"Kenneth E. Lussier" wrote:
> David L. Roberts wrote:
>
> > They took a look at me too:
> > Jul 3 19:43:32 ria in.ftpd[2785]: connect from 24.112.52.123
> >
> > But this is the ftp daemon right...? I guess I could shut ftp
> > off as well - I just find it useful to transfer "homework"
> > bet
Someone finally posted the "Know your Enemy" series to /. today.
I figured that I would pass it on to anyone who is interested.
It's a series of papers about the activites of script kiddies and
crackers complete with log files, keystroke captures, etc. It
walks you through attacks and describes wh
Derek Martin wrote:
>
> On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Benjamin Scott wrote:
>
> > > Man pages are much clearer ...
> >
> > LOL. I've read some pretty bad manpages in my time. And I ain't that
> > old. :-)
>
> O.k., let me precisely restate that which I thought was obvious, being:
> "In my opinion, N
David L. Roberts wrote:
> They took a look at me too:
> Jul 3 19:43:32 ria in.ftpd[2785]: connect from 24.112.52.123
>
> But this is the ftp daemon right...? I guess I could shut ftp
> off as well - I just find it useful to transfer "homework"
> between my employer and home. I thought I had
On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Mike Stephan wrote:
> Are there any meetings planned for the Central GNHLUG group (I live in
> Boscawen)?
We ("we" being rather loosely defined) try to keep the LUG calendar
up-to-date with all the latest events. Although it seems to be rather blank
as of late. (Hint, hint
"David L. Roberts" wrote:
>
> Ray Bowles wrote:
> >
>
> But this is the ftp daemon right...? I guess I could shut ftp
> off as well - I just find it useful to transfer "homework"
> between my employer and home. I thought I had things set fairly
> tight, but maybe I should set 'em tighter. Als
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Karl J. Runge wrote:
> But let's be practical here. It's about the continuum of risk management
> rather than absolute "NSA level" security.
Of course. I've said it before myself, all security decisions need to be
evaluated in terms of risk/benefit analysis. I mainly wante
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Benjamin Scott wrote:
> > Man pages are much clearer ...
>
> LOL. I've read some pretty bad manpages in my time. And I ain't that
> old. :-)
O.k., let me precisely restate that which I thought was obvious, being:
"In my opinion, Non-GNU, Non-Solaris pre-2.7 man pages ar
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Benjamin Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While certainly better then simple, cleartext telnet, please imagine the
> following scenario: An attacker manages to compromise the link between you
> and the host you are trying to SSH to. This is, after all, why you want SSH
>
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Derek Martin wrote:
> Which is great, except for the oft overlooked idea that TEXINFO SUCKS.
IMO, it isn't so much texinfo (which is just an encoding format, after all)
but the "info" viewer/browser program that really sucks.
> Either that or the author of every texinfo man
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Adam Wendt wrote:
> Right now I only have a 85meg hard drive so I was hoping you guys could
> give me some suggestions on what distro/OS (FreeBSD, NetBSD OpenBSD etc..)
> might work for this purpose (and fit on 85megs).
I would recommend either Linux or OpenBSD.
Linux has
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Karl J. Runge wrote:
> Mindterm is a Java applet implementation of a SSH client. So if the ssh
> host is also serving web pages, you just plunk down the mindterm in
> some (possibly obscure) place in the web directories. Then you just
> have to type in a URL in any java enabled
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Benjamin Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hmmm. AFAIK, simply having telnet open isn't insecure. It is using telnet
> -- specifically, logging in with your password in the clear -- that makes you
> vulnerable to sniffed passwords. SSH will help prevent that.
>
> H
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Brice Gibson wrote:
> I am looking at Rocket Modem II and DIGI Accele Port multimodem
> cards. Does anyone have opinions about what is the best multi modem card
> for LINUX??
I don't have much personal experience in this area, so take this with
several cups of salt, but..
On Thu, 06 Jul 2000, "David L. Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> And yes, I know I should have a dedicated firewall, yada yada
> yada, but I don't have the $$$ for the rest of the hardware to
> build the system so I'm sitting here playing a little Russian
> Roulette - hoping my Bastille i
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Jeffry Smith wrote:
> Convert to ssh and shut down telnet. As long as you have telnet open,
> you're vulnerable.
