RE: [gmx-users] invalid order of directive moleule type

2006-11-09 Thread Dallas B. Warren
Thanks for the valueable suggessions, but sir i am actually want to use this program for small molecules. I have taken single FAD molecule as u suggested modified the atom type as described in ffgmx.rtp, program results top and gro files using pdb2gmx, but while running grompp i am

Re: [gmx-users] invalid order of directive moleule type

2006-11-08 Thread harpreet singh
-users@gromacs.org To: Discussion list for GROMACS users gmx-users@gromacs.org Subject: Re: [gmx-users] invalid order of directive moleule type Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 13:00:02 +0100 if i were you, i would rather adapt my pdb file to an existing forcefield as ffgmx, than trying to generate a new

Re: [gmx-users] invalid order of directive moleule type

2006-11-07 Thread merc mertens
if i were you, i would rather adapt my pdb file to an existing forcefield as ffgmx, than trying to generate a new forcefield that fits to your pdb with prodrug. the first option seems much easier to me. what i mean is, if you change the names of you FAD atoms to the ones you see in the *rtp

Re: [gmx-users] invalid order of directive moleule type

2006-11-07 Thread Anton Feenstra
harpreet singh wrote: Fatal error: Atom O1P in residue FAD 1 not found in rtp entry with 61 atoms while sorting atoms On comparing topology file (ffgmx.rtp) for FAD entry i was surpried to see that it has atom type enteries OP1, OP2 instead of O1P, O2P in downloaded PDB file

Re: [gmx-users] invalid order of directive moleule type

2006-11-07 Thread Tsjerk Wassenaar
Hi Harpreet, Regarding the message invalid order ..., check the archives of this mailing list. Further note that you shouldn't use the gmx (ffgmx) force field, but should choose one of the Gromos force fields (united atom), OPLS or Encad (all-atom). Specific to your problem is that there is a