Re: [gmx-users] dihedral restraints in v3.3 different than v3.3.1 (or broken)

2008-01-28 Thread David Mobley
Chris, At one point the forces were incorrrect in the dihedral restraints. I *think* this was in 3.3 but one of the developers will probably know. I have a note to this effect in one of my publications too but I haven't the time to find it right now. David On Jan 26, 2008 10:43 PM, <[EMAIL PRO

Re: [gmx-users] dihedral restraints in v3.3 different than v3.3.1 (or broken)

2008-01-27 Thread Mark Abraham
Behnoush Zare wrote: Dear Dr. Neale, But I have got error in processing the top file. Fatal error: Ther were 1 error(s) processing your input I have referred to the manual and not found any thing about dihedral_restraints details. Would you please explain to me what I should do. Thank you v

Re: [gmx-users] dihedral restraints in v3.3 different than v3.3.1 (or broken)

2008-01-27 Thread Behnoush Zare
gromacs.org Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2008 10:13:42 AM (GMT+0330) Asia/Tehran Subject: [gmx-users] dihedral restraints in v3.3 different than v3.3.1 (or broken) This is just a notice for the archives. I was recently working on a new cluster where only gromacs 3.3 is installed. It took me a whi

[gmx-users] dihedral restraints in v3.3 different than v3.3.1 (or broken)

2008-01-26 Thread chris . neale
This is just a notice for the archives. I was recently working on a new cluster where only gromacs 3.3 is installed. It took me a while to figure out that the [ dihedral_restraints ] section is either differently implemented or broken in 3.3 compared to 3.3.1. Since the online list of revis