Re: [gmx-users] confusion about segmentation fault during mdrun

2010-05-20 Thread Lan Hua
at 6:03 PM, Justin A. Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote: Lan Hua wrote: Hi Justin, I appreciated your quick answers. So if I understand correctly, using constraints = hbonds with the time step of 2fs, it should be fine, right? Maybe. If your goal is REMD (I'm not clear from your original

[gmx-users] confusion about segmentation fault during mdrun

2010-05-19 Thread Lan Hua
Hi All, I understand that the error of segmentation fault may come from many reasons, but I just couldn't figure out the reason of this error in my simulations. I want to run md simulations with explicit water for 20 structures of one domain (residue 77-148) of calmodulin (PDB 1CFC).

Re: [gmx-users] confusion about segmentation fault during mdrun

2010-05-19 Thread Lan Hua
Hi Justin, Thank you so much for your quick reply and good suggestions. The following is my answer. On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Justin A. Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote: Lan Hua wrote: Hi All, I understand that the error of segmentation fault may come from many reasons

Re: [gmx-users] confusion about segmentation fault during mdrun

2010-05-19 Thread Lan Hua
Hi Justin, I appreciated your quick answers. So if I understand correctly, using constraints = hbonds with the time step of 2fs, it should be fine, right? Thanks, Lan On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Justin A. Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote: Lan Hua wrote: Hi Justin, Thank you so

Re: [gmx-users] confusion about segmentation fault during mdrun

2010-05-19 Thread Lan Hua
Thanks. The simulations are regular MD in explicit water at room temperature. Lan On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Justin A. Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote: Lan Hua wrote: Hi Justin, I appreciated your quick answers. So if I understand correctly, using constraints = hbonds