[gmx-users] Re: openmm

2009-07-29 Thread Alan
Dear Mark, I've contacted the authors already. I decided to publish here as well just to close this topic. Alan On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 13:45, Alan wrote: > As I found out by test&error myself, mdrun-openmm will not work with > systems with more than one chain. > > Cheers, > Alan > > On Tue, Ju

Re: [gmx-users] Re: openmm

2009-07-29 Thread Mark Abraham
Alan wrote: As I found out by test&error myself, mdrun-openmm will not work with systems with more than one chain. Please contact the authors with this sort of feedback for them to put in their documentation. I'm not aware that they subscribe to this list. Mark __

[gmx-users] Re: openmm

2009-07-29 Thread Alan
As I found out by test&error myself, mdrun-openmm will not work with systems with more than one chain. Cheers, Alan On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 15:04, Alan wrote: > Dear all, > Zephyr (https://simtk.org/home/zephyr) is released, although only for Mac > and Windows so far, and it comes with examples

[gmx-users] Re: openmm

2009-07-28 Thread Alan
Dear all, Zephyr (https://simtk.org/home/zephyr) is released, although only for Mac and Windows so far, and it comes with examples, pretty neat. Even though there's some apparently fixes compared to the usual release of openmm and gromacs-openmm, my molecule didn't work with it yet. Nevertheless,

Re: [gmx-users] Re: openmm

2009-07-18 Thread Mark Abraham
Alan wrote: Thanks Justin. I could swear I tried what you said... anyway it worked now (2.5 x faster), but not with implicit solvent for mdrun-openmm... Trying with plain mdrun with the setup for implicit solvent and it seemed to work (although I don't know how to interpret this from GromacsOpen

[gmx-users] Re: openmm

2009-07-18 Thread Alan
Thanks Justin. I could swear I tried what you said... anyway it worked now (2.5 x faster), but not with implicit solvent for mdrun-openmm... Trying with plain mdrun with the setup for implicit solvent and it seemed to work (although I don't know how to interpret this from GromacsOpenMMPreview3-Mac

Re: [gmx-users] Re: openmm

2009-07-18 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Alan wrote: Ok, I tried. Can someone tell how to have in a mdp file this combination (in order to satisfy gromacs openmm) without raising a error in grompp? ns_type = simple pbc = no coulombtype = Reaction-Field Whatever I try I get: ERROR: Twin-range neighbour searching (NS) with simple NS

[gmx-users] Re: openmm

2009-07-18 Thread Alan
Ok, I tried. Can someone tell how to have in a mdp file this combination (in order to satisfy gromacs openmm) without raising a error in grompp? ns_type = simple pbc = no coulombtype = Reaction-Field Whatever I try I get: ERROR: Twin-range neighbour searching (NS) with simple NS algorithm not i

[gmx-users] Re: openmm

2009-07-18 Thread Alan
Dear Mark, Thanks. I reread those file carefully and noticed the "only implicit solvent". Sorry for that. I am building my test case here to see by myself how fast it can be. Alan On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 11:00, wrote: > Alan wrote: >> Hi list, does anyone have an example (input pdb, gmx comma