Hi Debashis,
Makes sure that the anion and receptor are together in the reference
structure you use for trjconv -pbc nojump
Cheers,
Tsjerk
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Debashis Sahu debashis.sah...@gmail.comwrote:
Dear All,
I have an problem related to jumping trajectory.
Your best bet is probably to center everything on the receptor. That will
prevent jumping of the receptor only, which is hopefully all you need.
-Trayder
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Tsjerk Wassenaar tsje...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Debashis,
Makes sure that the anion and receptor are
Dear All,
I have an problem related to jumping trajectory. In my MD
run, there is a receptor molecule which is binding with an halogen anion in
water solvent. In the original trajectory, the binding between them looks
fine but jumping present. To remove the jumping of the system from
Dear users,
I used the following commands to get diffusion constants (every 10 ns) of a
simulation of 100 ns . The number of frame is 5001 (write .xtc trajectory
every 20 ps). I looked at RMSD vs average structure, RMSD vs starting
structure, Radius of gyration, RMSD matrix. This simulation has
Hi Kenji,
You can remove the jumps/rewinds using 'trjconv -pbc nojump'.
Cheers,
Tsjerk
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 4:45 AM, Kenji Mochizuki kmo...@ims.ac.jp wrote:
Dear All
I have performed MD run with periodic boundary condition,
which system is consist of water and LJ particles.
I would
...@gmail.com
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users gmx-users@gromacs.org
Date: 2013-02-09 17:24:23
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Diffusion beyond periodic boundary
Hi Kenji,
You can remove the jumps/rewinds using 'trjconv -pbc nojump'.
Cheers,
Tsjerk
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 4:45 AM
Date: 2013-02-09 17:24:23
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Diffusion beyond periodic boundary
Hi Kenji,
You can remove the jumps/rewinds using 'trjconv -pbc nojump'.
Cheers,
Tsjerk
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 4:45 AM, Kenji Mochizuki kmo...@ims.ac.jp
wrote:
Dear All
I have
:17:12
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Diffusion beyond periodic boundary
Hi Kenji,
That's not possible. But why would you need that? It's not very hard to
make the changes required in gmx_trjconv.c
Cheers,
Tsjerk
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Kenji Mochizuki kmo...@ims.ac.jp wrote
Dear All
I have performed MD run with periodic boundary condition,
which system is consist of water and LJ particles.
I would like to know the time dependence of the dislocated distance (diffusion)
from the starting time (t=0).
Firstly, I made pdb file of the trajectory, then calculated the
Desr Gromacs Users,
I have several systems consist of: surfactants, solvent, and additives
molecules in several concentrations. I want obtain extent of movement each of
materials in the mixture in different concentrations. Is the self-diffusion
coefficient good foe this? I have doubt about
Hi,
I am working with DOPC lipid molecules, I was searching the literature for the
value of the diffusion coeffecient for DOPC. I could not find one. can some one
tell me what the value is is it close to (8.6 ± 0.2) × 10−12 m2/s?
Ramya Parthasarathi
ramya.sar...@aol.com
--
gmx-users
On 12/10/11 3:23 AM, Matthew Zwier wrote:
Hi Ruhollah,
A while ago on the list there was a discussion of extreme memory use
and possibly-incorrect results from g_msd under some conditions. The
problem could be worked around by imaging the trajectory with trjconv
first to remove jumps across
David,
thank you for your reply.
but, g_msd gives a diffusion coefficient which is one order of magnitude
higher than expected for a small polypeptide (15 res long with gyration Rg
~ 0.8nm) with the same size. this is command line i used:
g_msd-mpi -f md_mine_2nd.xtc -s md_mine_2nd.tpr -o
Hi Ruhollah,
A while ago on the list there was a discussion of extreme memory use
and possibly-incorrect results from g_msd under some conditions. The
problem could be worked around by imaging the trajectory with trjconv
first to remove jumps across the box, then running g_msd on the
results.
