Prof Mobley,
Sorry to bother you, but do you have any suggestions for my previous post?
Thanks again,
Sai
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 9:52 PM, Sai Kumar Ramadugu wrote:
> Dear Prof Mobley,
>
> I have some additional questions in understanding the free energy
> calculations.
>
&g
lambda=0 and
lambda=1) but somewhat larger spacing between 0.1 and 0.9. How does g_bar
handle this? Is the integration and error analysis done correctly even when
the lambda spacing may be different at different lambda values?
Thank you for your time.
Regards
Sai
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 5:27 PM
As far as I know,
Glycam06 (AMBER) force field is not included in gromacs4.5.5.
If you want you can use amb2gmx.pl script that is available online or from
Erin Sorin's website at CSU @ Long Beach.
Remember that if you want to use GLYCAM06, its better to use AMBER ff99SB
or ff03 or the recent ff12
Hi Gmx Community,
I am doing Glutamate to Alanine mutation in presence and absence of a
ligand.
The Coulomb transformation is yielding the following results:
Glu--->Ala + ligand = 790.109 kJ/mol
Glu--->Ala + no ligand = 787.33 kJ/mol
During the LJ transformation
Glu--->Ala + ligand = - 24.87 kJ/m
Hi Fabian,
I am trying something similar with Glutamate to Alanine mutation.
Does your dummy atoms i.e., DUM1 have a value of 0.0 for sigma and epsilon
during all three steps or only in step 2?
Thanks for the time,
Sai
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Fabian Casteblanco <
fabian.castebla...@gma
Any suggestions on this topic?
Thanks again for your time.
Dear Gromacs Users,
> I am trying to find out the relative free energy difference of binding of
> a ligand with wild type protein (Glutamate residue) and mutant protein
> (Alanine residue).
>
> For charge part of the mutation, this is wha
Dear Gromacs Users,
I am trying to find out the relative free energy difference of binding of a
ligand with wild type protein (Glutamate residue) and mutant protein
(Alanine residue).
For charge part of the mutation, this is what I'm planning to do:
; residue 40 GLU rtp GLU q -1.0
552 opls
Dear Gromacs Users,
I am trying to plot the Ryckaert-Bellemans energy for rotating the chi1
dihedral of glutamate in protein.
I tried to change the ch1 dihedral from 0-360 degrees at increments of 1
degree and saved the pdbs. Then I used the pdb's to obtain the
corresponding gro files and a single
Hi Gromacs Users,
I want to mutate a glutamate in my protein to alanine in presence of a
ligand.
With glutamate, the protein charge is -3. To neutralize the system, I added
3K+ ions.
Now when I mutate GLU to ALA, the charge in state_B will be +1 (protein -2
+ 3K+).
Right now I'm in the charge part
Hi Stephane & Chris,
I followed all the threads posted by you two.
I have a protein using ff99SB and GLYCAM for sugars. I have a disaccharide
bound to protein. In xleap of AMBERTOOLS, I use the GLYCAM and ff99SB to
generate the topology and coordinate files. I did the tests as Chris'
original posts
I agree with Justin. I have tried myself several SMD simulations for ligand
binding studies. I tried 500 simulations and not sure if they are enough.
Further, the path dependence is very important part.
For different paths that you can try, look at McCammon group's paper in
JACS 128, 3019-3026. The
Hi Sanku,
I was using the pullf.xvg and multiplying it with pulling rate and time.
f*v*dt = W
and getting the total work for each SMD simulation.
I'm not sure if this is the best/correct way to do it. But from original
Jarzynski's article (PRL (2007) 78(14), 2690-2693) this is what I deduced.
I as
Dear All,
I have tried to calculate the free energy of binding using Jarzynski
equality. I employed the following procedure.
--I did force pulling simulations along Z-direction as exemplified in
Justin's umbrella sampling simulations. I did 50, 250 and 500 pulling
simulations to test the converge
Dear All,
I'm running set of umbrella sampling simulations to get the PMF of a
disaccharide binding to a protein.
I followed the tutorial provided by Justin and changed the values of
necessary parameters according to my system.
The mdp file for umbrella sampling simulations is as follows:
-
Hi
Well the tutorial in the following website has mentioned about the
importance of sc_alpha and sc-power. Also the manual gives you more
information.
http://www.dillgroup.ucsf.edu/group/wiki/index.php/Free_Energy:_Tutorial.
Regards
Sai
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
>
Hi Morteza,
I had this problem when I was running a trimeric protein attached to an
oligosaccharide.
*I have used the following command:*
* *
*trjconv -s .tpr -f .xtc -o -boxcenter tric -pbc mol*
* *
*but it is not working.*
Do the following. It worked for me.
In the first round, run
Hi Fancy,
The following link shows the change from p-cresol to Toluene. So follow
the steps in the same by converting threonine to methionine.
http://compbio.chemistry.uq.edu.au/education/Free-Energy_Course/0.introduction.html
Regards
Sai
2010/6/5 fancy2012
> Dear GMX users,
>
> I want to c
HI
Its not working for me either.
But for free energy tutorials using GROMACS, I think the one written by Prof
Mobley is like Bible.
The link is as follows:
http://www.dillgroup.ucsf.edu/group/wiki/index.php/Free_Energy:_Tutorial
But the one written by Prof Alan Mark (who is now in Queensland Univ
Dear Gromacs Users,
I have a simulation of a protein in Truncated Octahedron box. I want to
calculate the water residence times and mean square displacements (of water)
around the active site residues. We developed our own algorithm for doing
the same.
In earlier simulations I had cubic box and
Hi All,
I'm trying to run free energy simulations for a linkage change in an
oligosaccharide when bound to its protein.
The linkage changes from beta 1-4 to beta 1-3. I followed the tutorial by
Prof Mobley.
For the lambda values I took 0 to 1 at intervals of 0.05. The values of
dVpot/dlambda fro
Dear All,
In my previous email the text in the message was not shown. Thats why I'm
writing this again.
I request to see the attachment of earlier message. I'm sorry for this!!
I have an disaccharide bound to a C-type lectin. The sequence of
disaccharide is beta-galactose1-4beta-GlcNAc. The 3
Dear All,
I have an disaccharide bound to a C-type lectin. The sequence of
disaccharide is beta-galactose1-4beta-GlcNAc. The 3'OH and 4'OH of
beta-galactose coordinate to the Ca2+ at the active site. FRET experiments
have shown that if the disaccharide linkage is changed to
beta-galactose1-3bet
Dear All,
I have a trimeric protein system which binds to two different ligands.
The ligands are oligosaccharides. The difference between the two is first
ligand has beta 1-4 linkage and the second ligand has beta 1-3 linkage
between Galactose (Gal) and N-Acetyl Glucosamine (GlcNAc). Since the l
23 matches
Mail list logo