erties to the MB should I consider for such system ?
>>
>> James
>>
>>
>> 2013/5/28 lloyd riggs
>>
>>> Dear Dr. Pali,
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> Stephan Watkins
>>>
>>> *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 28. Mai 2013 um
kins
>>
>> *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 28. Mai 2013 um 19:50 Uhr
>> *Von:* "Szilárd Páll"
>>
>> *An:* "Discussion list for GROMACS users"
>> *Betreff:* Re: Re: [gmx-users] GPU-based workstation
>> Dear all,
>>
>> As far as I un
the MB should I consider for such system ?
James
2013/5/28 lloyd riggs
> Dear Dr. Pali,
>
> Thank you,
>
> Stephan Watkins
>
> *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 28. Mai 2013 um 19:50 Uhr
> *Von:* "Szilárd Páll"
>
> *An:* "Discussion list for GROMACS users"
Dear Dr. Pali,
Thank you,
Stephan Watkins
Gesendet: Dienstag, 28. Mai 2013 um 19:50 Uhr
Von: "Szilárd Páll"
An: "Discussion list for GROMACS users"
Betreff: Re: Re: [gmx-users] GPU-based workstation
Dear all,
As far as I understand, the OP is interested in h
mx.ch>>
> Reply-To: Discussion users
> mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org>>
> Date: Saturday, 25 May 2013 12:02
> To: Discussion users mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org>>
> Subject: Aw: Re: [gmx-users] GPU-based workstation
>
> More RAM the better, and the best I have s
for 1 ns sim, but tried simple large 800 amino, 25,000 solvent
> eq (NVT or NPT) runs and they clock at around 1 hour real for say 50 ps
> eq's
>
> Stephan
>
> Gesendet: Samstag, 25. Mai 2013 um 07:54 Uhr
> Von: "James Starlight"
> An: "Discussion
r
> *Von:* "James Starlight"
>
> *An:* "Discussion list for GROMACS users"
> *Betreff:* Re: Aw: Re: [gmx-users] GPU-based workstation
> Richard,
>
> thanks for suggestion!
>
> Assuming that I'm using 2 high end GeForce's what performance b
o the exact same performance the other person had.
Stephan
Gesendet: Samstag, 25. Mai 2013 um 15:19 Uhr
Von: "James Starlight"
An: "Discussion list for GROMACS users"
Betreff: Re: Aw: Re: [gmx-users] GPU-based workstation
Richard,
thanks for suggestion!
Assuming that I
arlight"
An: "Discussion list for GROMACS users"
Betreff: Re: Aw: Re: [gmx-users] GPU-based workstation
Richard,
thanks for suggestion!
Assuming that I'm using 2 high end GeForce's what performance be better
1) in case of one i7 (4 or 6 nodes ) ?
2) in case of 8 core
; Reply-To: Discussion users gmx-users@gromacs.org>>
> Date: Saturday, 25 May 2013 12:02
> To: Discussion users mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org>>
> Subject: Aw: Re: [gmx-users] GPU-based workstation
>
> More RAM the better, and the best I have seen is 4 GPU work statio
E5
or core i7 would be a good choice.
Richard
From: lloyd riggs mailto:lloyd.ri...@gmx.ch>>
Reply-To: Discussion users mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org>>
Date: Saturday, 25 May 2013 12:02
To: Discussion users mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org>>
Subject: Aw: Re: [gmx-users] GPU-based works
r real for say 50 ps eq's
Stephan
Gesendet: Samstag, 25. Mai 2013 um 07:54 Uhr
Von: "James Starlight"
An: "Discussion list for GROMACS users"
Betreff: Re: [gmx-users] GPU-based workstation
Dear Dr. Watkins!
Thank you for the suggestions!
In the local shops I
Dear Dr. Watkins!
Thank you for the suggestions!
In the local shops I've found only Core i7 with 6 cores (like Core
i7-39xx) and 4 cores. Should I obtain much better performance with 6 cores
than with 4 cores in case of i7 cpu (assuming that I run simulation in
cpu+gpu mode )?
Also you've ment
13 matches
Mail list logo
