hi,
On Thursday, 3. May 2007 09:03, Mark Abraham wrote:
> David van der Spoel wrote:
> > The one single reason for combining these things would be the abilitiy
> > to reuse Joomla passwords. We already have separate passwords for
> > bugzilla, website and mailing lists. On the other hand since br
David van der Spoel wrote:
The one single reason for combining these things would be the abilitiy
to reuse Joomla passwords. We already have separate passwords for
bugzilla, website and mailing lists. On the other hand since browsers
memorize passwords for you it may not be that big a deal.
W
Mark Abraham wrote:
Dallas B. Warren wrote:
FYI, MediaWiki is the one used by Wikipedia (plus the one that use /
know). There are others.
In terms of integration with a Joomla site, I don't think there is
anything very good that works with MediaWiki. Was one floating around
awhile ago, a comp
Dallas B. Warren wrote:
FYI, MediaWiki is the one used by Wikipedia (plus the one that use /
know). There are others.
In terms of integration with a Joomla site, I don't think there is
anything very good that works with MediaWiki. Was one floating around
awhile ago, a component, but it didn't
FYI, MediaWiki is the one used by Wikipedia (plus the one that use /
know). There are others.
In terms of integration with a Joomla site, I don't think there is
anything very good that works with MediaWiki. Was one floating around
awhile ago, a component, but it didn't do a very good job (wiki i
Discussion list for GROMACS users
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] GROMACS Wiki
Erik and all,
I think this is a great idea. I've been working on (and plans to work
more on) a bit of a free energy wiki/tutorial page beyond what's
already available; depending on how this develops I can
transfer/c
Erik and all,
I think this is a great idea. I've been working on (and plans to work
more on) a bit of a free energy wiki/tutorial page beyond what's
already available; depending on how this develops I can
transfer/combine with what's already on the wiki.
As you probably know there are lots of th
Hi,
On May 2, 2007, at 10:01 AM, David van der Spoel wrote:
In all these things the format is less of an issue than the
content. The current website runs on Joomla and selected registered
users can edit parts of it.
Just read Erik's answer (that happens when you run away in the
middle
Dallas B. Warren wrote:
It's a good idea, but I don't think it will help a great
deal. The main
problem with frequently-occurring questions is that the
askers haven't
read the manual, the man pages, the web page, the FAQ or searched the
mailing list archives. In context, a Wiki would just be
Hi Dallas/Mark,
Actually, we can give it a try - I'll see if I have time to set
something up this week(end) and then assign all of you guys as
editors/admins too :-)
A wiki is most probably better than a forum, too. The main reason we
passed on the forum idea was that many users would onl
> It's a good idea, but I don't think it will help a great
> deal. The main
> problem with frequently-occurring questions is that the
> askers haven't
> read the manual, the man pages, the web page, the FAQ or searched the
> mailing list archives. In context, a Wiki would just be one
> more t
Dallas B. Warren wrote:
Have the developers thought of having a wiki set up for GROMACS?
Then users out there not directly involved in the development could help
to develop resources that should take care of many of the frequent
questions people have, in an easy location.
It's a good idea, but
12 matches
Mail list logo
