command line was:
trjcat_d_mpi -f AFPI_Ih1010_54_58_Npt265_2.xtc
AFPI_Ih1010_54_58_Npt265_3.xtc AFPI_Ih1010_54_58_Npt265_4.xtc
AFPI_Ih1010_54_58_Npt265_5.xtc AFPI_Ih1010_54_58_Npt265_6.xtc -o
AFPI_Ih1010_54_58_Npt265_merged2-6.xtc
the "_d_mpi" is the suffix used for double precision an
Paymon Pirzadeh wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to concatenate several xtc files. When I use the trjcat, it
only writes the last file into the output file! where the problem could
be?
In your command line. Why didn't you tell us what it was? :-)
Mark
___
g
Hello,
I am trying to concatenate several xtc files. When I use the trjcat, it
only writes the last file into the output file! where the problem could
be?
Payman
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listin
Daniel Adriano Silva M wrote:
Mark,
Again me. I reinstalled things, you must be thinking that I am wrong
trying to get the icc installation to work, but as I stated on a
previous mail I get very good scaling and over 40% better performance
with icc than gcc. I had tested gmx_test, and all appear
Darrell Koskinen wrote:
Hi Justin,
Since I cannot use the original .tpr file, then do I need to run grompp
with the new index file to create a "new" .tpr file, "mdtopolnew.tpr"? I
assume I then need to modify the energygrps line within the .mdp file to
include these new energy groups and the
Hi Justin,
Since I cannot use the original .tpr file, then do I need to run grompp with the new index file to create a
"new" .tpr file, "mdtopolnew.tpr"? I assume I then need to modify the energygrps line
within the .mdp file to include these new energy groups and then execute "mdrun -rerun mdtr
Hi Mark,
By "missing", I meant zero by design. I found the initial opls paper in
which the H atom in ammonia is assigned a zero LJ parameter and the
entire LJ parameter for ammonia is assigned to the N atom.
I was just wondering if assigning the entire LJ parameter to the N atom
might affect
Mark,
Again me. I reinstalled things, you must be thinking that I am wrong
trying to get the icc installation to work, but as I stated on a
previous mail I get very good scaling and over 40% better performance
with icc than gcc. I had tested gmx_test, and all appears to be ok,
but I think the gmx
Darrell Koskinen wrote:
Hi Justin,
In my simulation, I have just over 100 ammonia molecules and, of these
molecules, 10 to 20 adsorb onto the graphene sheet. I initially thought
that I would need to tag each one of the ammonia molecules, since I
would not know, in advance of running the simul
Darrell Koskinen wrote:
Hi Justin,
In my simulation, I have just over 100 ammonia molecules and, of these
molecules, 10 to 20 adsorb onto the graphene sheet. I initially thought
that I would need to tag each one of the ammonia molecules, since I
would not know, in advance of running the sim
Hi Justin,
In my simulation, I have just over 100 ammonia molecules and, of these
molecules, 10 to 20 adsorb onto the graphene sheet. I initially thought
that I would need to tag each one of the ammonia molecules, since I
would not know, in advance of running the simulation, which of these
mo
Hi,
As far as I can see, the mailing list search page
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search only searching
gmx-users. While that's a good start, there's often information on the
other lists people might wish the option of searching for. Can we have
more of a user interface here,
Andrei Istrate wrote:
Hello all,
I would like to modify the force constant of some distance constraints during
my MD.
I know this is not implemented in GROMACS and I'd like to modify the code.
I have read that it could be done in md.c, but I didn't find the variable dr_fc in this file.
Why a
ms wrote:
Hi,
I am using g_mindist to see how close get C-alphas to each other in my
chains. What I do is selecting C-alpha two times when prompted. I have
only a quick question, just to be sure: The script doesn't take into
account the distance between *neighbouring C-alpha*, isn't it?
I d
Hello all,
I would like to modify the force constant of some distance constraints during
my MD.
I know this is not implemented in GROMACS and I'd like to modify the code.
I have read that it could be done in md.c, but I didn't find the variable dr_fc
in this file.
Tell me please what variable
Hi,
I am using g_mindist to see how close get C-alphas to each other in my
chains. What I do is selecting C-alpha two times when prompted. I have
only a quick question, just to be sure: The script doesn't take into
account the distance between *neighbouring C-alpha*, isn't it?
thanks!
m.
__
Francesco Pietra wrote:
I was asked to submit details of the procedure to get a solvated CG
system in order to see if help to correct the procedure is feasible.
