Re: [gmx-users] Hbond Shake and Gromacs Version Related

2012-08-20 Thread Sapna Sarupria
That is a very valid point, Mark! and very well said indeed. Yes, you are absolutely correct that we were in a rush to get to the "equilibrium" point but it had to be pushed gently. Thanks, Sapna On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Mark Abraham wrote: > On 21/08/2012 9:02 AM, Sapna Sarupria wrote:

Re: [gmx-users] Hbond Shake and Gromacs Version Related

2012-08-20 Thread Mark Abraham
On 21/08/2012 9:02 AM, Sapna Sarupria wrote: Thanks Mark. I also discovered that if I set the value of nstpcoule = 1 explicitly in my mdp file, it runs with the newer version of Gromacs 4.5.5 which was not the case earlier. Yes, default behaviour of this kind of thing has varied over time. Ag

Re: [gmx-users] Hbond Shake and Gromacs Version Related

2012-08-20 Thread Sapna Sarupria
Thanks Mark. I also discovered that if I set the value of nstpcoule = 1 explicitly in my mdp file, it runs with the newer version of Gromacs 4.5.5 which was not the case earlier. Can you tell me what this variable does exactly? Will your suggestion that the initial setup might be faulty still be

Re: [gmx-users] Hbond Shake and Gromacs Version Related

2012-08-20 Thread Mark Abraham
On 21/08/2012 8:45 AM, Sapna Sarupria wrote: Hello All, I have been having rather bizarre experience with Gromacs and was wondering if any one can shed some light on what is happening. I am running simulations of a hydrate + water system (think of hydrate as ice if you are not familiar with them

[gmx-users] Hbond Shake and Gromacs Version Related

2012-08-20 Thread Sapna Sarupria
Hello All, I have been having rather bizarre experience with Gromacs and was wondering if any one can shed some light on what is happening. I am running simulations of a hydrate + water system (think of hydrate as ice if you are not familiar with them). So basically I have a simple solid+liquid sy