Dear all,
I want to know if someone has had the same problem as me. I am running AFM
calculations. when trying to plot the data from the pdo file, I can see
that the coordinates are not fixed for jumps!
The pulled group coordinates sometimes stay the same while the Reference
and spring coordinate
Hello Janne,
this is what I usually do when my molecules cross the box or dance all
around and it works for me:
I first do this with the original unmodified or fitted xtc or trr file:
trjconv -f -o -pbc nojump
then i take the modified trr or xtc and do a fit:
trjconv -f -s -fit rot+trans
Dear gromacs users,
I would like to obtain a potential of mean force (PMF) plot from an AFM
Pulling calculation.
I used AFM method in the Pull code to separate two strands of peptides
along their center of mass reaction coordinate.
here is the parameters I used:
runtype = afm
ngroups = 1
Hi Maik,
Thank you for the answer. I still have some questions.
I still didn't get the umberalla sampling method. It seems to me AFM and
umberalla are the same except that in umberalla we dont define a Pull
rate. Looking at the literature, people have been using umberalla method
with discrete
Dear all,
I have been reading the literature, mailing list and the manual.
There is some questions that I cant understand:
1) there is three methods for the pull code: constraint force, AFM and
umberalla.
in both AFM and Constraint force, there is an option of the rate of
pulling
Thank you David and Arneh for the comments.
I just have a couple of things i want to clarify about the constrain
distances i used. The distance I used to pull the ligand and receptor
apart was a non-bonded distance between the amide nitrogen of the ligand
and the oxygen carbonyl of the receptor
Thank you for the reply,
Sorry for the confusion of my two emails. I guess I was using the word
pulling in the wrong context. Now after my extensive reading, what I
meant is that i want to calculate the absoulte binding free energy of a
ligand/receptor complex.
I have read the manual over and
Hello,
I have tried using the mdrun_mpi and it can't run. It gives me this error:
Failed to find the following executable:
Executable: mdrun_mpi
Cannot continue.
Belquis
I ran this command for Parellel calculation:
mpirun -np 2 mdrun -deffnm filename
did you try the following
Dear Gromacs users,
I am trying to do Parellel calculations using Gromacs on a Rocks cluster
that has MPI enabled.
Has anybody encountered the following error:
Program mdrun, VERSION 3.3.1
Source code file: init.c, line: 69
Fatal error:
run input file RecpAntiP-cl#1-SG-consP-L0-1-G.tpr was
Hi,
I am not the one who built it, but it is MPI supported.
Have your built the GROMACS with MPI-support?
Regards,
Yang Ye
On 8/1/2007 4:35 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Gromacs users,
I am trying to do Parellel calculations using Gromacs on a Rocks
cluster
that has MPI
hi,
did u specify an index file in your command line for the 2 groups (protein
and SOl?
Dhananjay,
Consider searching the list archive... All possible solutions are in
there.
Cheers,
Tsjerk
On 7/27/07, Dhananjay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
I am getting error in pr
hello all,
is it possible to constrain a distance (or several) between a
ligand-receptor complex inorder to simulate free energy change of
separating the ligand from the receptor?
I intend to use TI and lamda to do free energy calculations.
any help is appreicated.
Belquis
Hello Gromacs users,
I am trying to do a free energy calculation, which I have never done
before. I have read the manual and the tutorial on the wiki but there is
still some issues not clear to me.
I am trying to calculate free energy difference of pulling the ligand from
a beta-sheet receptor.
hello all,
I am trying to get the best representative structure of a 40ns MD of a
receptor to use for free energy calculations.
I want to have an idea what is the best way to do that.
I am using g_cluster with the gromos method. Is there a way to estimate
the noise errors of the cluster
Hello all,
I have tried using trjconv -pbc(all options) to get a continuous
trjactoary visulations on VMD. I am modeling an 11 residue receptor
antiparellel to itself and one of the receptor strand jumps outside the
box sometimes.
I have used search to solve the problem but everthing i tried
Hi Tsjerk,
Thank you for replying. I did give it a reference structure where the two
parts are together. I solved the problem finally!
I had a 10ns simulation before that and I used -pbc nojump on the original
trjactory and it worked fine..but when I did it for the extra 10 ns i ran,
it didnt
Hi TSjerk,
Thanks for the explaination. It is appreciated.
Belquis
Hi Belquis,
Just some background on the issue. The reason that your solution
worked, and therefore the failure of your first procedure, is that in
the second case the frame at t=10ns was modified using the frame at
Hello All,
I have a xtc file and I used trjconv on it to reduce the number of frames
using:
trjconv -f original.xtc -o reduced-frames.xtc -s xx.tpr -timestep 20 -fit
rot+trans -skip 2 -center no
Now I have two xtc files for a 10ns simulation:
original.xtc
reduced-frames.xtc
I did gmxcheck
Hello all,
I restarted a crashed run due to power outage using these command lines:
tpbconv -s md0-30ns.tpr -f md0-30ns.trr -e md0-30ns.edr -o md0-30ns-C.tpr
then
mdrun -s md0-30ns-C.tpr -e md0-30ns-C.edr -o md0-30ns-C.trr -x
md0-30ns-C.xtc -c after_md0-30ns-C.gro -g md0-30ns-C.log
The
Hi Tsjerk,
thank u for the answer. I checked my mdp file (nstvout=0). I just want to
make sure that since nstvout=0 in my mdp file, and I used tpbconv means
that it generated the run from the beginning of the crashed run? not the
last frame? i
Belquis
Hi Belquis,
I think you have the same
Hi,
I ran gmxcheck and 0 frames have velocities.
so it means it started from beginning?
Belquis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Tsjerk,
thank u for the answer. I checked my mdp file (nstvout=0). I just want
to
make sure that since nstvout=0 in my mdp file, and I used tpbconv
means
that
sorry to ask again, I hope this is my last question about this.
since I know now that the restarted run I did started from 0 time. I
killed the job and it wrote velocity for the last frame. So since i knew i
have to contiune this run that I just killed, I used tpbconj and it wrote
a new tpr file
Thank you. I will save some energies and velocities in future simulations.
but in this email, my job was not crashed..I terminated it and it wrote
the last velocities and when i wanted to contiune it using pbdconj, it
said it will finish the simulation from the time I terminated it.
so is this
Hi,
I know this should be trivial..but i cant understand what this option do:
-dtOnly write frame when t MOD dt = first time (ps)
would some explain what is MOD and how this is relevent to g_cluster or
trjconv.
Thank u
___
gmx-users mailing list
Hello all,
I am new to using Gromacs and MD simulation. I am simulating a 9-residue
drug with a box of water. I generated the box using this:
editconf -f xx.gro -o xx.gro -d 0.5 -bt cubic
everything seems fine and the MD run went smooth. However when I look at
the trajectory, I see that the drug
25 matches
Mail list logo