[gmx-users] NVT equilibration

2012-08-09 Thread Shima Arasteh
Dear gmx users, I used the NVT (T=300) equilibration for my system ( a protein in water). The first time, I set 100 ps for system for equilibration, It resulted in RMSD=3.96 with an average temperature around 299.803 K. Then I though of a better convergence, so set the equilibration to 200

RE: [gmx-users] NVT equilibration

2012-08-09 Thread Marzinek, Jan
: Thursday, August 09, 2012 1:23 PM To: Discussion list for GROMACS users Subject: [gmx-users] NVT equilibration Dear gmx users, I used the NVT (T=300) equilibration for my system ( a protein in water). The first time, I set 100 ps for system for equilibration, It resulted in RMSD=3.96

Re: [gmx-users] NVT equilibration

2012-08-09 Thread Peter C. Lai
Parts of your system shifted too much (in Y dimension) for PME to handle. What happens to the system up to the point of the crash? How large is the system (particle count) vs. # of PME nodes used? Could be your system is too small for the # of PME nodes used Is the protein somehow interacting

Re: [gmx-users] NVT equilibration

2012-08-09 Thread Shima Arasteh
? Sincerely, Shima - Original Message - From: Peter C. Lai p...@uab.edu To: Discussion list for GROMACS users gmx-users@gromacs.org Cc: Sent: Thursday, August 9, 2012 5:08 PM Subject: Re: [gmx-users] NVT equilibration Parts of your system shifted too much (in Y dimension) for PME to handle

Re: [gmx-users] NVT equilibration

2012-08-09 Thread Peter C. Lai
: Re: [gmx-users] NVT equilibration Parts of your system shifted too much (in Y dimension) for PME to handle. What happens to the system up to the point of the crash? How large is the system (particle count) vs. # of PME nodes used? Could be your system is too small for the # of PME nodes

[gmx-users] nvt equilibration output

2012-05-16 Thread priya thiyagarajan
Respected sir, I am studying about micelle formation .. After setting box and adding water i went for energy minimization and then went for nvt equilibration for 1ns. when i visualized my nvt.pdb file, i found that my protein comes together and formed three micelle like structure. but my box

Re: [gmx-users] nvt equilibration output

2012-05-16 Thread Mark Abraham
On 16/05/2012 4:18 PM, priya thiyagarajan wrote: Respected sir, I am studying about micelle formation .. After setting box and adding water i went for energy minimization and then went for nvt equilibration for 1ns. when i visualized my nvt.pdb file, i found that my protein comes together

Re: [gmx-users] nvt equilibration output

2012-05-16 Thread rama david
Hi Priya, My query is different than your problem .. I wondered Is you use position restrained in nvt...?? In position restrained protein comes togather or you remove position restraind ... Sorry for trouble you... With Best wishes, Rama David -- gmx-users mailing list

[gmx-users] nvt equilibration output

2012-05-16 Thread priya thiyagarajan
Respected sir, thanks for your kind reply... i applied position restrain during nvt step sir.. Thanking you, -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search

[gmx-users] NVT Equilibration

2011-11-26 Thread Alex Jemulin
Dear all I'm studying a membrane protein. I've run equilibration with the follwing parameters - reference temperature =323k integrator = md ; leap-frog integrator nsteps = 5 ; 2 * 5 = 100 ps dt = 0.002 ; 2 fs tcoupl = V-rescale ; modified Berendsen thermostat The

Re: [gmx-users] NVT Equilibration

2011-11-26 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Alex Jemulin wrote: Dear all I'm studying a membrane protein. I've run equilibration with the follwing parameters - reference temperature =323k integrator = md ; leap-frog integrator nsteps = 5 ; 2 * 5 = 100 ps dt = 0.002 ; 2 fs tcoupl = V-rescale ; modified Berendsen thermostat The

[gmx-users] NVT Equilibration

2011-11-25 Thread Alex Jemulin
Dear all I'm studying a membrane protein. I've run equilibration with the follwing parameters - reference temperature =323k integrator = md  ; leap-frog integrator nsteps  = 5  ; 2 * 5 = 100 ps dt  = 0.002  ; 2 fs tcoupl  = V-rescale ; modified Berendsen thermostat The

[gmx-users] nvt equilibration

2011-11-19 Thread swati patel
Hello Justin, I am curious to know that why have nvt equilibration is not performed in umbrella sampling? Thanx. -- gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users Please search the archive at

Re: [gmx-users] nvt equilibration

2011-11-19 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
swati patel wrote: Hello Justin, I am curious to know that why have nvt equilibration is not performed in umbrella sampling? NVT is not necessarily required. I just happen to know that the system used in the tutorial is rather robust and can proceed straight to NPT. Typically NVT is

[gmx-users] NVT Equilibration

2011-10-06 Thread Ravi Kumar Venkatraman
*Dear All, But I scaled the solvent box according to the density using editconf_d command line. Then I carried out EM and NVT equilibration.* *With Regards, Ravi Kumar Venkatraman, IPC Dept., IISc, Bangalore, INDIA. +91-9686933963.* -- gmx-users mailing list

