On 6/11/12 6:06 AM, Thales Kronenberger wrote:
Have you tryed online servers as http://davapc1.bioch.dundee.ac.uk/prodrg/ or
the Acpype (with Amber)?
For Gromos parameterization, ATB produces much better results than PRODRG.
http://compbio.biosci.uq.edu.au/atb/
Validation is always require
Have you tryed online servers as
http://davapc1.bioch.dundee.ac.uk/prodrg/or the Acpype (with Amber)?
2012/6/11 Marc Gordon
> Hello again fellow gromacs users.
>
> I am looking to model a glucose-rhamnose disaccharide using the 53a6
> forcefield. I wanted to take a look at the naming conventions
On 11/06/2012 6:11 PM, Marc Gordon wrote:
Hello again fellow gromacs users.
I am looking to model a glucose-rhamnose disaccharide using the 53a6
forcefield. I wanted to take a look at the naming conventions for
carbohydrates but I'm battling to find anything in the pdb2gmx force
field files.
Hello again fellow gromacs users.
I am looking to model a glucose-rhamnose disaccharide using the 53a6
forcefield. I wanted to take a look at the naming conventions for
carbohydrates but I'm battling to find anything in the pdb2gmx force field
files.
I downloaded a package of force fields from th
4 matches
Mail list logo