bject: Re: [gmx-users] Fwd: What could be wrong with rdf plot?
It is always better to keep the discussion in the list. Someone
could benefit of it as well as you from others.
From: Lum Nforbi
Date: January 4, 2010 7:57:04 PM GMT+01:00
To: XAvier Periole
Subject: Thank you for reply on RDF
From: gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org on behalf of XAvier Periole
Sent: Tue 1/5/2010 6:33 AM
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Fwd: What could be wrong with rdf plot?
It is always better to keep the discussion in the list. Someone
could benefit of it as well as you from o
or you have to find out our self, looking at
the code
or in the archive :))
Thank you,
Lum
Message: 3
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 13:18:29 +0100
From: XAvier Periole
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Fwd: What could be wrong with rdf plot?
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Message-ID: <28fdb30b-7
I am not sure somebody gave you an answer ...
the first intense and probably very narrow pick is very
likely due to the intramolecular OH distance. It should be
around 0.1 nm, isn't it?
On Jan 1, 2010, at 3:53 AM, Lum Nforbi wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Lum Nforbi
D
-- Forwarded message --
From: Lum Nforbi
Date: Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 12:33 PM
Subject: What could be wrong with rdf plot?
To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
Dear all,
I am currently analyzing a system of 2000 molecules of TIP3P water on
which I performed a NPT simulation. The plot fo
5 matches
Mail list logo
