On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Jones de Andrade johanne...@gmail.comwrote:
Really?
Of course. With openmp gets to use all your cores for PME+bondeds+stuff
while the GPU does PP. Any version without openmp gets to use one core per
domain, which is bad.
An what about gcc+mpi? should I
Ok, you convinced me. I'll really give it a try. I'm following this throw
the suposition that openMP implementation on intel compilers is not as good
as GNU compilers. I already tested intel openMP in our cluster, and it just
sucked in comparison to the pure MPI compilation.
Let's hope I can make
icc and CUDA is pretty painful. I'd suggest getting latest gcc.
Mark
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 2:42 PM, ahmed.sa...@stfc.ac.uk wrote:
Hi,
I'm having trouble compiling v 4.6.3 with GPU support using CUDA 5.5.22.
The configuration runs okay and I have made sure that I have set paths
Did it a few days ago. Not so much of a problem here.
But I compiled everything, including fftw, with it. The only error I got
was that I should turn off the separable compilation, and that the user
must be in the group video.
My settings are (yes, I know it should go better with openmp, but
You will do much better with gcc+openmp than icc-openmp!
Mark
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 9:17 PM, Jones de Andrade johanne...@gmail.comwrote:
Did it a few days ago. Not so much of a problem here.
But I compiled everything, including fftw, with it. The only error I got
was that I should turn
Really? An what about gcc+mpi? should I expect any improvement?
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Mark Abraham mark.j.abra...@gmail.comwrote:
You will do much better with gcc+openmp than icc-openmp!
Mark
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 9:17 PM, Jones de Andrade johanne...@gmail.com
wrote:
Did it
6 matches
Mail list logo