I want to calculate the diffusion coefficient of a small polypeptide with
g_msd (see here
http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/How-tos/Diffusion_Constant)
because of periodic boundary condition, when the peptide goes out of the
right side it comes in from left side, which leads to an artificial
On 9/12/2011 5:53 PM, Ruhollah Moussavi-Baygi wrote:
I want to calculate the diffusion coefficient of a small polypeptide
with g_msd (see here
http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/How-tos/Diffusion_Constant)
because of periodic boundary condition, when the peptide goes out of
the right side
On 2011-12-09 08:34, Mark Abraham wrote:
On 9/12/2011 5:53 PM, Ruhollah Moussavi-Baygi wrote:
I want to calculate the diffusion coefficient of a small polypeptide
with g_msd (see here
http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/How-tos/Diffusion_Constant)
because of periodic boundary condition, when
that this option exist in gromacs.
Unfortunately, it is not the case, so i will try your suggestions .
Stephane
--
Message: 6
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2011 10:17:10 -0500
From: chris.ne...@utoronto.ca
Subject: [gmx-users] diffusion of the water at the micelle surface
To: gmx
in gromacs. Unfortunately, it is not the case,
so i will try your suggestions .
Stephane
--
Message: 6
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2011 10:17:10 -0500
From: chris.neale at utoronto.ca
Subject: [gmx-users] diffusion of the water at the micelle surface
To: gmx-users at gromacs.org
When people do this for lipid bilayers, they compute depth-dependent
diffusion profiles (often diffusion is computed separately for lateral
diffusion and diffusion along the bilayer normal). Sounds like you
might do something similar. I doubt that the standard gromacs tools
will do this
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 11:17 PM, chris.ne...@utoronto.ca wrote:
When people do this for lipid bilayers, they compute depth-dependent
diffusion profiles (often diffusion is computed separately for lateral
diffusion and diffusion along the bilayer normal). Sounds like you might do
something
Hello,
I am studying the diffusion of a small molecule through a cyclic peptide
based nanotube using pull code, here is my code for pulling,
pull= umbrella
pull_geometry = position
pull_vec1 = 0 0 1
pull_start = yes
pull_ngroups= 1
pull_group0 = Protein
Hi
I calculated the diffusion coefficient for lysozyme and get ~4x1e-6 (cm2/s)
But, the experimental data is around 1x1e-6 (cm2/s).
How could I explain for this discrepency?
Thank you
Lin
--
gmx-users mailing listgmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Chih-Ying Lin wrote:
Hi
I calculated the diffusion coefficient for lysozyme and get ~4x1e-6 (cm2/s)
But, the experimental data is around 1x1e-6 (cm2/s).
How could I explain for this discrepency?
If the simulation is based off of a simulation of a single lysozyme protein in
water, I'd be
Hello,
I am trying to calculate the diffusion coefficient of a molecule in water using
g_msd, and I have a doubt:
I get 3 different values when I use the trajectory directly from the
simulation, the trajectory using PBC conditions, and the fitted trajectory.
Which would be the correct value for
Hello,
I'm investigating the diffusion coefficient of gases in liquids. Therefore, I
insert some molecules with the genbox tool in an equilibrated system. After a
NPT run to adjust the density, I'm running an NVT simulation to calculate the
diffusion coefficient (g_msd). MSD of the liquids are
Dear Users
I want to calculate the diffusion constant of one molecule in water.I make this
calculation in the followin way:
Obtaining a continuos trajectory
1) trjconv -f traj.trr -pbc nojump -o traj_nojump.xtc
Obtaining the msd of the solute, removing the center of mass of the system
Firt way:
Respected Experts
I need your help
In my study of diffusion of a oxygen molecule in 255 molecules of water, I
previously used SPC water model with ffgmx force field with cutoff L-J and
Coulomb interaction. I wanted to reproduce the experimental value 2.4 unit for
diffusion coefficient of
Sunil Thapa wrote:
Respected Experts
I need your help
In my study of diffusion of a oxygen molecule in 255 molecules of water,
I previously used SPC water model with ffgmx force field with cutoff L-J
and Coulomb interaction. I wanted to reproduce the experimental value
2.4 unit for
diffusion coefficient and it
combines well with the Gromos force fields, so use that.
It is well known that the diffusion of SPC is twice what it should be.
