Dear Justin
I study your tutorial ( KALP15 in DPPC).
You had said Convert the dppc128.pdb to .gro format with editconf and
remove the initial periodicity.
Which of following lines shows removal of the initial periodicity:
1) editconf -f dppc128.pdb -o dppc128.gro
2) editconf -f dppc128.pdb -o
Dear Justin
Excuse me for my previous question. I should use trjconv to remove initial
periodicity. But I have another problem: when I use
editconf -f dppc128.pdb -o dppc128.gro
I encounter with
Fatal error:
Unknown atomtype OW
I did all steps based on tutorial. What is the problem?
Best
Excuse me.
when I use
grompp -f minim.mdp -c dppc128.gro -p topol_dppc.top -o em.tpr
I encounter with
Fatal error:
Unknown atomtype OW
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at
On 6/22/13 8:59 AM, Andrew Bostick wrote:
Excuse me.
when I use
grompp -f minim.mdp -c dppc128.gro -p topol_dppc.top -o em.tpr
I encounter with
Fatal error:
Unknown atomtype OW
Apparently something has gone wrong when editing the force field files. I don't
know what would have led you
Hello,
I am assembling a GPU workstation to run MD simulations, and I was wondering if
anyone has any recommendation regarding the GPU/CPU combination.
From what I can see, the GTX690 could be the best bang for my buck in terms of
number of cores, memory, clock rate. But being a dual GPU card,
On 22.06.2013 17:31, Mare Libero wrote:
I am assembling a GPU workstation to run MD simulations, and I was wondering if
anyone has any recommendation regarding the GPU/CPU combination.
From what I can see, the GTX690 could be the best bang for my buck in terms of
number of cores, memory,
On 22.06.2013 22:18, Mare Libero wrote:
The vendor I contacted was pushing for one of the
high end i7 processors with hyper-threading. But from what I can read,
most of the MD software don't make any use of it. So, using a the
multi-cores AMD (like your FX-8350) can be a cheaper and more
Hi Justin,
Thank you for sharing your experience with me.
As suggested, Gromacs ver 4.5.5 is compiled within the same Linux box
and I am able to reproduce a similar result ( DG= -9.30 kJmol-1).
Gromacs ver 4.5.5 and 4.6.2 both are compiled from source codes, while
Gromacs ver 4.5.7 as
8 matches
Mail list logo