Thanks for the reply...
I calculated principal components per protein using the command
g_anaeig -f md.xtc -s md.tpr -v eigenvec.trr -eig eigenval.xvg -comp
eigcomp.xvg -rmsf eigrmsf.xvg -2d 2dproj.xvg -proj proj.xvg -tu ns
-extr extr.pdb -filt filt.xtc -first 1 -last 2
Also please suggest how one
Thanks for the reply...
I calculated principal components per protein using the command
g_anaeig -f md.xtc -s md.tpr -v eigenvec.trr -eig eigenval.xvg -comp
eigcomp.xvg -rmsf eigrmsf.xvg -2d 2dproj.xvg -proj proj.xvg -tu ns
-extr extr.pdb -filt filt.xtc -first 1 -last 2
Also please suggest how one
Hi Bipin,
It seems one of the proteins is taking longer to reach an equilibrium.
Maybe it is undergoing a conformational change?
Did you calculate the principal components per protein, or for the
joint trajectories? It would have been better to echo the commands you
used on the list, because it mi
Hello all,
I have done PCA from 50ns long trajectory for two similar proteins
(length 180 aa and RMSD 0.2 A).
The equilibration time and final simulation condition were identical
for both the protein.
But when I checked the cosine content for PC1 for both proteins they
were 0.9 and 0.5 respectivel
4 matches
Mail list logo