On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Albert wrote:
> Dear:
>
>I use g_tune_pme for MD production but it clashed before the job
> finished since it is over cluster walltime limitation. I get the
> following information from perf.out:
>
> mpirun -np 144 mdrun -npme -1 -s tuned.tpr -v -o md.trr -c m
On 8/24/12 10:48 AM, Shima Arasteh wrote:
Hi,
I am doing the simulation of kalp15 in DPPC following the Justin's tutorial.
In the " 2. Pack the lipids around the protein "step, to get the correct area
per lipid, I enter these commands:
#perl inflategro.pl system.gro 4 DPPC 14 system_in
Dear:
I use g_tune_pme for MD production but it clashed before the job
finished since it is over cluster walltime limitation. I get the
following information from perf.out:
mpirun -np 144 mdrun -npme -1 -s tuned.tpr -v -o md.trr -c md.gro -e
md.edr -g md.log
I am just wondering, is it co
Dear Gromacs users,
I am trying to get a full understanding of how the energy of
electrostatics and VDW interactions are calculated in Gromacs, but I am
not sure I have the right picture in mind. Could someone let me know if
the procedure below is correct?
So, let's say I have a PDB file, an
Thanks for this!
Steven
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Thomas Schlesier wrote:
> As a first step, i would shift all curves so, that the energy of the minium
> is for all plots at the same (aribarity) value. The minimum should be the
> point which has sampled the best. If you shift then all val
Because it uses the atom index, which is most likely NOT the same as your
processed file will not contain certain hydrogens, which are present in A.pdb.
24 aug 2012 kl. 16.33 skrev Hsinlin:
> Thank you for your reply.
> I checked the coordinates of all C-alpha atoms between two .pdb files.
> The
Hi, David-
Perhaps we can work with you to compare the internal g_bar
implementation with our external BAR and MBAR implementation run from
the .dhdl.xvg data output in 4.6. It would probably be easier to run
these calculations after the optimization updates are added in the
next few days(?), but
Hi,
I am doing the simulation of kalp15 in DPPC following the Justin's tutorial.
In the " 2. Pack the lipids around the protein "step, to get the correct area
per lipid, I enter these commands:
#perl inflategro.pl system.gro 4 DPPC 14 system_inflated.gro 5 area.dat
Updating the .top fil
Thank you for your reply.
I checked the coordinates of all C-alpha atoms between two .pdb files.
They are exactly the same.
So I don't understand why g_rms(g_rmsdist) selecting group C-alpha give me
high values.
Sincerely yours,
Hsin-Lin
Erik Marklund wrote
>
> Hi,
>
> Since gromos-forcefields
--
View this message in context:
http://gromacs.5086.n6.nabble.com/g-rms-and-g-rmsdist-on-initial-structure-tp5000492p5000495.html
Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo
As a first step, i would shift all curves so, that the energy of the
minium is for all plots at the same (aribarity) value. The minimum
should be the point which has sampled the best. If you shift then all
values, it should be easier to spot differences between the plots.
And probably make the
Hi,
Since gromos-forcefields are not strictly all-atom forcefields, there might be
a mismatch between atoms in the two structures.
Best,
Erik
24 aug 2012 kl. 15.35 skrev Hsin-Lin Chiang:
> Hi,
>
> For example, I have a A.pdb as a initial structure file.
> And I just used pdb2gmx on it to gen
Hi,
For example, I have a A.pdb as a initial structure file.
And I just used pdb2gmx on it to generate another B.pdb file with
GROMOS96 43a1 as its force filed.
Then I select C-alpha atoms to calculate RMSD.
echo 3 | g_rms -f B.pdb -s A.pdb
I suppose the RMSD value should be 0, but the value is
Hi
I asked a similar question a year ago about implementing CMAP in FEP
calculations for gromacs 4.5.4. At the time I could not get the simulation to
run with CMAP as it came up with:
Fatal error:
> Function type CMAP Dih. not implemented in ip_pert
Helpfully, Mark suggested a modification to t
Hi,
we have terrible problems to get reasonable results from BAR free energy
calculations. We basically follow Justin's tutorial for solvation of
methanol, ethanol, diethyl-ether and neopentane in water using OPLS but
get very strange results. The free energy curves are here:
http://folding.
I did g_wham calculation as you suggested for:
10-30 ns
30-50 ns
10-50 ns
In some cases of PMF curves the drift is 0.3 kcal/mol but in some
cases it is over 1.5 kcal/mol so huge drifts. In terms of huge drifts
what would you suggest ?
Steven
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
Dear Justin,
I just tried running it using one node with 12 cores, and it's been
completed successfully within a short time!
Yes you are right, the system is under reparation and this probably causes
those problems.
I'm really grateful for your and Vitaly's help. Thank you very much!!!
Clare
On 8/24/12 6:01 AM, Clare wrote:
Dear Vitaly,
Thank you so much for your suggestion!!
I've run the simultion using one core as you suggested, and I can see two
outputs on step 0 and step 100 now ( shown on the bottom), but it still took
a while to only generate these two outputs.
Maybe it is i
Dear Vitaly,
Thank you so much for your suggestion!!
I've run the simultion using one core as you suggested, and I can see two
outputs on step 0 and step 100 now ( shown on the bottom), but it still took
a while to only generate these two outputs.
Maybe it is indeed the problem of scaling as menti
Am 23.08.2012 23:11, schrieb gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org:
hello :
>
>I am a little bit confused about the difference between gen_seed and
>ld_seed. I checked the manual, it is said:
>
>gen_seed
>used to initialize random generator for random velocities, when gen_seed
>is set to -1, the seed
Gromacs-4.5.5 is built on GPU with OpenMM-4.1.1 binary package. But
the standard gromacs gpu benchmark - dhfr failed with "Floating point
exception".
The benchmark name is : dhfr/GPU/dhfr-impl-1nm.bench
Error Output:
Reading file topol.tpr, VERSION 4.5.1-dev-20100917-b1d66 (single precision)
W
21 matches
Mail list logo