[gmx-users] Protein in vacum

2013-01-28 Thread Shima Arasteh
Dear users, I have done simulation with my protein in water earlier successfully. Now, I am trying to simulate protein in vacum similar to the last simulation of protein-water. When I go to the NPT equilibration, I get a fatal error. The commands I ran: 1.pdb2gmx -f monomer.pdb -o monomer.gro 

[gmx-users] Protein in vacum

2013-01-28 Thread Shima Arasteh
Dear users, I have done simulation with my protein in water earlier successfully using CHARMM36 FF. Now, I am trying to simulate protein in vacum similar to the last simulation of protein-water. When I go to the NPT equilibration, I get a fatal error. The commands I ran: 1.pdb2gmx -f

[gmx-users] Protein in vacum

2013-01-28 Thread Shima Arasteh
Dear users, I have done simulation with my protein in water earlier successfully using CHARMM36 FF. Now, I am trying to simulate protein in vacum similar to the last simulation of protein-water. When I go to the NPT equilibration, I get a fatal error. The commands I ran: 1.pdb2gmx -f

Re: [gmx-users] Inquiry about a completely user defined force field

2013-01-28 Thread Mark Abraham
There's nothing that leaps out at me as being wrong - but syntax checking is the job of the parser (grompp) and logic checking can only be done by you. To do that, I would proceed slowly, demonstrating that small chunks of the force field can be used to generate results you can validate against

Re: [gmx-users] Fatal error: Number of atoms in Topology is not the same as in Trajectory

2013-01-28 Thread Mark Abraham
http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Terminology/Blowing_Up contains the ideas that will likely help you, e.g. smaller time step, more equilibration-friendly pressure coupling. Mark On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Shima Arasteh shima_arasteh2...@yahoo.comwrote: It is 15 ns of NPT

Re: [gmx-users] Steepest Descents converged to machine precision in 7559 steps, but did not reach the requested Fmax 100.

2013-01-28 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 1/27/13 11:53 PM, Ewaru wrote: Dear Gromacs experts, I am running gromacs for the first time, and this is my em.mdp file. define = -DFLEXIBLE constraints = none integrator = steep dt = 0.01 ; ps ! nstlist = 10 ns_type = grid rlist = 1.0 coulombtype = PME rcoulomb = 1.0 vdwtype = cut-off

Re: [gmx-users] Decreasing of the box size during membrane protein simulation

2013-01-28 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 1/28/13 2:45 AM, James Starlight wrote: Dear Gromacs Users! I'm simulating membrane receptor embedded in the explicit membrane using charmm36 ff. My simulation setup consist of ; Compound#mols Protein 1 iso 1 POPC 228 SOL 11713 NA

Re: [gmx-users] Protein in vacum

2013-01-28 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 1/28/13 4:47 AM, Shima Arasteh wrote: Dear users, I have done simulation with my protein in water earlier successfully using CHARMM36 FF. Now, I am trying to simulate protein in vacum similar to the last simulation of protein-water. When I go to the NPT equilibration, I get a fatal

Re: [gmx-users] Re: Protein in vacum

2013-01-28 Thread Shima Arasteh
Am I supposed to skip this step? Thanks for your reply. Sincerely, Shima ___ From: Dr. Vitaly Chaban vvcha...@gmail.com To: gmx-us...@gromuracs.org Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 3:17 PM Subject: [gmx-users] Re: Protein in vacum Dear users, I have done

Re: [gmx-users] Re: Protein in vacum

2013-01-28 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 1/28/13 6:51 AM, Shima Arasteh wrote: Am I supposed to skip this step? Do not be tempted to think that there is a standard or required workflow. The ensembles and environments you choose are dependent upon the task at hand. There may be common workflows for proteins in water, but

Re: [gmx-users] Re: Protein in vacum

2013-01-28 Thread Dr. Vitaly Chaban
YES. On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Shima Arasteh shima_arasteh2...@yahoo.com wrote: Am I supposed to skip this step? Thanks for your reply. Sincerely, Shima ___ From: Dr. Vitaly Chaban vvcha...@gmail.com To: gmx-us...@gromuracs.org Sent: Monday,

Re: [gmx-users] Installation_gromacs_4.5.5_in fedra15_help

2013-01-28 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 1/28/13 7:52 AM, Devika N T wrote: Dear all Can someone refer me a link to follow installation of gromacs 4.5.5 in Fedora 15 ( fc15.x86_64) http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Installation_Instructions_4.5 -Justin -- Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.

