Re: [gmx-users] on tpbconv

2012-09-30 Thread rama david
Yes it will work .. Just at the time of mdrun add -cpi cpt ( prvious cpt file ) With best wishes and regards..!! On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Acoot Brett acootbr...@yahoo.com wrote: Dear All, for my original MD, based on mdp file the total time is 500 ps. After it finished, I have

[gmx-users] on tpbconv

2012-09-29 Thread Acoot Brett
Dear All, for my original MD, based on mdp file the total time is 500 ps. After it finished, I have decided to extend the MD run to 2.5 ns. I think the following command should be used: tpbconv -s original500ps.tpr -extend 2000 -o md-0.5ns-to-2.5ns.tpr But as for in the original mdp file

[gmx-users] g_dipoles + tpbconv

2011-06-02 Thread Nilesh Dhumal
Hello, I have a system with a glucose molecule. I want to calculate the dipole moment of a particular OH in glucose molecule.I made an index file which have a group containing atoms. [ O8 ] 8 18 10 is oxygen no. and 20 is hydroen no. But, if I try to use g_dipoles to get the dipole

Re: [gmx-users] g_dipoles + tpbconv

2011-06-02 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Nilesh Dhumal wrote: Hello, I have a system with a glucose molecule. I want to calculate the dipole moment of a particular OH in glucose molecule.I made an index file which have a group containing atoms. [ O8 ] 8 18 10 is oxygen no. and 20 is hydroen no. I'm assuming you mean 8 is

[gmx-users] Re: tpbconv extension

2010-12-13 Thread ram bio
Dear Gromacs users, I am running a CG simulation for a peptide in lipid bilayer, and the run didnot extend after 42000 ps using gromacs 4.0.7, Reading toplogy and shit from memb12extnr42000ns.tpr Extending remaining runtime of by 1e+06 ps (now -2144967266 steps) You've simulated long enough. Not

Re: [gmx-users] Re: tpbconv extension

2010-12-13 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
ram bio wrote: Dear Gromacs users, I am running a CG simulation for a peptide in lipid bilayer, and the run didnot extend after 42000 ps using gromacs 4.0.7, Reading toplogy and shit from memb12extnr42000ns.tpr Extending remaining runtime of by 1e+06 ps (now -2144967266 steps) You've

Re: [gmx-users] Re: tpbconv extension

2010-12-13 Thread ram bio
Hi Justin, The command was: tpbconv -s memb12extnr42000ns.tpr -extend 100 -o memb12extnr43000ns.tpr Thanks Ram On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Justin A. Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote: ram bio wrote: Dear Gromacs users, I am running a CG simulation for a peptide in lipid bilayer,

Re: [gmx-users] Re: tpbconv extension

2010-12-13 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
ram bio wrote: Hi Justin, The command was: tpbconv -s memb12extnr42000ns.tpr -extend 100 -o memb12extnr43000ns.tpr Try using -nsteps instead. There are issues with -extend and -until (bad rounding, limits to the size of the number, etc) that can cause this problem. I believe all

RE: [gmx-users] Re: tpbconv extension

2010-12-13 Thread Berk Hess
? Berk Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:40:50 -0500 From: jalem...@vt.edu To: gmx-users@gromacs.org Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Re: tpbconv extension ram bio wrote: Hi Justin, The command was: tpbconv -s memb12extnr42000ns.tpr -extend 100 -o memb12extnr43000ns.tpr Try using

RE: [gmx-users] Re: tpbconv extension

2010-12-13 Thread Berk Hess
Hi, I fixed the bug for 4.5.4. If you want an unlimited number of steps, use: tpbconv -nsteps -1 Berk From: g...@hotmail.com To: gmx-users@gromacs.org Subject: RE: [gmx-users] Re: tpbconv extension Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 17:44:53 +0100 Hi, No this is actually a bug in tpbconv

Re: [gmx-users] Re: tpbconv extension

2010-12-13 Thread ram bio
Hi Justin and Berk, Thanks for the suggestions. I am using gromacs 4.0.7 single precision, and would like to extend my run each time by 1 microsec as it fits into the wall time on the server for my system. Please suggest. Thanks Ram On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Justin A. Lemkul

RE: [gmx-users] Re: tpbconv extension

2010-12-13 Thread Berk Hess
reasons), you might want to consider upgrading to 4.5.3 (and possibly applying the bug-fix I mailed before). Berk Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 17:56:43 +0100 Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Re: tpbconv extension From: rmbio...@gmail.com To: jalem...@vt.edu; gmx-users@gromacs.org CC: Hi Justin and Berk

Re: [gmx-users] Re: tpbconv extension

2010-12-13 Thread ram bio
(and possibly applying the bug-fix I mailed before). Berk Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 17:56:43 +0100 Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Re: tpbconv extension From: rmbio...@gmail.com To: jalem...@vt.edu; gmx-users@gromacs.org CC: Hi Justin and Berk, Thanks for the suggestions. I am using gromacs 4.0.7 single

RE: [gmx-users] Re: tpbconv extension

2010-12-13 Thread Berk Hess
many core and 4.5.3 will also improve your performance. Berk Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 18:16:28 +0100 Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Re: tpbconv extension From: rmbio...@gmail.com To: gmx-users@gromacs.org Hi Berk, Thanks for the suggestion, does the tpr file generated by the options mention on PC

[gmx-users] Re:Re: tpbconv -zeroq results all coulombic energies to zero

2010-12-03 Thread BIN ZHANG
Dear David: Thanks a lot for your reply. You are absolutely right! All the charges in the tpr file is zero now. This does not make much sense to me though, as the group I selected with tpbconv does not include all the atoms. I also tried to use other groups such as POPC or Protein and

[gmx-users] Using tpbconv

2006-06-29 Thread Joanne Hanna
Hi I have always used tpbconv to do my restarts however after reading the newer documentation, I have noticed that it only mentions that the energy file can be used with Pressure Coupling or Noose Hoover temperature coupling, so what is the correct usage when using berendsen temperature