Re: [gmx-users] gromacs/CPMD. Is LAM mandatory?

2011-03-31 Thread Elena Formoso
Thanks Christian That is why it was not working. It is not possible to run both in parallel Cheers Elena On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Christian Seifert < cseif...@bph.ruhr-uni-bochum.de> wrote: > Hi Elena, > > if you use GMX/CPMD in parallel, you can use any mpi implementation, but > you

Re: [gmx-users] gromacs/CPMD. Is LAM mandatory?

2011-03-31 Thread Christian Seifert
Hi Elena, if you use GMX/CPMD in parallel, you can use any mpi implementation, but you should start GMX on a single core and CPMD in parallel (via runcpmd). You can not run both in parallel. Greets, Christian On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 13:05 +0200, Elena Formoso wrote: > Dear all, > I am trying to do

Re: [gmx-users] gromacs/CPMD. Is LAM mandatory?

2011-03-31 Thread Mark Abraham
On 31/03/11, Elena Formoso wrote: > Dear all, > I am trying to do a QM/MM calculation with gromacs/CPMD. When I > try to use a parallel version of mdrun and CPMD I get a segmentation fault. > I have seen in the examples that LAM is used in runcpmd. It is mandatory for > parallel runs? > LAM

[gmx-users] gromacs/CPMD. Is LAM mandatory?

2011-03-31 Thread Elena Formoso
Dear all, I am trying to do a QM/MM calculation with gromacs/CPMD. When I try to use a parallel version of mdrun and CPMD I get a segmentation fault. I have seen in the examples that LAM is used in runcpmd. It is mandatory for parallel runs? I do not have this problem when I run just CPMD in paral

[gmx-users] gromacs/CPMD. Is LAM mandatory?

2011-03-30 Thread Elena Formoso
Hi I am trying to do a QM/MM calculation with gromacs/CPMD. When I try to use a parallel version of mdrun and CPMD I get a segmentation fault. I have seen in the examples that LAM is used in runcpmd. It is mandatory for parallel runs? Thanks *** Elena ETH Zürich an