Berk
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 07:35:41 -0500
From: jalem...@vt.edu
To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] diffusion
Respected experts
I want to calculate the self diffusion cofficient of an oxygen molecule in
water. The experimental value in the literature is found to be 2.5 x 10-9 nm2/s
at 1atm pressure (density 997) and 25. I have considered cut-off Lennard Jones
interaction between water and oxygen. I
Sunil Thapa skrev:
Respected experts
I want to calculate the self diffusion cofficient of an oxygen
molecule in water. The experimental value in the literature is found
to be 2.5 x 10-9 nm2/s at 1atm pressure (density 997) and 25. I have
considered cut-off Lennard Jones interaction between
Hi,
If i remember correctly SPC/E water might be worth trying. There is plenty
of research paper in this field. Try this paper
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jp003020w
Also P,T coupling have effects on Diffusion Coeff.
amit
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 1:29 AM, Sunil Thapa mephy...@yahoo.com
Hi Everyone,
I have been trying to calculate diffusion coefficient for water. I am trying
to reproduce the numbers published in journal papers.
I am using SPCE water model. I use the g_msd analysis tool.
g_msd -f traj.trr -n index.ndx -s npt.tpr -b 2 -e 8
I use a box of volume 6x6x6 nm^3 which
Hi,
you already have your solution at hand.
On 10.02.2010, at 10:05, Amit Choubey wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I have been trying to calculate diffusion coefficient for water. I am trying
to reproduce the numbers published in journal papers.
I am using SPCE water model. I use the g_msd analysis
10 ps is too short of a trajectory, even for such a large system (for pure
water it is considered large). i would guess that it is a typing-error and
you ran for 10 ns?
omer.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:05, Amit Choubey kgp.a...@gmail.com wrote:
I use a box of volume 6x6x6 nm^3 which has 7161
Dear All,
I was trying to calculate diffusion of water molecule in a membrane
channel protein by g_msd utility of gromacs.
First I have identified channel waters which reside inside the channel
for 500ps (5000ps-5500ps simulation time).
Letter I have made a index file specifying these water
Dear GROMACS-ites,
I am trying to determine whether OPLS can be used to model gas-phase
ammonia. To this end, I created a 30 nm^3 box with 729 ammonia molecules
in it, performed energy minimization, and ran a simulation at 298K
1.01325 bar for 20 ps followed by another simulation of 20 ps
Darrell Koskinen wrote:
Dear GROMACS-ites,
I am trying to determine whether OPLS can be used to model gas-phase
ammonia. To this end, I created a 30 nm^3 box with 729 ammonia molecules
in it, performed energy minimization, and ran a simulation at 298K
1.01325 bar for 20 ps followed by
Hi users,
I have simulated a box of NVT-water, more specifically the flexible
urey-bradley-like TIPS-reparametrisation by Dang and Pettitt (1987).
What I notice is that the diffusion coefficient increases when I
calculate it from a longer snippet from my trajectory. If I use only 100
ps;
Erik Marklund wrote:
Hi users,
I have simulated a box of NVT-water, more specifically the flexible
urey-bradley-like TIPS-reparametrisation by Dang and Pettitt (1987).
What I notice is that the diffusion coefficient increases when I
calculate it from a longer snippet from my trajectory. If I
Dear all,
I am trying to calculate diffusion coefficients for a system of (30)
glycine molecules in a box with (1000) water.
After running:
g_msd -f md.xtc -s md.tpr -mol -n molindex.ndx
I get a list of diffusion coefficients - one for each glycine molecule.
I then calculate the average
Enemark Soeren wrote:
Dear all,
I am trying to calculate diffusion coefficients for a system of (30)
glycine molecules in a box with (1000) water.
After running:
g_msd –f md.xtc –s md.tpr –mol –n molindex.ndx
I get a list of diffusion coefficients – one for each glycine molecule.
I
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:12:16 +0200
From: sp...@xray.bmc.uu.se
To: gmx-users@gromacs.org
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] diffusion, g_msd and trestart
Enemark Soeren wrote:
Dear all,
I am trying to calculate diffusion coefficients for a system of (30)
glycine molecules in a box
-Original Message-
From: gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org
[mailto:gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org] On Behalf Of David van der Spoel
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 5:12 PM
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] diffusion, g_msd and trestart
Enemark Soeren wrote:
Dear all
-Original Message-
From: gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org
[mailto:gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org] On Behalf Of David van der Spoel
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 5:12 PM
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] diffusion, g_msd and trestart
Enemark Soeren wrote:
Dear all
Enemark Soeren wrote:
-Original Message-
From: gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org
[mailto:gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org] On Behalf Of David van der Spoel
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 5:12 PM
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] diffusion, g_msd and trestart
Enemark
On Jun 4, 2009, at 4:18 PM, Sarah Witzke wrote:
Dear gromacs users,
I have done several simulations with small lipophilic, molecules
diffusing into a DMPC bilayer.
