On 08/22/2012 03:58 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
On 8/22/12 9:54 AM, Albert wrote:
hello Justin:
thanks for reply.
I've checked this residue, it is close to protein but I am still
curious for
the value with 3.88. Even we also observe something 11, 13 which are
the same
weired to me. here
On 8/22/12 9:54 AM, Albert wrote:
hello Justin:
thanks for reply.
I've checked this residue, it is close to protein but I am still curious for
the value with 3.88. Even we also observe something 11, 13 which are the same
weired to me. here is the screen shot for this residue.
https://dl.
hello Justin:
thanks for reply.
I've checked this residue, it is close to protein but I am still
curious for the value with 3.88. Even we also observe something 11, 13
which are the same weired to me. here is the screen shot for this residue.
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/56271062/1.jpg
thanks
On 8/22/12 9:12 AM, Albert wrote:
hello Justin:
thanks for reply.
I've read both the paper and manual script. As indicated from the output, I
found the following line:
3684.2953.8840018217
I just wondering how could it possible fro residue 368 with a value of 3.88?
My guess wo
hello Justin:
thanks for reply.
I've read both the paper and manual script. As indicated from the
output, I found the following line:
3684.2953.8840018217
I just wondering how could it possible fro residue 368 with a value of 3.88?
For the pure lipids/water case, my apology for thi
On 8/22/12 3:16 AM, Albert wrote:
On 08/22/2012 08:23 AM, Mark Abraham wrote:
The authors use a 200x200 grid in their first published work with this tool.
What makes you think 20 is enough? (And even if it is enough, you still
haven't demonstrated another calculation showing that the APL with
On 08/22/2012 08:23 AM, Mark Abraham wrote:
The authors use a 200x200 grid in their first published work with this
tool. What makes you think 20 is enough? (And even if it is enough,
you still haven't demonstrated another calculation showing that the
APL with the embedded protein should be diff
On 22/08/2012 3:47 PM, Albert wrote:
On 08/22/2012 07:44 AM, Mark Abraham wrote:
I don't see how this relates to your claim that you computed a value
with GridMAT that doesn't relate to a value computed some other way.
Mark
HI Mark:
thanks for kind reply.
here is my parameter for for
On 08/22/2012 07:44 AM, Mark Abraham wrote:
I don't see how this relates to your claim that you computed a value
with GridMAT that doesn't relate to a value computed some other way.
Mark
And here is the results. As we can see The values is really low.
However, when I visulizaed the system i
On 08/22/2012 07:44 AM, Mark Abraham wrote:
I don't see how this relates to your claim that you computed a value
with GridMAT that doesn't relate to a value computed some other way.
Mark
HI Mark:
thanks for kind reply.
here is my parameter for for calculation. The vector values was tak
On 22/08/2012 3:34 PM, Albert wrote:
On 08/21/2012 08:25 AM, Mark Abraham wrote:
Since that calculation is one of the main purposes of GridMAT, I'd
suspect you're comparing two different quantities, or not calculating
one correctly.
Mark
--
I am very curious about this. The initial ALP for
On 08/21/2012 08:25 AM, Mark Abraham wrote:
Since that calculation is one of the main purposes of GridMAT, I'd
suspect you're comparing two different quantities, or not calculating
one correctly.
Mark
--
I am very curious about this. The initial ALP for my equilibrated POPC
system is someth
On 8/21/12 2:25 AM, Mark Abraham wrote:
On 21/08/2012 4:00 PM, Albert wrote:
Dear:
I am going to calculate the area/lipids for my membane system and I found
that GridMAT for area/lipids calculation is not that reliable since I
calculate by XY/(0.5 lipids number) for the pure well equilbirat
On 21/08/2012 4:00 PM, Albert wrote:
Dear:
I am going to calculate the area/lipids for my membane system and I
found that GridMAT for area/lipids calculation is not that reliable
since I calculate by XY/(0.5 lipids number) for the pure well
equilbirated POPC lipids system, my values is 67 w
Dear:
I am going to calculate the area/lipids for my membane system and I
found that GridMAT for area/lipids calculation is not that reliable
since I calculate by XY/(0.5 lipids number) for the pure well
equilbirated POPC lipids system, my values is 67 which is close to
experimental data bu
15 matches
Mail list logo