Re: [gmx-users] NVT Equilibration

2011-10-06 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Ravi Kumar Venkatraman wrote: *Dear All, But I scaled the solvent box according to the density using editconf_d command line. Then I carried out EM and NVT equilibration.* Scaling the box with editconf simply scales the coordinates of the molecules in it, which may or may

RE: [gmx-users] NVT Equilibration

2011-10-06 Thread Dallas Warren
, 6 October 2011 9:35 PM To: Discussion list for GROMACS users Subject: Re: [gmx-users] NVT Equilibration Ravi Kumar Venkatraman wrote: *Dear All, But I scaled the solvent box according to the density using editconf_d command line. Then I carried out EM and NVT

Re: [gmx-users] NVT Equilibration

2011-10-06 Thread Matthew Zwier
Concur. I just used this approach to equilibrate a box of water/acetonitrile. If your box shrinks too much, you can probably use editconf and genbox to replicate the equilibrated box into a larger box of arbitrary size and shape. MZ On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Dallas Warren

[gmx-users] NVT equilibration of ethanol in OPLSAA ff

2011-10-05 Thread Ravi Kumar Venkatraman
Dear All, I downloaded ethanol.pdb file from prodrg server (all-atom). I used ethanol.itp file that was in oplsaa.ff directory of gromacs to create topology file for ethanol. I used genconf_d command to generate solvent box of 512 molecules (as of Bevan's gromacs tutorial) and then I

Re: [gmx-users] NVT equilibration of ethanol in OPLSAA ff

2011-10-05 Thread Mark Abraham
On 5/10/2011 6:36 PM, Ravi Kumar Venkatraman wrote: Dear All, I downloaded ethanol.pdb file from prodrg server (all-atom). I used ethanol.itp file that was in oplsaa.ff directory of gromacs to create topology file for ethanol. I used genconf_d command to generate solvent box of

[gmx-users] NVT equilibration.

2011-10-05 Thread Ravi Kumar Venkatraman
Dear All, My commands where, genconf_d -f ethanol.gro -o ethanol512.gro -nbox 8 8 8 editconf_d -f eth512.gro -density 785.22 -o den.gro I saw the den.gro by using VMD. I saw only as points but not the molecules. EM: grompp_d -f em.mdp -c den.gro -p ethanol.top -o em.tpr

[gmx-users] NVT equilibration of Ethanol in OPLSAA.

2011-10-04 Thread Ravi Kumar Venkatraman
*Dear all, I have been trying to generate pre-equilibrated ethanol solvent box of 512 molecules in **OPLSAA ff. I used ethanol.itp in oplsaa.ff directory for generating the topology file for ethanol. After NVT equilibration some of the molecules get aggregated and there is some void

Re: [gmx-users] NVT equilibration of Ethanol in OPLSAA.

2011-10-04 Thread Mark Abraham
On 4/10/2011 6:16 PM, Ravi Kumar Venkatraman wrote: *Dear all, I have been trying to generate pre-equilibrated ethanol solvent box of 512 molecules in **OPLSAA ff. I used ethanol.itp in oplsaa.ff directory for generating the topology file for ethanol. After NVT equilibration some

RE: [gmx-users] NVT equilibration of Ethanol in OPLSAA.

2011-10-04 Thread Dallas Warren
[mailto:gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org] On Behalf Of Ravi Kumar Venkatraman Sent: Tuesday, 4 October 2011 6:17 PM To: gmx-users@gromacs.org Subject: [gmx-users] NVT equilibration of Ethanol in OPLSAA. Dear all, I have been trying to generate pre-equilibrated ethanol solvent box of 512

[gmx-users] NVT Equilibration getting blown up

2011-10-01 Thread Ravi Kumar Venkatraman
Dear All, I am doing NVT equilibration for Ethanol of cubic box of side length 6.10346 nm in OPLSAA ff after doing the Energy Minimisation. My system getting blown up when I do NVT equilibration. Following are the some parameters that I have mentioned in *.mdp files, 100 ps run in 2

Re: [gmx-users] NVT Equilibration getting blown up

2011-10-01 Thread Mark Abraham
On 1/10/2011 5:09 PM, Ravi Kumar Venkatraman wrote: Dear All, I am doing NVT equilibration for Ethanol of cubic box of side length 6.10346 nm in OPLSAA ff after doing the Energy Minimisation. My system getting blown up when I do NVT equilibration. Following are the some

[gmx-users] NVT equilibration of DMSO solvent (Charmm all-atom force field)

2011-06-20 Thread udaya kiran marelli
Dear GROMACS users, I have generated a 4*4*4 octahedral DMSO box containing 64 molecules (Charmm all-atom force field) which need to be NVT equilibrated in order to pass it for usage in genbox. Could one of you provide info on how to do the NVT and periodic boundary equilibration to remove the

Re: [gmx-users] NVT equilibration of DMSO solvent (Charmm all-atom force field)

2011-06-20 Thread Mark Abraham
On 21/06/2011 2:44 AM, udaya kiran marelli wrote: Dear GROMACS users, I have generated a 4*4*4 octahedral DMSO box containing 64 molecules (Charmm all-atom force field) which need to be NVT equilibrated in order to pass it for usage in genbox. Could one of you provide info on how to do the