Hi,
   I was using gromacs 4.0.7 to calculate the scattering intensity of polymer 
solvated in a solvent. But, I found a discrepancy in the normalization of the 
calculation when considering only a subset
  of  the entire system ( e.g . only solute from the entire solution) :
This is what I found:

 I  first tried to calculate the scattering intensity of  *only* the polymer ( 
i.e the solute) using trajectory file of the entire solution and .tpr file of 
the entire solution using an index file as shown below

g_rdf_4mpi -s topol -f traj -noxvgr -n -sq sq_polymer_only  << EOF
 6
 EOF
( Here index-group 6 is the entire polymer).

But, then I  generated  a .tpr file *only* for the solute ( i.e no solvent) and 
used trjconv to generate the .xtc file *only* for the solute 

trjconv_4mpi -s topol.tpr -f traj.xtc -n index.ndx -o traj_polymer_only.xtc


Now, If I try to calculate the scattering intensity, this time using newly 
generated .xtc file *only* containing the solute and the new .tpr file *only* 
containing the solute as follows:
g_rdf_4mpi -s topol_polymer_only.tpr -f traj_polymer_only.xtc -noxvgr  -sq 
sq_polymer_only1 


I get much higher scattering intensity compared to the earlier case ( where  
trajectory of the entire solution was used and a index file was provided to 
consider the solute only for calculation purpose), however the peak position is 
same for both cases. I think, possibly, there might be a bug which does the 
normalization for the entire solution in stead of the subset of the system if 
asked to. 
Any help in clarifying it will be helpful.


Sanku
-- 
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to