Re: [gmx-users] Decreasing of the box size during membrane protein simulation

2013-01-28 Thread James Starlight
Justin, Below you can see graph representation of my system after energy minimisation ( that case system was filled up with tip3p water using genbox with slightly increased vdw for C atom ( to 2nm) to prevent water movement into the membrane.

Re: [gmx-users] Decreasing of the box size during membrane protein simulation

2013-01-28 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 1/28/13 8:30 AM, James Starlight wrote: Justin, Below you can see graph representation of my system after energy minimisation ( that case system was filled up with tip3p water using genbox with slightly increased vdw for C atom ( to 2nm) to prevent I'm assuming you mean 2 Angstrom?

Re: [gmx-users] Decreasing of the box size during membrane protein simulation

2013-01-28 Thread James Starlight
Justin, yes, 2 A for C atoms. The dims are 8.68740 8.41864 10.0 James 2013/1/28 Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu: On 1/28/13 8:30 AM, James Starlight wrote: Justin, Below you can see graph representation of my system after energy minimisation ( that case system was filled up with

Re: [gmx-users] Decreasing of the box size during membrane protein simulation

2013-01-28 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 1/28/13 8:45 AM, James Starlight wrote: Justin, yes, 2 A for C atoms. The dims are 8.68740 8.41864 10.0 Well, with such a dramatic change, it should be fairly easy to simply watch the trajectory and see what went wrong. -Justin --

Re: [gmx-users] Visualize Protein ligand complex after simulation

2013-01-28 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 1/28/13 9:30 AM, Sainitin Donakonda wrote: Hello, Recently i started working on molecular dynamics on my protein ligand complex using gromacs i successfully did simulation but i dont know how to visualize this protein-ligand complex this after MD simulation Can any body tell me how to do

Re: [gmx-users] PMF and Histograms

2013-01-28 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 1/28/13 9:00 AM, Steven Neumann wrote: Dear Gmx Users, Dear Justin, I run umbrella samplig with small molecule binding protein. With 11 windows and 0.2 nm spacing I got: PMF: http://speedy.sh/zevcp/profile.JPG Hisotogram: http://speedy.sh/8Cua2/histo.JPG (I used -min and -max options

Re: [gmx-users] Visualize Protein ligand complex after simulation

2013-01-28 Thread Erik Marklund
Short answer is to inspect your complex with VMD or Pymol (or some other viewer). Pymol takes pdb input, so unless your structure is contained in a pdb file you must convert it with e.g. trjconv first. If you want a single frame you need to extract one form your trajectory, or, if the

Re: [gmx-users] error about pbc

2013-01-28 Thread Kieu Thu Nguyen
I reduced time step in equi.mdp file to 20 ps. But the system is still not balance. Should i continue reduce time step below 20 ps value ? Thanks so much for any suggestion about appropriate time step value ! Regards, KT On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Kieu Thu Nguyen

Re: [gmx-users] boundwaters

2013-01-28 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 1/28/13 10:02 AM, shahid nayeem wrote: Dear Users I am interested in knowing only the water molecules which remains bounded to the protein during MD. Using g_select I can make a boundwater.ndx file which gives water molecules within a specified distance from the protein but it gives

Re: [gmx-users] error about pbc

2013-01-28 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 1/28/13 10:29 AM, Kieu Thu Nguyen wrote: I reduced time step in equi.mdp file to 20 ps. But the system is still not balance. Should i continue reduce time step below 20 ps value ? Thanks so much for any suggestion about appropriate time step value ! The first step I would take is to keep

