[gmx-users] Re:Re:Why REMD simulation becomes so slow when the number of replicas becomes large?

2011-02-08 Thread Qiong Zhang
Hi Mark,   Your analyses are quite reasonable. The low-temperature replicas are indeed doing much more work than the high-temperature replicas. As you said, the lowest temperature replica in the 24-replica should take an amount of time comparable to that of the lowest in the 42-replica. So for

Re:Re: [gmx-users] Why REMD simulation becomes so slow when the number of replicas becomes large?

2011-02-07 Thread Qiong Zhang
nergies 4    442   28.722   13.7 0.3  Rest   4    8426.029 4012.4    96.6 ---  Total  4    8726.270 4155.4   100.0 Qiong On 7/02/201

[gmx-users] Why REMD simulation becomes so slow when the number of replicas becomes large?

2011-02-07 Thread Qiong Zhang
Dear all gmx-users,   I have recently been testing the REMD simulations. I was running simulations on a supercomputer system based on the AMD Opteron 12-core (2.1 GHz) processors. The Gromacs 4.5.3 version was used.   I have a system of 5172 atoms, of which 138 atoms belong to solute and the

[gmx-users] Re:problem with interaction energy calculated by g_energy

2010-03-10 Thread Qiong Zhang
the interaction energy (E_inter = E_(1+2) - E_1 - E_2). They also used PME to deal with the long range electrostatic interaction. The force field they used is charmm. Any advice or comment are welcome! Thank you very much in advance. Qiong On 10/03/2010 7:56 AM, Qiong Zhang wrote: Hi dear Mark

[gmx-users] Re:problem with interaction energy calculated by g_energy

2010-03-09 Thread Qiong Zhang
ot be decomposed group-wise." Maybe a better way to overcome this is using the formula: E_interact=E_tot(1-2)-E_tot(1)-E_tot(2) Do you agree with this? I am highly appreciative for all your help! Qiong On 9/03/2010 9:32 PM, Qiong Zhang wrote: Hi gmx users, I found the big discrepancy b

[gmx-users] Re:problem with interaction energy calculated by g_energy

2010-03-09 Thread Qiong Zhang
? Thank you very much! Qiong [gmx-users] Re:problem with interaction energy calculated byg_energy Qiong Zhang Tue, 09 Mar 2010 01:17:02 -0800 Hi dear Mark, Please ignor my last mail replied to you. I made some mistake

[gmx-users] Re:problem with interaction energy calculated by g_energy

2010-03-09 Thread Qiong Zhang
you use in such interaction energy calculations? Thank you very much!   Qiong   --- On Tue, 3/9/10, Qiong Zhang wrote: From: Qiong Zhang Subject: Re:problem with interaction energy calculated by g_energy To: gmx-users@gromacs.org Date: Tuesday, March 9, 2010, 4:27 PM Hi dea

[gmx-users] Re:problem with interaction energy calculated by g_energy

2010-03-09 Thread Qiong Zhang
e excluded. Am I right here? For the second summing up problem, I am still checking all the input file, especially the index file. Thank you very much! Qiong - Original Message - From: Qiong Zhang Date: Monday, March 8, 2010 20:35 Subject: [gmx-users] problem with interaction energy ca

[gmx-users] problem with interaction energy calculated by g_energy

2010-03-08 Thread Qiong Zhang
Dear gmx users, I am studying the adsorption behavior of a molecule ( molecule 1) on a surface (molecules 2). Based on the production run, I calculated the interaction energy between molecule 1 and molecules 2 by g_energy. Here comes the first question: Why only short range interactions between