[gmx-users] Invalid order for directive atomtypes

2013-08-03 Thread Jonathan Saboury
PDB file used :http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore.do?structureId=1cx2 Commands used: http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=YYG5ad7A Compressed folder containing all files (10.2 MB): http://www.sendspace.com/file/rka8ei So I want to simulate this complex. I am having problems with the .itp's and do not know w

[gmx-users] mixing of PCs for generating reduced free energy profile using g_sham

2013-08-03 Thread R.S.K.Vijayan
Hi Gromacs user community a) I was wondering if it is possible to mix a common pair of PCs from two simulations (say, PC1 from a bound simulation vs PC1 from unbound simulation or for that matter wild vs mutant) as an reaction coordinates to generate a comparative reduced free energy profile u

Re: [gmx-users] Re: restraint-lambdas for position restraints in hamiltonian exchange

2013-08-03 Thread Michael Shirts
That is correct. Such a functionality wouldn't be that hard to implement - but there are a long list of easy functionalities to be implemented. You can submit a request to redmine.gromacs.org so that the request is archived. On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Dejun Lin wrote: > So I take it that in

[gmx-users] Re: restraint-lambdas for position restraints in hamiltonian exchange

2013-08-03 Thread Dejun Lin
So I take it that in the position restraint case (not COM-pulling), where the reference positions are determined by the starting structure instead of a B-state topology, the reference positions won't be swapped ? 2013/8/3 Michael Shirts-2 [via GROMACS] < ml-node+s5086n5010324...@n6.nabble.com> >

Re: [gmx-users] restraint-lambdas for position restraints in hamiltonian exchange

2013-08-03 Thread Michael Shirts
Short answer is anything that has a B state parameter can be included in in Hamiltonian exchange. If it's pull code or explicit restraints, it's controlled by restraint lambda. > I went through the manual and couldn't find any definite answers to the > following questions. > > First, I wonder if

[gmx-users] Gromacs 4.6.3 installation Issue with Intel & CUDA

2013-08-03 Thread Jim Strong
Hello, I have a problem compiling Gromacs 4.6.3 on RHEL 6.4 x64 with permutations of the following programs: Intel 13.1.0 CUDA 5.5 OpenMPI 1.7.2 Cmake 2.8.11.2 FFTW 3.3.3 (or Intel MKL) GNU 4.8.1 Basically, once the Intel compiler is introduced into the picture, NVCC seems to fail: ---