[gmx-users] compiling gromacs4.5 with gpu

2010-09-28 Thread BIN ZHANG
Hi, there: I was trying to compile gromacs4.5.1 on a GPU cluster (https://secure.nersc.gov/nusers/systems/dirac/ ). The compilation seems to work fine, but in the installation folder, only bin/mdrun-gpu presents. Is it supposed to be so? When I type ./mdrun-gpu -h, the following error

Re: [gmx-users] MPI and dual-core laptop

2010-09-28 Thread Carsten Kutzner
Hi, if you only want to use the two processors of you laptop you can simple leave away the --enable-mpi flag. Then it will work in parallel using threads. Use mdrun -nt 2 -s ... to specify two threads. If you anyhow want to compile with MPI, take a look at the config.log file (search for 'Cannot

[gmx-users] Reg: Liquid-liquid interface simulation

2010-09-28 Thread vinothkumar mohanakrishnan
Hi all Is that any one have liquid-liquid interface simulation (like lysozyme by justin). if so kindly share it through this discussiion forum.it will be of great help for the newusers like me to use gromacs for liquid-liquid interface simulation. Regards Vinoth -- gmx-users mailing list

Re: [gmx-users] MPI and dual-core laptop

2010-09-28 Thread Florian Dommert
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/27/2010 08:42 PM, simon sham wrote: Hi, I wanted to test the GROMACS MPI version in my dual-processors laptop. I have installed openmpi 1.4.2 version. However, when I tried to configure GROMACS 4.5.1 with --enable-mpi option, I got the

Re: [gmx-users] Reg: Liquid-liquid interface simulation

2010-09-28 Thread David van der Spoel
On 2010-09-28 09.58, vinothkumar mohanakrishnan wrote: Hi all Is that any one have liquid-liquid interface simulation (like lysozyme by justin). if so kindly share it through this discussiion forum.it http://forum.it will be of great help for the newusers like me to use gromacs for

RE: [gmx-users] MPI and dual-core laptop

2010-09-28 Thread Berk Hess
Hi, You don't need MPI within one machine. Gromacs 4.5 has a built in thread-mpi library that gets built automatically. Berk Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:22:30 +0200 From: domm...@icp.uni-stuttgart.de To: gmx-users@gromacs.org Subject: Re: [gmx-users] MPI and dual-core laptop -BEGIN

[gmx-users] g_rdf normalization

2010-09-28 Thread Enemark Soeren
Dear fellow Gromacs users Does anyone know how the -surf mol option works? I am trying to calculate the coordination number for a molecule in a slice (xy-plane, delta-z ~ 0.5 nm) of my system. I believe I understand how to do the integration of the RDF function if I use the center-of-mass

[gmx-users] topology file for two molecules

2010-09-28 Thread Gavin Melaugh
Hi all I want to run a simulation of one tert-pentane molecule inside one organic cage molecule. I have the topology files for both molecules but obviously I only need one .top file as the input for grompp. What is the most convenient way of having both topologies in one file? Many Thanks Gavin

RE: [gmx-users] g_rdf normalization

2010-09-28 Thread Berk Hess
Hi, g_rdf -surf mol counts the number of atoms within a distance r from the surface, i.e. the atoms which have a distance of less than r to the closest atom of the molecule. Since the surface can be complex and dynamic, normalization is difficult. Berk From: ch...@nus.edu.sg To:

Re: [gmx-users] topology file for two molecules

2010-09-28 Thread Mark Abraham
Look up the include file mechanism on the webpage. Mark - Original Message - From: Gavin Melaugh gmelaug...@qub.ac.uk Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 19:04 Subject: [gmx-users] topology file for two molecules To: Discussion list for GROMACS users gmx-users@gromacs.org Hi all I

Re: [gmx-users] topology file for two molecules

2010-09-28 Thread Gavin Melaugh
Hi Mark. I have looked this up, but I am a little uncertain. Does one of the topologies have to be included within the other as an .itp file. If so do I only define the [defaults directive] in the .top file i.e. I take it I don't include this directive in the .itp file as well. Cheers Gavin

Re: [gmx-users] Reg: Liquid-liquid interface simulation

2010-09-28 Thread vinothkumar mohanakrishnan
Is there any tutorial for liquid-liquid interface in any of the website?. Regards Vinoth On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 2:01 PM, David van der Spoel sp...@xray.bmc.uu.sewrote: On 2010-09-28 09.58, vinothkumar mohanakrishnan wrote: Hi all Is that any one have liquid-liquid interface simulation

