Re: [gmx-users] OPLS/AA + TIP5P, anybody?

2013-10-07 Thread gigo
Dear Chris, Thank you for your message. I uploaded everything to the redmine. I will let you know how the simulation with generated velocities went. I asked the authors about any exemplary input that worked with tip5p and oplsaa, but I did not get anything... Best, Grzegorz On 2013-10-04 17:2

[gmx-users] OPLS/AA + TIP5P, anybody?

2013-10-04 Thread Christopher Neale
Dear Grzegorz: >From a quick look at your .mdp, I also suggest that you go back to your system >including the peptide that you had managed to finish EM with modified flexible >tip5p but then crashed with the standard rigid tip5p during MD and try the MD >again using gen-vel = yes if you're sti

Re: [gmx-users] OPLS/AA + TIP5P, anybody?

2013-10-01 Thread gigo
Dear Chris, By now 7ns of the MD passed without a single warning. Best Regards, Grzegorz P.s. The mdp: constraints = none integrator = md dt = 0.001; ps nsteps = 1000 ; total 10 ns nstcomm = 1000 nstxout =

[gmx-users] OPLS/AA + TIP5P, anybody?

2013-09-30 Thread Christopher Neale
One a system passes EM and a couple of ps of MD, is it always stable indefinitely? If not, then something is wrong somewhere. -- original message -- Dear Chris, I put one tip5p molecule in a center of dodecahedral box - 2nm from that molecule to walls, filled it with tip5p, ran 6000 steps of st

Re: [gmx-users] OPLS/AA + TIP5P, anybody?

2013-09-29 Thread gigo
Dear Chris, I put one tip5p molecule in a center of dodecahedral box - 2nm from that molecule to walls, filled it with tip5p, ran 6000 steps of steep minimization. After another 2704 steps of cg it converged to emtol 1.0. I run 100k steps of nvt on this box afterwards (http://shroom.ibb.waw.pl

Re: [gmx-users] OPLS/AA + TIP5P, anybody?

2013-09-29 Thread gigo
Dear Chris, I did not post the redmine issue yet, I want to check every possibility beforehand. I will analyze trajectories more closely now. Best, Grzegorz On 2013-09-29 18:47, Christopher Neale wrote: Dear Grzegorz: Under no conditions should any of the tip5p geometry change (for the standa

[gmx-users] OPLS/AA + TIP5P, anybody?

2013-09-29 Thread Christopher Neale
Dear Grzegorz: Under no conditions should any of the tip5p geometry change (for the standard tip5p model). If you find that this is happening, then that is certainly an error. You can check if you like by analyzing your trajectory. However, flexible bonds will allow the distance from the argi

Re: [gmx-users] OPLS/AA + TIP5P, anybody?

2013-09-29 Thread gigo
error for the combination of oplsaa and tip5p. Chris. gigo gigo at ibb.waw.pl Sun Sep 29 00:59:42 CEST 2013 Previous message: [gmx-users] OPLS/AA + TIP5P, anybody? Next message: [gmx-users] Restarting simulation -s. files? Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] Dear Chris,

[gmx-users] OPLS/AA + TIP5P, anybody?

2013-09-28 Thread Christopher Neale
s point it is a good idea for you to file a redmine issue. It's not a gromacs error per se, but if this is true then pdb2gmx or grompp should give a warning or error for the combination of oplsaa and tip5p. Chris. gigo gigo at ibb.waw.pl Sun Sep 29 00:59:42 CEST 2013 Previous message:

Re: [gmx-users] OPLS/AA + TIP5P, anybody?

2013-09-28 Thread gigo
Dear Chris, I am really grateful for your help. This is what I did, with additional LJ terms on LP1 and LP2 of tip5p: - 5000 steps of steepest descent with positions restraints on protein and flexible water (flexibility like in tip4p), - 5000 steps of steep, no restraints, flexible water, - 500

[gmx-users] OPLS/AA + TIP5P, anybody?

2013-09-28 Thread Christopher Neale
Dear Gigo: everything that I suggested was just ways that you might get a system without bad contacts to start your simulation with the proper (standard) tip5p model and oplsaa. I expected that combination to work together since they came out of the same lab, but looking at the initial tip5p pa

Re: [gmx-users] OPLS/AA + TIP5P, anybody?

2013-09-27 Thread gigo
Dear Chris, Thank you for your reply. I defined a new virtual atomtype (type D) with LJ sigma 1.72A ( 2*0.7+1.72=3.12, which is sigma of the oxygen) and played a bit with epsilon till the new LJ repulsion was able to prevent the build up of a huge force on the oxygen while interacting with dim

[gmx-users] OPLS/AA + TIP5P, anybody?

2013-09-26 Thread Christopher Neale
Dear Gigo: I've never used tip5p, but perhaps you could add some LJ terms to the opls_120 definition, do your minimization, then remove the fake LJ term on opls_120 and run your MD? If that doesn't work, then you might be able to minimize your system using FLEXIBLE tip3p water and then use a sc

Re: [gmx-users] OPLS/AA + TIP5P, anybody?

2013-09-24 Thread gigo
Dear Mark, Thank you for your reply. Unfortunately, TIP5P is completely rigid and the FLEXIBLE define will not change it. Any other ideas? Best, g On 2013-09-24 23:51, Mark Abraham wrote: You should be able to minimize with CG and TIP5P by eliminating constraints, by making the water use a fle

Re: [gmx-users] OPLS/AA + TIP5P, anybody?

2013-09-24 Thread Mark Abraham
You should be able to minimize with CG and TIP5P by eliminating constraints, by making the water use a flexible molecule, e.g. define = -DFLEXIBLE (or something). Check your water .itp file for how to do it. Mark On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:25 PM, gigo wrote: > Dear GMXers, > Since I am intereste

[gmx-users] OPLS/AA + TIP5P, anybody?

2013-09-24 Thread gigo
Dear GMXers, Since I am interested in interactions of lone electron pairs of water oxygen within the active site of an enzyme that I work on, I decided to give TIP5P a shot. I use OPLSAA. I run into troubles very fast trying to minimize freshly solvated system. I found on the gmx-users (http:/