I would like to calculate the diffusion coefficient of the molecules
inside the membrane, and therefore I looked at
:34
Til: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Emne: Re: [gmx-users] diffusion coefficient with g_msd
On Jun 4, 2009, at 4:18 PM, Sarah Witzke wrote:
Dear gromacs users,
I have done several simulations with small lipophilic, molecules
diffusing into a DMPC bilayer.
I would like to calculate
-users] diffusion coefficient with g_msd
On Jun 4, 2009, at 4:18 PM, Sarah Witzke wrote:
Dear gromacs users,
I have done several simulations with small lipophilic, molecules
diffusing into a DMPC bilayer.
I would like to calculate the diffusion coefficient of the molecules
inside
Fra: gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org på vegne af XAvier Periole
Sendt: fr 05-06-2009 13:32
Til: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Emne: Re: SV: [gmx-users] diffusion coefficient with g_msd
Sarah Witzke wrote:
Dear XAvier,
Thank you very much for your answer. I have posted my .mdp file
Sarah Witzke wrote:
Fra: gmx-users-boun...@gromacs.org på vegne af XAvier Periole
Sendt: fr 05-06-2009 13:32
Til: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Emne: Re: SV: [gmx-users] diffusion coefficient with g_msd
Sarah Witzke wrote:
Dear XAvier,
Thank you very much for your answer. I have
Dear gromacs users,
I have done several simulations with small lipophilic, molecules diffusing into
a DMPC bilayer.
I would like to calculate the diffusion coefficient of the molecules inside the
membrane, and therefore I looked at g_msd. The manual (version 4.0) states on
p. 250 (manual
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Diffusion coefficients ( Exp X Simul )
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users gmx-users@gromacs.org
Message-ID: 49ada3f0.4090...@xray.bmc.uu.se
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Eudes Fileti wrote:
Hello, someone could suggest me references
which
compounds and mixtures. Water is off more than the
other molecules IIRC.
eef
Message: 6
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 22:41:04 +0100
From: David van der Spoel sp...@xray.bmc.uu.se
mailto:sp...@xray.bmc.uu.se
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Diffusion coefficients ( Exp X Simul
See also the work of Hummer (JPC-B (2004),
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp0477147), dealing with box size effect on D.
Omer.
Koby Levy research group,
Weizmann Institute of Science.
http://www.weizmann.ac.il/sb/faculty_pages/Levy/
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 23:37, Eudes Fileti fil...@ufabc.edu.br
Hello, someone could suggest me references
which discusses the difficulty of obtaining
values for diffusion coefficients in agreement
to the experimental values? For water that
is well known, but I do not know of any
reference that discusses this topic
Thanks
eef
Eudes Fileti wrote:
Hello, someone could suggest me references
which discusses the difficulty of obtaining
values for diffusion coefficients in agreement
to the experimental values? For water that
is well known, but I do not know of any
reference that discusses this topic
You mean that
RESPECTABLE EXPERTS
HAPPY NEW YEAR
I am a beginner in gromacs. I want to know if it is possible to study the
diffusion of oxygen (as solute ) gas in water (solvent) with the current
features of gromacs.
Does gromacs present the required forcefields?
How can I make the corresponding pdb
Sunil Thapa wrote:
RESPECTABLE EXPERTS
HAPPY NEW YEAR
Please don't use all capitals - it's the internet equivalent of shouting.
I am a beginner in gromacs. I want to know if it is possible to study
the diffusion of oxygen (as solute ) gas in water (solvent) with the
current features of
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 07:18:17 +0200
Jojart Balazs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Minnale,
As far as i know, at least 100ns simulation should be performed in order to
obtain the correct diffusion coefficient for lipids. I think, if you
performed 5 ns it is too short.
I am not sure about that!
Hi to everybody!
I wanted to ask to you your opinion...
I've computed the diffusion coefficient of a aqueous solution solution of
Cd(2+) both with g_msd and g_velacc. I'have obtained a diff coeff of about 0.64
10^-5 cm^2/s and 0.71 10^-5 cm^2/s for two different water models (respectively
SPC/E
62 matches
Mail list logo