Re: [gmx-users] An unexpected behavior of rdf calculated by the g_rdf command

2009-11-29 Thread
.   Sincerely: YeQing     --- 09年11月29日,周日, Justin A. Lemkul 写道: 发件人: Justin A. Lemkul 主题: Re: [gmx-users] An unexpected behavior of rdf calculated by the g_rdf command 收件人: "Discussion list for GROMACS users" 日期: 2009年11月29日,周日,上午10:57 青 叶 wro

Re: [gmx-users] An unexpected behavior of rdf calculated by the g_rdf command

2009-11-28 Thread
7日,周五, Lukasz Cwiklik 写道operation: 发件人: Lukasz Cwiklik 主题: Re: [gmx-users] An unexpected behavior of rdf calculated by the g_rdf command 收件人: "Discussion list for GROMACS users" 日期: 2009年11月27日,周五,下午10:06 On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 6:40 AM, 青 叶 wrote: > > Hello all gmx-users: >

[gmx-users] An unexpected behavior of rdf calculated by the g_rdf command

2009-11-26 Thread
Hello all gmx-users:    I have run a 100ns long MD simulation, the system is HAuCl4 acid solution, which contains one [AuCl4]- cluster and 503 water moleculars, and calculated the rdf by using the g_rdf command as follow: g_rdf -f yqqmd.trr -s yqqmd.tpr -n yqq.ndx -o rdf.xvg -cn cn.xvg -rdf a

[gmx-users] why the force is so large in energy minimization

2009-10-21 Thread
I did a energy minimization on a system contain one [AuCl4]- and 503 water moleculars, by using a self-define non-bond interaction (which is obtain from ab-initio calculation), my em.mdp file is as follow: title  = yqq cpp    = /usr/bin/cpp ; the c pre-processor de

[gmx-users] question about using new potential in groamcs

2009-09-15 Thread
Hello everybody:    I have read GROMACS' manual and found that the non-bond interaction in GROAMCS is describled as Coulomb term add A/r^12 -B/r^6 which is named Lennard-Jones term, but recently I have read some papers which use a effective-two-body potential to describle the non-bond intera