Hi Prof. Shirts,
I am sure that I speak for a lot of GROMACS users when I say that I want to
attend the workshop, but I cannot. I would be willing to pay the whole
workshop fee (and more) if you could kindly video the whole workshop and
make it available to us. Thank you.
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at
Dear GROMACS users-
I'd like to remind you all about the 2013 GROMACS USA Workshop and
Conference at the University of Virginia Sept 13th-15th. There are
still registration slots available, but the early registration
deadline of Aug 22nd is coming up in just a few days; after the 22nd,
the regist
Interestingly, removing position restraints does not have much of an impact.
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
>
>
> On 8/19/13 11:58 AM, HANNIBAL LECTER wrote:
>
>> I usually use 1.0 for my systems and I get the correct values for the
>> temperatures. If I couple it as a sy
On 8/19/13 4:56 PM, sudipta wrote:
Basically, few litterateurs suggested that the electric field generates a
stable water pore inside a membrane. I am motivated by that fact and try to
create a water pore for my system.
I found few litterateurs on this topic. However, I am based on a protocol
Basically, few litterateurs suggested that the electric field generates a
stable water pore inside a membrane. I am motivated by that fact and try to
create a water pore for my system.
I found few litterateurs on this topic. However, I am based on a protocol
as suggested by Marrinik et al (plos co
On 8/19/13 4:35 PM, Abed Askari wrote:
thank you for your reply.
because without the position restraint the cylindrical shape of my molecule
(CNT)
changes. is it reasonble to use umbrella sampling along with the position
restraint in
y and z directions?
Possibly, but it sounds more lik
thank you for your reply.
because without the position restraint the cylindrical shape of my molecule
(CNT)
changes. is it reasonble to use umbrella sampling along with the position
restraint in
y and z directions?
- Original Message -
From: Justin Lemkul
To: Abed Askari ; Discussi
On 8/19/13 3:15 PM, sudipta wrote:
Thanks for your reply. Is that means my electric field is too high? Should
I reduce the strength of electric field? Which value is suitable for the
electric field? Is my protocol for controlling area and application of
The answers here all depend on what you
On 8/19/13 4:03 PM, Abed Askari wrote:
Dear gmx-users
I want to use umbrella sampling to calculate the PMF between
two molecules and x-axis is the reaction coordinate. would you please
tell me I can use position restraint in y and z directions for the pulling
group or not?
Why would you
Dear gmx-users
I want to use umbrella sampling to calculate the PMF between
two molecules and x-axis is the reaction coordinate. would you please
tell me I can use position restraint in y and z directions for the pulling
group or not?
any help would be appreciated.
--
gmx-users mailing list
ear gmx-users
I want to use umbrella sampling to calculate the PMF between
two molecules and x-axis is the reaction coordinate. would you please
tell me I can use position restraint in y and z directions for the pulling
group or not?
any help would be appreciated.
--
gmx-users mailing list
Thanks for your reply. Is that means my electric field is too high? Should
I reduce the strength of electric field? Which value is suitable for the
electric field? Is my protocol for controlling area and application of
electric field across the membrane fine. By the way I had modeled my
system usi
On 8/19/13 12:27 PM, Za Pour wrote:
Dear gmx-users
Iwould like to calculate the PMF between two nanotubes covered
with some molecules. To do that, one nanotube has to be held fixedly and
another one
is supposed to be moved as a rigid entity. To generate configurations, for
fixed nanotube
On 8/19/13 1:02 PM, sudipta wrote:
I am coming across the similar problem. In my case I was using
semiisotropic pressure and set the compressiblity in x/y as 0.0 to
construct the NPAT ensemble. The area in xy plane is not changing but the
dimension of z has changed. The system behaves well with
On 8/19/13 11:58 AM, HANNIBAL LECTER wrote:
I usually use 1.0 for my systems and I get the correct values for the
temperatures. If I couple it as a system, the low T-CNT yields a different
value than the target 300K.
What about changing the integrator to md? What happens if you remove restr
I am coming across the similar problem. In my case I was using
semiisotropic pressure and set the compressiblity in x/y as 0.0 to
construct the NPAT ensemble. The area in xy plane is not changing but the
dimension of z has changed. The system behaves well without the application
of electric field o
Hi Grita,
Yes it is. You need to re-compile a GPU version of Gromacs from source
codes. You also need to use Verlet cutoff-scheme. That is, place a new
line like
cutoff-scheme = Verlet
in your mdp file.
Finally, run the GPU version of mdrun, adding a parameter -gpu_id 0if
you have o
Dear gmx-users
Iwould like to calculate the PMF between two nanotubes covered
with some molecules. To do that, one nanotube has to be held fixedly and
another one
is supposed to be moved as a rigid entity. To generate configurations, for
fixed nanotube
I used
position restraints in all direc
I usually use 1.0 for my systems and I get the correct values for the
temperatures. If I couple it as a system, the low T-CNT yields a different
value than the target 300K.
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
>
>
> On 8/19/13 11:42 AM, HANNIBAL LECTER wrote:
>
>> Thanks Justi
On 8/19/13 11:42 AM, HANNIBAL LECTER wrote:
Thanks Justin.
I am not sure how it is fundamentally incompatible. Especially with
refcoord-scaling = com. Can you please provide with some more input on that?
The refcoord-scaling option doesn't matter with frozen groups. Anything that is
froze
I am performing NPT here but this artifact is independent of whether one is
using NPT or NVT.
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:42 AM, HANNIBAL LECTER <
hanniballecte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Justin.
>
> I am not sure how it is fundamentally incompatible. Especially with
> refcoord-scaling = com.
This is a known issue (e.g. http://bugzilla.gromacs.org/issues/1021).
