Re: [gmx-users] difference in force fields.

2011-11-17 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
swati patel wrote: helo justin, yess since i am dealing with a complex,so i generated protein topology using gromos96 43a1 force fields and for ligands,obtained topology using PRODRG which uses gromos 87 force fields. How to obtain similar force fields topologies since PRODRG only works w

[gmx-users] difference in force fields.

2011-11-17 Thread swati patel
helo justin, yess since i am dealing with a complex,so i generated protein topology using gromos96 43a1 force fields and for ligands,obtained topology using PRODRG which uses gromos 87 force fields. How to obtain similar force fields topologies since PRODRG only works with gromos87 force fields a