Hmmm. AFAIK, simply having telnet open isn't insecure. It is using telnet
-- specifically, logging in with your password in the clear -- that makes you
vulnerab
Ray Bowles wrote:
>
> I too have had some sort of connection:
> Jul 3 19:56:47 localhost in.ftpd[16221]: connect from 24.112.52.123
> Name:cr444296-c.lndn1.on.wave.home.com
> Address: 24.112.52.123
>
> What else can I do to track this person down? I need telnet open on my
> system for admi
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Ray Bowles wrote:
> Jul 3 19:56:47 localhost in.ftpd[16221]: connect from 24.112.52.123
> Name:cr444296-c.lndn1.on.wave.home.com
> Address: 24.112.52.123
>
> What else can I do to track this person down? I need telnet open on my
> system for administration reasons. They
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, "Ray Bowles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I too have had some sort of connection:
> Jul 3 19:56:47 localhost in.ftpd[16221]: connect from 24.112.52.123
> Name:cr444296-c.lndn1.on.wave.home.com
> Address: 24.112.52.123
>
> What else can I do to track this person down? I
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Ray Bowles wrote:
> What else can I do to track this person down? I need telnet open on my
> system for administration reasons. They are running Caldera OpenLinux and
> Apache. They too are running telnet
No you don't Ray. Get OpenSSH.
ftp://ftp.franken.de/pub/Linux/files
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Bruce McCulley wrote:
>
> If you really want to understand tar, then you should run info and read
> the
> tar info pages, or use the info mode in emacs.
Which is great, except for the oft overlooked idea that TEXINFO SUCKS.
Nice idea and all, but it's just NO
I too have had some sort of connection:
Jul 3 19:56:47 localhost in.ftpd[16221]: connect from 24.112.52.123
Name:cr444296-c.lndn1.on.wave.home.com
Address: 24.112.52.123
What else can I do to track this person down? I need telnet open on my
system for administration reasons. They are runnin
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Jeffry Smith wrote:
> As many things as I like & admire about the FSF, their insistance on info
> rather than man bugs me. I find man much easier to use than info.
Ditto. And now that HTML has taken over the world, info(1) is more-or-less
completely obsolete. (The texinfo
In a message dated: Thu, 06 Jul 2000 16:26:56 EDT
Adam Wendt said:
>Try:
> my @salt = qw(a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u
> v w x y z A B C D E F J H I J K L M N O P
> Q R S T U V W X Y Z 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 . /);
> my $len = $#sal
Seriously, the PERL motto applies: "There's more than one way to
do it!"
That's the beauty of OpenSource, you're free to re-invent the wheel
ad nauseum.
I particularly loved this gem in a man page on Corel (Debian) Linux,
it suggests some of the other ways to accomplish the desired RTFM results:
In a message dated: Thu, 06 Jul 2000 15:19:40 CDT
Thomas Charron said:
>Quoting Paul Lussier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Actually, I am using the Crypt-PasswdMD5-1.0 module which is dependant upon
>> the Digest::MD5 module. I'm just not sure how I'd go about creating a
>> password. Would this suf
People,
The Central Linux meeting on firewalls, will be held at the
Centennial Inn, 96 Pleasant St., Concord, NH. This is a
change in the location, not the subject.
This should be a discussion of:
I want to do this. Does a Linux firewall do this easily?
If I want to do these things, what hardwa
Paul Lussier wrote:
> ... I always have an xterm open, 'man ' used
> to do wonders for those who knew how and wanted to RTFM. Unfortunately,
> there's no longer and FM to R! Now what am I supposed to tell people who ask
> stupid questions? ;)
> --
> Seeya,
> Paul
>
Isn't that what the
For the reasonably bored, I just figured out how the MD5 enabled crypt
function in unix works, and holy ugly.
Basically, it takes a password and a salt. It then starts a 1000 iteration
loop. It then hashes the result of the hash iterativly, using the sale every
3rd time, the original pas
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Paul Lussier wrote:
> In a message dated: Thu, 06 Jul 2000 14:46:24 EDT
> Derek Martin said:
>
> >It isn't just redhat though, there's a lack of manpages for a lot of stuff
> >that people are doing now.
>
> Can you say Gnome, or KDE? There isn't a single man page for either
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Paul Lussier wrote:
>
> In a message dated: Thu, 06 Jul 2000 14:27:19 CDT
> Thomas Charron said:
>
> > Actually, scratch that, I was on crack. After looking, we're using SHA1
> >digests, *NOT* MD5. Ryan, crack me in the head later..