Re: [gmx-users] Reg: Liquid-liquid interface simulation

2010-09-28 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
vinothkumar mohanakrishnan wrote: Is there any tutorial for liquid-liquid interface in any of the website?. If you can't find it at http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Tutorials or with Google, then it probably doesn't exist. -Justin Regards Vinoth On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 2:01 PM,

Re: [gmx-users] topology file for two molecules

2010-09-28 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Gavin Melaugh wrote: Hi Mark. I have looked this up, but I am a little uncertain. Does one of the topologies have to be included within the other as an .itp file. If so No. You #include .itp files to simply add molecules within a .top; it would be very rare to #include an .itp within an

Re: [gmx-users] topology file for two molecules

2010-09-28 Thread Gavin Melaugh
Hi Justin Cheers. I have attached my pentane itp file. The cage itp is formatted the same. In the examples there never seems to be [atom types] included. I have included it. Does it seem O.K? Gavin Justin A. Lemkul wrote: Gavin Melaugh wrote: Hi Mark. I have looked this up, but I am a

Re: [gmx-users] topology file for two molecules

2010-09-28 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Gavin Melaugh wrote: Hi Justin Cheers. I have attached my pentane itp file. The cage itp is formatted the same. In the examples there never seems to be [atom types] included. I have included it. Does it seem O.K? You only need to use an [atomtypes] directive if you're introducing new atom

Re: [gmx-users] Reg: Liquid-liquid interface simulation

2010-09-28 Thread vinothkumar mohanakrishnan
why don't someone can post the tutorial in the gromacs website? because gromacs was heavily used for liquid-liquid interface simulation.I hope probably i will do it in the near future. Regards Vinoth On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Justin A. Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote: vinothkumar

Re: [gmx-users] topology file for two molecules

2010-09-28 Thread Gavin Melaugh
O.K Cheers Gavin Justin A. Lemkul wrote: Gavin Melaugh wrote: Hi Justin Cheers. I have attached my pentane itp file. The cage itp is formatted the same. In the examples there never seems to be [atom types] included. I have included it. Does it seem O.K? You only need to use an

Re: [gmx-users] Salt concentration

2010-09-28 Thread Anthony Cruz Balberdi
Thank you Gonçalo and Dallas for your help. Best Regards Anthony 2010/9/27 Gonçalo C. Justino goncalo.just...@gmail.com: Hi Anthony, You can use the '-conc' tag from genion during file preparation, as per http://manual.gromacs.org/current/online/genion.html. Gonçalo On 27 September 2010

[gmx-users] Grompp Error : Segmentation fault

2010-09-28 Thread Alep Latep
Dear Gromacs Users and Developers, I'm currently using Gromacs 4.5 on a Fedora 12 i686 to performed my ionic liquid MD simulation using amber 99 force field. I got my topology from topolbuild v 1.3. I successfully minimized both cation and anion separately using cg and steep. Then I include the

Re: [gmx-users] topology file for two molecules

2010-09-28 Thread Gavin Melaugh
Hi Justin I Did the following and it worked. You were right about using one atom types directive. If you don't mind I have another query. In all my topology files to date (one molecule type), I have always listed the atomtypes in the [atomtypes] directive, and used the set up in [defaults] below.

Re: [gmx-users] Grompp Error : Segmentation fault

2010-09-28 Thread Florian Dommert
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I am really curious that amber has support for Room Temperature Ionic liquids ? Can you please provide me a reference how this force field works for this kind of liquids. /Flo On 09/28/2010 03:01 PM, Alep Latep wrote: Dear Gromacs Users

Re: [gmx-users] Reg: Liquid-liquid interface simulation

2010-09-28 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
vinothkumar mohanakrishnan wrote: why don't someone can post the tutorial in the gromacs website? because The implication from my previous message was that, if you cannot find a tutorial in an obvious place, one does not exist. There is not a tutorial for every task that a user may wish

Re: [gmx-users] topology file for two molecules

2010-09-28 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Gavin Melaugh wrote: Hi Justin I Did the following and it worked. You were right about using one atom types directive. If you don't mind I have another query. In all my topology files to date (one molecule type), I have always listed the atomtypes in the [atomtypes] directive, and used the

