Re: [gmx-users] Gromacs compilation on AMD multicore

2011-07-06 Thread Alexey Shvetsov
Also for additional performance benefit you can use atlas math library and compile gromacs and fftw with additional cflags like '-mfpmath=sse - msse_version' This will enable sse math (by default gcc generates i386 and sse). PS Also you can use CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe -march=native -mfpmath=sse -

[gmx-users] Gromacs compilation on AMD multicore

2011-07-05 Thread Anthony Cruz Balberdi
Dear Users: We recently received our new computer. This computer have 4 multicore Opteron AMD cpus and I am planning to install GROMAS. Which options I will need to use in order to achieve the best possible performance? Which compiler GNU or Intel? Thank you for all you help. Anthony --

Re: [gmx-users] Gromacs compilation on AMD multicore

2011-07-05 Thread Matthew Zwier
Hi Anthony, The default options are nearly optimal, and the difference between a modern (4.4 or 4.5) GCC On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Anthony Cruz Balberdi anthony.cr...@upr.edu wrote: Dear Users: We recently received our new computer.  This computer have 4 multicore Opteron AMD cpus and

Re: [gmx-users] Gromacs compilation on AMD multicore

2011-07-05 Thread Matthew Zwier
Sorry about that. The default options are nearly optimal, and the difference between a modern (4.4 or 4.5) series GCC and the Intel compilers are only a couple of percent. Just be sure to have FFTW available. On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Matthew Zwier mczw...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Anthony,

Re: [gmx-users] Gromacs compilation on AMD multicore

2011-07-05 Thread Mark Abraham
On 6/07/2011 12:28 AM, Matthew Zwier wrote: Sorry about that. The default options are nearly optimal, and the difference between a modern (4.4 or 4.5) series GCC and the Intel compilers are only a couple of percent. Just be sure to have FFTW available. ... if planning to use PME. Also, Intel

Re: [gmx-users] Gromacs compilation on AMD multicore

2011-07-05 Thread Anthony Cruz Balberdi
Thank you very much Mark. Another question, will be better if I compile FFTW than use the one included in my linux distro? Anthony On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.auwrote: On 6/07/2011 12:28 AM, Matthew Zwier wrote: Sorry about that. The default options

Re: [gmx-users] Gromacs compilation on AMD multicore

2011-07-05 Thread Mark Abraham
On 6/07/2011 1:36 AM, Anthony Cruz Balberdi wrote: Thank you very much Mark. Another question, will be better if I compile FFTW than use the one included in my linux distro? Per the GROMACS installation instructions, you want the precision of FFTW to match the precision of GROMACS. You'll

Re: [gmx-users] Gromacs compilation on AMD multicore

2011-07-05 Thread Szilárd Páll
Additionally, if you care about a few percent extra performance, you should use gcc 4.5 or 4.6 for compiling Gromacs as well as FFTW (unless you have a bleeding-edge OS which was built with any of these latest gcc versions). While you might not see a lot of improvement in mdrun performance (wrt