I have literally no idea if CUDA is even available for this hardware.
You do have the option of cmake -DGMX_CPU_ACCELERATION=SSE4.1, which
might be imperceptibly slower than AVX given the use of a GPU.
There are rumours of OpenM
Thanks Justin.
I am not sure how it is fundamentally incompatible. Especially with
refcoord-scaling = com. Can you please provide with some more input on that?
The outputs are from g_energy.
Here is the .mdp file.
define = -DPOSRES_CNT
constraints = all-bonds
pbc
On 8/19/13 11:32 AM, HANNIBAL LECTER wrote:
Hi,
I have been performing NPT simulations with CNT, Protein and water.
However, when I freeze the CNT, the system crashes with segmentation fault.
That is to be expected. Frozen atoms and pressure coupling are fundamentally
incompatible.
If
Dear All,
I am trying to install Gromacs 4.6.3 in my Macbook pro retina with 10.8.
It has a GPU (NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M 1024 MB).
I got really hopeful to use the GPU and the i7 (threaded 8 cores) for
calculations.
But I am finding it difficult to install Gromacs
.
Mac osx 10.8 comes with cla
Hi,
I have been performing NPT simulations with CNT, Protein and water.
However, when I freeze the CNT, the system crashes with segmentation fault.
If I use position restraints, the temperature of the system is lower than
what it is expected to be. I am using sd coupling.
If I couple the protein
Okay, clearer now. Will see what I can do. Thanks a lot for your help.
Massimo
2013/8/19 Justin Lemkul
>
>
> On 8/19/13 10:22 AM, massimo sandal wrote:
>
>> 2013/8/19 Justin Lemkul
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
An .itp is just a topology, so it's identical to a .top except that it
>>> does not have syst
On 8/19/13 10:22 AM, massimo sandal wrote:
2013/8/19 Justin Lemkul
An .itp is just a topology, so it's identical to a .top except that it
does not have system-level directives and does not #include a parent force
field. Manual sections 5.7.1 and 5.7.2 describe the relevant contents.
2013/8/19 Justin Lemkul
>
>
>>
> An .itp is just a topology, so it's identical to a .top except that it
> does not have system-level directives and does not #include a parent force
> field. Manual sections 5.7.1 and 5.7.2 describe the relevant contents.
>
>
>
I know - just to be sure we're under
On 8/19/13 6:45 AM, massimo sandal wrote:
Hi Justin,
I have a small ligand that apparently PRODRG gets wrong -it completely
alters the structure, borks angles etc. making it not what we want. So I
used xplo2d to obtain a suitable set of files that I used for docking
(with
HADDOCK).
Intere
On 8/19/13 6:27 AM, Aditya Padhi wrote:
Dear Gromacs Users,
I am new to Gromacs. Recently, I started working with Gromacs. I
want to study the mechanism of interaction of certain peptides that are
known to interact with membranes such as DOPC, POPC and so on. I have two
sets of peptide
On 8/19/13 5:38 AM, grita wrote:
Hey guys,
Is it possible to make a SD simulation with using the pull code in the GPU
version of Gromacs?
Have you tried it?
-Justin
--
==
Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Postdoctoral Fellow
Department of Pharmaceut
On 8/18/13 11:21 PM, udels can wrote:
Hi All,
I am facing a strange problem when I was trying to apply electric field
across a membrane, DMPC, water and ion system. To apply electric field
across the membrane (in +ve z direction), I had used NPzAT ensemble, where
the Pz is the constant pressu
So open your terminal app, type
sudo apt-get install gromacs
type your password at promt
volia, gromacs is installed
2013/8/19
> I am a new user.
> I have aquestion about install gromacs.
> I want to install gromacs.
> May guide me for install gromacs?
> --
> gmx-users mailing listgmx-users
Hi!
GROMACS is in the standart Ubuntu repo, so you can simply type
sudo apt-get install gromacs
in your terminal and after successfull installation call all gromacs
utilities from the command line
If you need some special versions of GROMACS or if you want to install it
from source, you can take a
I am a new user.
I have aquestion about install gromacs.
I want to install gromacs.
May guide me for install gromacs?
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/
Hi Justin,
>> I have a small ligand that apparently PRODRG gets wrong -it completely
>> alters the structure, borks angles etc. making it not what we want. So I
>> used xplo2d to obtain a suitable set of files that I used for docking
>> (with
>> HADDOCK).
>>
>>
> Interesting. The hallmark of the
Hi
I am a new user.
I have a questin for install gromacs on ubuntu.
May guide me for install gromacs?
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before po
Dear Gromacs Users,
I am new to Gromacs. Recently, I started working with Gromacs. I
want to study the mechanism of interaction of certain peptides that are
known to interact with membranes such as DOPC, POPC and so on. I have two
sets of peptides; out of which, one set of peptides are know
Dear Gromacs Users,
I have a query about the g_rdf utility. I have two different systems of
water with Ionic Liquid 1 and Ionic Liquid 2. When I plot the rdf using
g_rdf -f x_gro.pdb -s x.pdb -n rdf.ndx -o rdf1.xvg/rdf2.xvg -cn
rdf1_cn.xvg/rdf2_cn.xvg -rdf res_com
where rdf1/rdf2 is for water di
Hey guys,
Is it possible to make a SD simulation with using the pull code in the GPU
version of Gromacs?
Best, grita
--
View this message in context:
http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/GPU-version-of-Gromacs-tp5010581.html
Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
Dear Richard,
many thanks for this clarification.
Best, grita
--
View this message in context:
http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/what-is-sigma-in-gromacs-the-radius-of-a-sphere-or-the-diameter-of-a-sphere-tp5010517p5010580.html
Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.
42 matches
Mail list logo