Re: [gmx-users] topology file for two molecules

2010-09-28 Thread Gavin Melaugh
Justin Cheers, I had just posted a more general query prior to you getting back? It is perhaps not as vague. Gavin Justin A. Lemkul wrote: Gavin Melaugh wrote: Hi Justin I Did the following and it worked. You were right about using one atom types directive. If you don't mind I have

Re: [gmx-users] Hardware-specific crash with 4.5.1

2010-09-28 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Roland Schulz wrote: On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Mark Abraham mark.abra...@anu.edu.au mailto:mark.abra...@anu.edu.au wrote: - Original Message - From: Justin A. Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu mailto:jalem...@vt.edu Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 11:39 Subject:

Re: [gmx-users] compiling gromacs4.5 with gpu

2010-09-28 Thread Roland Schulz
Hi, yes that is a bug with cmake (see http://bugzilla.gromacs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=549). You can either disable BUILD_SHARED_LIBS and or you can ran make install as a workaround until the bug is fixed. Roland On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 3:02 AM, BIN ZHANG zhn...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, there: I was

Re: [gmx-users] Grompp Error : Segmentation fault

2010-09-28 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
Roland Schulz wrote: Please make sure that the error exists in the latest version. Either 4.5.1 or if you know how please check the latest GIT version from release-4-5-patches. If you still get the error with the latest version, please file a bugzilla report and attach all required files.

[gmx-users] Looking for force field for metal oxides

2010-09-28 Thread Sanku M
Dear gromacs users, I was planning to study the interaction of a peptide with a zinc oxide ( ZnO) surface. So, I was wondering whether there is any forcefield for metal oxide especially for Zinc Oxide ( ZnO) in literarure that you can suggest that can be used in combination with

[gmx-users] Re: MPI and dual-core laptop

2010-09-28 Thread simon sham
Hi, I was finally able to get my MPI GROMACS running on my laptop. Thanks for all those who have provided invaluable suggestions.    Best,   Simon Sham  --- On Mon, 9/27/10, simon sham ssha...@yahoo.com wrote: From: simon sham ssha...@yahoo.com Subject: MPI and dual-core laptop To:

[gmx-users] Fw: g_hbond segmentation fault

2010-09-28 Thread Yao Yao
-- Found 1048 different hydrogen bonds in trajectory Found 2292 different atom-pairs within hydrogen bonding distance Merging hbonds with Acceptor and Donor swapped 2/10915Segmentation fault __ Hi guys, I got the msg like above

Re: [gmx-users] Fw: g_hbond segmentation fault

2010-09-28 Thread Erik Marklund
Yao Yao skrev 2010-09-28 19.25: -- Found 1048 different hydrogen bonds in trajectory Found 2292 different atom-pairs within hydrogen bonding distance Merging hbonds with Acceptor and Donor swapped 2/10915Segmentation fault

Re: [gmx-users] Fw: g_hbond segmentation fault

2010-09-28 Thread Yao Yao
Hi Erik, Sorry about that, I did not notice it. I used the command line, g_hbond -f test.trr -s test.tpr -ac test.xvg -e 100 -dt 1 Thanks, Yao --- On Tue, 9/28/10, Erik Marklund er...@xray.bmc.uu.se wrote: From: Erik Marklund er...@xray.bmc.uu.se Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Fw: g_hbond

[gmx-users] topolbuild cannot open logfile

2010-09-28 Thread andrew_m_norris
Hello i am very new to molecular mechanics so please excuse me if my questions are a little naive or stupid.I am trying to minimise a mol2 file with topolbuild1_3 using the following command line arguments from within the topolbuild directory:  ./topolbuild  -dir

[gmx-users] about pull_init and pull_start

2010-09-28 Thread zhongjin
Hi all, I am sorry to ask such a question,may it seems very stupid, but I am very confused about it. pull_init is the reference distance at t=0. the reference distance is the distance between the pull group and the reference group? This is a single value, except for geometry position which

Re: [gmx-users] about pull_init and pull_start

2010-09-28 Thread Justin A. Lemkul
zhongjin wrote: Hi all, I am sorry to ask such a question,may it seems very stupid, but I am very confused about it. pull_init is the reference distance at t=0. the reference distance is the distance between the pull group and the reference group? This is a single value, except for geometry