Thanks a lot for the reply.
But I am getting different results with the two .tpr files (first and last)
using the following commands:
trjconv -s *first.tpr *-f test.xtc -o str.gro -dump 1 -pbc nojump
trjconv -s *last.tpr* -f test.xtc -o str.gro -dump 1 -pbc nojump
So which .tpr file shoul
On 4/12/2010 4:33 PM, Anirban Ghosh wrote:
Thanks a lot for the reply.
Actually I am running a protein in lipid bilayer. Now I want to
calculate the thickness of the bilayer at the end of the simulation.
So for that I want the last structure (.gro) file. So I am trying to
dump the last structure
Thanks a lot for the reply.
Actually I am running a protein in lipid bilayer. Now I want to
calculate the thickness of the bilayer at the end of the simulation.
So for that I want the last structure (.gro) file. So I am trying to
dump the last structure using trjconv (with -pbc option). So to do
th
mustafa bilsel wrote:
Hi,
I want to write the means of every 100 potential energies into an output
file.
Is there an option in Gromacs to do this?
No, but it should be a trivial exercise to take a data file (i.e., .xvg) that
contains this information and post-process it with the programmi
Hi,
I want to write the means of every 100 potential energies into an output
file.
Is there an option in Gromacs to do this?
Best wishes
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Supp
Yes, everyone knows why this happens. This question has been asked so often
that there is a FAQ on the Gromacs web-site:
http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Terminology/Periodic_Boundary_Conditions
Best wishes
Andreas
---
From: gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org [mailto:gmx-us
Rocco Caliandro wrote:
Hi everybody,
I found a discrepancy in the sasa calculation
between gromacs versions 4.0.2 and 4.5.1.
For a trajectory generated by gmx 4.0.2. with AMBER force fiels,
I calculated the sasa values by using the g_sas module taken
from gromacs 4.0.2 (a) and gromacs 4.5
Hi everybody,
I found a discrepancy in the sasa calculation
between gromacs versions 4.0.2 and 4.5.1.
For a trajectory generated by gmx 4.0.2. with AMBER force fiels,
I calculated the sasa values by using the g_sas module taken
from gromacs 4.0.2 (a) and gromacs 4.5.1 (b).
I list the results
Anirban Ghosh wrote:
Thanks a lot Justin for the reply. Yes, I understand that. But ideally
which structure should be used as the reference, in a general, the
starting structure or the end structure?
That's up to you to decide based on what you need to measure. Do you want the
RMSD relativ
Dear David:
Thanks a lot for your reply. You are absolutely right! All the charges
in the tpr file is zero now.
This does not make much sense to me though, as the group I selected
with "tpbconv" does not include all the atoms. I also tried to use
other groups such as POPC or Protein and n
Thanks a lot Justin for the reply. Yes, I understand that. But ideally which
structure should be used as the reference, in a general, the starting
structure or the end structure?
like when I an using trjconv to dump my last frame (with "-pbc nojump"),
which .tpr file should I use to get the exact p
Please file a bugzilla, uploading all of the input files needed to reproduce the
problem. It appears that you can cause LP2 to be assigned an LP type if it is
the first line in atomtypes.atp, but the mass and charge are still nonsense.
Certainly you can manually modify the topology to fix thi
Gromacs version used was 4.5.3. I have added the new atomtype LP in the
atomtype.atp and I have also defined the nonbonded+bonded interactions for
LP. Parameters for LP were obtained from *Dixon.et.al J.Comp.Chem, 18,
1632-1646*
*atomtypes.atp entry---*
LP 3.0
Sarath Chandra wrote:
Dear Gromacs users,
I have a nitroxide radical with lone pairs on oxygen which has to be
attached to Adenine of a RNA. I have the forcefiled for the nitroxide
radical and as well as i have obtained the charges for the link atoms
using resp. I use specbond.dat to make
Dear Gromacs users,
I have a nitroxide radical with lone pairs on oxygen which has to be
attached to Adenine of a RNA. I have the forcefiled for the nitroxide
radical and as well as i have obtained the charges for the link atoms using
resp. I use specbond.dat to make the link between the nucleoti
Anirban Ghosh wrote:
Hi ALL,
Its a very basic question but still...
When we calculate RMSD (or any other parameter) using the g_rms command,
we need to supply the .tpr file with -s option. Now suppose if I have a
total 20 ns simulation with 4 breaks (i.e 5 ns in each run), then there
will b
Hi ALL,
Its a very basic question but still...
When we calculate RMSD (or any other parameter) using the g_rms command, we
need to supply the .tpr file with -s option. Now suppose if I have a total
20 ns simulation with 4 breaks (i.e 5 ns in each run), then there will be 4
.tpr files. So at the en
gromacs wrote:
Hi users:
I run pure water MD. I need to run different water models. How can i get
spce.gro, which means how can i get .gro of spce water?
How can i get .gro of TIP4P?
The answer to both of these questions can be found here:
http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/How-tos/
גדעון לפידות wrote:
Hi all,
I have been running nano second long simulations using Gromacs 4.0.7 and
connecting them to create a long time period. on the last run the
protein "jumped" out of the water box (the output files were viewed
using VMD) does anyone know why this could have happened?
Hi all,
I have been running nano second long simulations using Gromacs 4.0.7 and
connecting them to create a long time period. on the last run the protein
"jumped" out of the water box (the output files were viewed using VMD) does
anyone know why this could have happened?
Thanks, Gideon
--
gmx-use
Javier
is your system a pure lipid bilayer + solvent or is there anything else
(protein, peptides, etc)?
Cheers
Ángel.
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 00:42 +0100, Javier Cerezo wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I think that these arguments are given for short-time diffusion (D1).
> But at larger times all MSD curves
Hi Erik,
I think also I can try proton-proton transfer with gromacs later when it
will be implemented.
best,
Olga
2010/12/2 Erik Marklund
> Olga Ivchenko skrev 2010-12-02 13.30:
>
> Dear gromacs users,
>>
>> I want to simulate proton transfer between water and another small
>> molecule in grom
22 matches
Mail list logo