Thanks, but I will start from scratch.
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
> Quoting Sergio Manzetti :
>
> > Justin, THe FFTW messagte was AFTER sudo make install.
> >
>
> Then you're not an admin. You can always do the installations in your home
> directory (for both FF
Quoting Sergio Manzetti :
> Justin, THe FFTW messagte was AFTER sudo make install.
>
Then you're not an admin. You can always do the installations in your home
directory (for both FFTW and Gromacs) by specifying an appropriate --prefix
during configuration.
-Justin
> On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at
Justin, THe FFTW messagte was AFTER sudo make install.
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Sergio Manzetti <
sergio.manze...@vestforsk.no> wrote:
> Well here is the FFTW message at make install:
>
> /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 'fftw3.h' '/usr/local/include/fftw3.h'
> /usr/bin/install: cannot rem
Well here is the FFTW message at make install:
/usr/bin/install -c -m 644 'fftw3.h' '/usr/local/include/fftw3.h'
/usr/bin/install: cannot remove `/usr/local/include/fftw3.h': Permission
denied
/usr/bin/install -c -m 644 'fftw3.f' '/usr/local/include/fftw3.f'
/usr/bin/install: cannot remove `/usr
Thanks again J, is that compulsory each time one installs something new?
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
> Quoting Sergio Manzetti :
>
> > Thanks J, I think I will install Ubuntu entirely first, because I just
> tried
> > to install FFTW now, and managed only to get to m
Quoting Sergio Manzetti :
> Thanks J, I think I will install Ubuntu entirely first, because I just tried
> to install FFTW now, and managed only to get to make install, then I got
> permission denied messages, so even though I thought I was the admin, I am
> seemingly not.
>
Before blowing away y
Thanks J, I think I will install Ubuntu entirely first, because I just tried
to install FFTW now, and managed only to get to make install, then I got
permission denied messages, so even though I thought I was the admin, I am
seemingly not.
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
Quoting Sergio Manzetti :
> Thanks Justin, here is it the copy-out:
>
> ser...@sergio-laptop:~/Desktop/gromacs-4.5.3$ ./configure
> checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
> checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
> checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
> chec
Thanks Justin, here is it the copy-out:
ser...@sergio-laptop:~/Desktop/gromacs-4.5.3$ ./configure
checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane..
Quoting Sergio Manzetti :
> Not really, there were no errors with ./configure
>
That's simply not possible. The purpose of configuration is to determine
specifications of your system, which are then used to write the Makefile. If
you have no Makefile, then something failed. If you want to try to
Not really, there were no errors with ./configure
so I downloaded the version through ubunto sudo -apt get install gromacs
but it was old version
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Mark Abraham wrote:
> On 24/12/2010 6:45 PM, Sergio Manzetti wrote:
>
> Hi thanks, but if I use make it says mak
On 24/12/2010 6:45 PM, Sergio Manzetti wrote:
Hi thanks, but if I use make it says make no Makefile found...
Right, so configure didn't work, unlike your statement that it did
work... Troubleshoot the step that failed, not things that came after it...
Mark
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:46 PM
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Sergio Manzetti <
sergio.manze...@vestforsk.no> wrote:
> Hi thanks, but if I use make it says make no Makefile found...
>
> Yes, Makefile should be generated by configure. You should check the last
few lines that configure output to your screen and the configure lo
Hi thanks, but if I use make it says make no Makefile found...
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Mark Abraham wrote:
> On 23/12/2010 9:12 PM, Sergio Manzetti wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear Users, I am unable to get pass the first step of ./configure . This
>> step works, but when typing "make" it
On 23/12/2010 9:12 PM, Sergio Manzetti wrote:
Dear Users, I am unable to get pass the first step of ./configure .
This step works, but when typing "make" it says:
no targets specified and no makefile found.
That suggests configure did not work.
Should it be like this, or is it compulso
I would like to suggest to you read [1]
Furthermore, you can read INSTALL.cmake file which explains some steps to
compile Gromacs through cmake command.
[1] http://www.gromacs.org/Developer_Zone/Cmake
--
Rodrigo Antonio Faccioli
Ph.D Student in Electrical Engineering
University of Sao Paulo - U
Dear Users, I am unable to get pass the first step of ./configure . This
step works, but when typing "make" it says:
no targets specified and no makefile found.
Should it be like this, or is it compulsory to use cmake?
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/m
17 matches
Mail list logo