Is the described procedure still insufficient?
thanks for answering
I posted several suggestions and some questions when you last po
Peng Yi wrote:
Thank for your reply! I have done some NVT runs per your suggestion, and
the results are similar to NPT runs, i.e., Gromacs results is more
affected by changing integration timestep than Lammps. Details below:
A melt of 240 octane chains by united-atom model. T=300K, V=55.46 nm
I was asked to submit details of the procedure to get a solvated CG
system in order to see if help to correct the procedure is feasible.
Is the described procedure still insufficient?
thanks for answering
francesco
-- Forwarded message --
From: Francesco Pietra
Date: Sun, Oct 25,
Thank for your reply! I have done some NVT runs per your suggestion, and
the results are similar to NPT runs, i.e., Gromacs results is more
affected by changing integration timestep than Lammps. Details below:
A melt of 240 octane chains by united-atom model. T=300K, V=55.46 nm^3.
Both Gromacs
leila karami wrote:
Hi
what is difference between input.gro and conf.gro files?
No clue. What are you doing?
-Justin
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
Hi
what is difference between input.gro and conf.gro files?
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/search before posting!
Please don't po
Rebeca García Fandiño wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to calculate the PMF of an ion with Gromacs 4. I have read
in the Gromacs list that the pull code had been completely rewritten in
the new version of Gromacs, but I cannot find much information about the
new way to use this.
Reading the manua
Hi,
I am trying to calculate the PMF of an ion with Gromacs 4. I have read in the
Gromacs list that the pull code had been completely rewritten in the new
version of Gromacs, but I cannot find much information about the new way to use
this.
Reading the manual (pag 280) I can see: “The option
Thank You Mark.
-- On Sun, 11/1/09, Mark Abraham wrote:
From: Mark Abraham
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Fw: help for installing gromacs with cpmd
To: "Discussion list for GROMACS users"
Date: Sunday, November 1, 2009, 4:59 PM
Farzad Molani wrote:
> Hi, Yes I read some articles and search in goog
Farzad Molani wrote:
Hi, Yes I read some articles and search in google but I couldn't get
enough information about that.
thanks.
There's nobody here being paid to guess what your problem is :-) There's
a page listed on google with explicit installation instructions. If you
have a specific pr
Hi, Yes I read some articles and search in google but I couldn't get enough
information about that.
thanks.
--- On Sun, 11/1/09, Mark Abraham wrote:
From: Mark Abraham
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Fw: help for installing gromacs with cpmd
To: "Discussion list for GROMACS users"
Date: Sunday, No
Farzad Molani wrote:
Hi.
I am going to install gromacs with cpmd but I do'nt know what do am I?
What do I need for installing?
what about EGO?
your sincereliy
Farzad
Did you start by searching the web?
http://www.google.com.au/search?q=cpmd+gromacs
Mark
Darrell Koskinen wrote:
Hi Justin,
Thanks for the suggestion. I looked through the GROMACS manual and the
only method I can see of obtaining the adsorption energy between an
adsorbed ammonia molecule and the graphene sheet would be to create an
index file that assigns a separate index for ea
Hi.
I am going to install gromacs with cpmd but I do'nt know what do am I?
What do I need for installing?
what about EGO?
your sincereliy
Farzad
___
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinf
pawan raghav wrote:
Dear all,
I am a new user of GROMACS and suffering from severe problem about
fftw-3.2.2 installation. Actually I have installed cygwin on windows XP
with gcc, gdb, and make packages rest all are leaved default. Now when I
have used configure command then it would give las
Dear all,
I am a new user of GROMACS and suffering from severe problem about
fftw-3.2.2 installation. Actually I have installed cygwin on windows XP with
gcc, gdb, and make packages rest all are leaved default. Now when I have
used configure command then it would give last line as
config.status:
Thank you.
Since i am using gromacs version 3.3.1 i facing the problem in getting
the trajectory output with the option -r
as given in the thread,
http://www.mail-archive.com/gmx-users@gromacs.org/msg01629.html
Is there any alternative way to solve the problem...
rama
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 12:43
Ramachandran G wrote:
Dear David,
Thank you for you help. It is very much helpful for me.
I have one more question. Is it possible to create index file for the
oxygen atom or water molecules alone exist in a hydration shell. Thank
you again.
Rama
You could try the trjorder program
O
Darrell Koskinen wrote:
Hi Mark,
I thought opls_127 and opls_128 were the representative atoms to use for
ammonia. Please correct me if I am wrong.
I don't know anything more than what's in ffoplsa* files or the papers.
Would the adsorption of the polar ammonia molecule onto the polar
(hydro
Dear David,
Thank you for you help. It is very much helpful for me.
I have one more question. Is it possible to create index file for the
oxygen atom or water molecules alone exist in a hydration shell. Thank
you again.
Rama
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 2:58 AM, David van der Spoel
wrote:
> Rama
39 matches
Mail list logo