Re: [gmx-users] Re: Question about embedding a force field with no torsion term

Hi,Zhou Bo Please take some time to get to know what's 1-4 interaction, and what is torsion. In simple words, they are of two types: 1-4 belonging to non-bonded interaction; torsion is bonded interaction. So in nature, they are not conflicting each other; The reason why we isolate the definition

Re: [gmx-users] Re: Question about embedding a force field with no torsion term

Bo Zhou wrote: > Thanks, Mark. Can you tell me any more in detail? No, because I don't know. However I know where to find out, and I pointed you there. > I am really somewhat > confused about it. I want to cooperate this force field with oplsaa, but it > looks strange that there is not any torsi

[gmx-users] Re: Question about embedding a force field with no torsion term

Thanks, Mark. Can you tell me any more in detail? I am really somewhat confused about it. I want to cooperate this force field with oplsaa, but it looks strange that there is not any torsion energy at all but can have 1-4 interactions. with " nrexcel=2", Do I still need 1-4 interactions made by the