I surely searched for answers looking through gromacs, charmm documentation,
mailing list, web, literature, etc. before posting my question. I know that
it sounds inappropriate because it isn't a technical question, nevertheless
I still wasn't able to solve the apparent contradiction between NMR da
Chiara Parravicini wrote:
Do you refer to pages 58-61 or 148-149 of the manual, about distance
restraints and NMR refinement?
Yes. Having read them, and having worked out how to implement them in
the context of the tables in section 5.6 4 is prerequisite to you
solving your problem :-) "How
Do you refer to pages 58-61 or 148-149 of the manual, about distance
restraints and NMR refinement?
In that case is still not clear to me if the authors in the cited paper use
simple distance restraints or apply NMR-derived data, given that the model
presented is based on a X-Ray structure.
So,
> Dear Gromacs users,
>
> I'd like to perform a simulation following the protocol applied in the
> Ivanov's paper (*Molecular dynamics simulation of the P2Y14 receptor.
> Ligand
> docking and identification of a putative binding site of the distal hexose
> moiety.* *Bioorg. Med Chem Lett.* 2007;17
Dear Gromacs users,
I'd like to perform a simulation following the protocol applied in the
Ivanov's paper (*Molecular dynamics simulation of the P2Y14 receptor. Ligand
docking and identification of a putative binding site of the distal hexose
moiety.* *Bioorg. Med Chem Lett.* 2007;17(3):761-6. ).
Dear Gromacs users,
I intend to perform a MD simulation of a GPCR model applying distant
restraints to the backbone of alpha helices, something like NOE
distance restraints. I guess that gromacs can't do it directly but if
I've well understand I can manually provide classical distance
restraints i
6 matches
Mail list logo