Re: [gmx-users] boundwaters

2013-01-28 Thread shahid nayeem
Hi Justin If I use the boundwaters.ndx to write another .ndx file using 1 2 3 4 and so on over all snapshots then also I should get the common water molecules in these snapshots. Am I right. Shahid On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote: On 1/28/13 10:02 AM,

Re: [gmx-users] boundwaters

2013-01-28 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 1/28/13 10:53 AM, shahid nayeem wrote: Hi Justin If I use the boundwaters.ndx to write another .ndx file using 1 2 3 4 and so on over all snapshots then also I should get the common water molecules in these snapshots. Am I right. Presumably. Probably faster to try it and see rather

[gmx-users] problem in distance restraint

2013-01-28 Thread Masomeh Dehghani
Dear users    I have 6 water molecules ,I want to constraint the distance between 6 oxygen  atoms in 0.42 nm  from together.I read GROMACS manual but I had fatal erorr.   Here there is  disres.itp file:   ; Include Distance restraints file #ifdef DDISRES #endif [ distance_restraints ] ;ai aj 

Re: [gmx-users] problem in distance restraint

2013-01-28 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 1/28/13 2:10 PM, Masomeh Dehghani wrote: Dear users I have 6 water molecules ,I want to constraint the distance between 6 oxygen atoms in 0.42 nm from together.I read GROMACS manual but I had fatal erorr. Here there is disres.itp file: ; Include Distance restraints file #ifdef

[gmx-users] structure factor

2013-01-28 Thread Juliette N.
Dear all, I am trying to calculate structure factor or scattering density of a polymer in solution. The only tool I know is g_rdf -f .trr -s tpr. -sq -n index I provide an index file with System, Polymer (atom numbers of all polymers) and Solvent (all solvent molecules) groups. -startq

Re: [gmx-users] structure factor

2013-01-28 Thread Alexey Shvetsov
Hello, В письме от 28 января 2013 16:06:20 пользователь Juliette N. написал: Dear all, I am trying to calculate structure factor or scattering density of a polymer in solution. The only tool I know is g_rdf -f .trr -s tpr. -sq -n index g_rdf can calculate SAXS structurefactor g_sans can

Re: [gmx-users] Decreasing of the box size during membrane protein simulation

2013-01-28 Thread James Starlight
Its intresting that on the same system which was equilibrated longer the decrease on the Z dim was smaller (from 10 to 9nm). By the way does it possible to simulate membrane proteins (with explicit membrane) in the nvt enssemble without explicit barostat ? What options in the mdp should be added

[gmx-users] Analysing of the trajectory using editconf

2013-01-28 Thread James Starlight
Dear Gromac's users! I have long trajectory with small intervals between individual time-steps. Using editconf I'd like: 1- To extract last frame in pdb from my trajectory (e.g for extraction of the first frame I'm using but its not working with -dump -1 ) 2- To convert my trajectory into xtc

[gmx-users] REG: grompp comment

2013-01-28 Thread Subramaniam Boopathi
Dear sir, i have successfully created .gro file after neccessary correction made in .rtp file. In the grompp_d comment, i am facing following errror. could how can i rectify this error. my comment is ./grompp_d -f em.mdp -c abnic2.gro -p abnic.top -o abnic2.tpr WARNING 1 [file

RE: [gmx-users] REG: grompp comment

2013-01-28 Thread Emanuel Birru
Hello Subramaniam, For Unknown left-hand 'coloumbtype' in parameter file There is type in you em.mdp file. Hence, change 'coloumbtype' to the correct spelling 'rcoulomb' The errors are generated as you are using non default bond types in your 'abnic_Other.itp' so check the bond type in

Re: [gmx-users] Decreasing of the box size during membrane protein simulation

2013-01-28 Thread James Starlight
One important point: in that simulations I've used decreased cut-offs with charmm36 ff because that systems have been modelled with CPU+GPU so I had some imbalance in cpu\gpu loadings with common (1.2) cutoffs. rlist = 0.8 ; Cut-off for making neighbor list (short range