Hi Mark,
What you said reminds me to think deeply about my speculation. Thanks for
your remind and I hope to discuss it with you when I get some ideas on that.
Peng Wu
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Mark Abraham wrote:
> 吴鹏 wrote:
>
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> Haha. Yes, your words is right. My object
吴鹏 wrote:
Hi Mark,
Haha. Yes, your words is right. My objective is to study the interaction
between ions and walls. I think the ions may be attached in the wall so
the velocity getten from MD simulation is always bigger than the
continuum theory's prediction. So I want to build a simulation o
Hi Mark,
Haha. Yes, your words is right. My objective is to study the interaction
between ions and walls. I think the ions may be attached in the wall so the
velocity getten from MD simulation is always bigger than the continuum
theory's prediction. So I want to build a simulation on which ion can
?? wrote:
Hi GMX users,
I am doing a modified simulation which requires to eliminate an
interaction at certain direction while remain the interaction at other
directions. Since the itp files contain the C6 C12 of the interaction,
it is impossible to only remain the interaction a one direction
Hi GMX users,
I am doing a modified simulation which requires to eliminate an interaction
at certain direction while remain the interaction at other directions. Since
the itp files contain the C6 C12 of the interaction, it is impossible to
only remain the interaction a one direction while eliminat
5 matches
Mail list logo