> >
> > In our case, we're using Dige
On Thu, 06 Jul 2000, Paul Lussier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Actually, I am using the Crypt-PasswdMD5-1.0 module which is dependant upon
> the Digest::MD5 module. I'm just not sure how I'd go about creating a
> password. Would this suffice:
>
> #!/usr/bin/perl
>
> my ($pa
Quoting Paul Lussier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Actually, I am using the Crypt-PasswdMD5-1.0 module which is dependant upon
> the Digest::MD5 module. I'm just not sure how I'd go about creating a
> password. Would this suffice:
> #!/usr/bin/perl
>
> my ($password) = shift;
> my
In a message dated: Thu, 06 Jul 2000 15:50:20 EDT
Derek Martin said:
>Really all I'm looking for is a short, 5 line man page that tells me what
>all the programs do, *INCLUDING* all the programs that you wouldn't
>normally call directly. I just want to know what they do...
That's one of my big
In a message dated: Thu, 06 Jul 2000 14:27:19 CDT
Thomas Charron said:
> Actually, scratch that, I was on crack. After looking, we're using SHA1
>digests, *NOT* MD5. Ryan, crack me in the head later..
>
> In our case, we're using Digests, which I suspect is a little different from
>
>what
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Paul Lussier wrote:
> >It isn't just redhat though, there's a lack of manpages for a lot of stuff
> >that people are doing now.
>
> Can you say Gnome, or KDE? There isn't a single man page for either of those,
> nor for any of the apps that come with them. (Well, not entire
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Jeffry Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Adam Wendt wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Benjamin Scott wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Adam Wendt wrote:
> > > > On a side note, I have some RAM and I'm not sure what type it is. Its
> > > > smaller than SIMM and it fits in
In a message dated: Thu, 06 Jul 2000 14:46:24 EDT
Derek Martin said:
>It isn't just redhat though, there's a lack of manpages for a lot of stuff
>that people are doing now.
Can you say Gnome, or KDE? There isn't a single man page for either of those,
nor for any of the apps that come with them
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Adam Wendt wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Benjamin Scott wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Adam Wendt wrote:
> > > On a side note, I have some RAM and I'm not sure what type it is. Its
> > > smaller than SIMM and it fits in my socket 3 mobo, anyone want to take a
> > > guess at
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Niall Kavanagh wrote:
>
> > > Is it the same for MD5?
> >
> > 12 characters.
>
> Where did you come across this bit of trivia? Or perhaps the question
> really is "where do we find more information about md5?"
>
Dunno for sure. I
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Niall Kavanagh wrote:
> > Is it the same for MD5?
>
> 12 characters.
Where did you come across this bit of trivia? Or perhaps the question
really is "where do we find more information about md5?"
>
> > "I always explain our company via interpretive dance.
> >
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Karl J. Runge wrote:
> > their manpages were woefully incomplete.
>
> It has gotten a lot better in the 3 years since 2.6 came out. As far
> as raw counts of man pages go, about 4600 for RH 6.2 and about 9600 for
> Solaris 8. (please no flames; I understand this isn't the fu
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Benjamin Scott wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Adam Wendt wrote:
> > On a side note, I have some RAM and I'm not sure what type it is. Its
> > smaller than SIMM and it fits in my socket 3 mobo, anyone want to take a
> > guess at what type of RAM it is and/or what sizes it might b
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Adam Wendt wrote:
> On a side note, I have some RAM and I'm not sure what type it is. Its
> smaller than SIMM and it fits in my socket 3 mobo, anyone want to take a
> guess at what type of RAM it is and/or what sizes it might be?
>
> = Adam =
>
How many chips on the board,
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Adam Wendt wrote:
> On a side note, I have some RAM and I'm not sure what type it is. Its
> smaller than SIMM and it fits in my socket 3 mobo, anyone want to take a
> guess at what type of RAM it is and/or what sizes it might be?
Does it look like a 72-pin SIMM, just smaller
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Jeffry Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Adam Wendt wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Chad R. Henry wrote:
> >
> > > On 6 Jul 2000, at 12:58, Adam Wendt wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm putting together a box to be my firewall/gateway to the
> > > > internet. Right now I only have
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Adam Wendt wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Chad R. Henry wrote:
>
> > On 6 Jul 2000, at 12:58, Adam Wendt wrote:
> >
> > > I'm putting together a box to be my firewall/gateway to the
> > > internet. Right now I only have a 85meg hard drive so I was hoping you
> > > guys could g
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Chad R. Henry wrote:
> On 6 Jul 2000, at 12:58, Adam Wendt wrote:
>
> > I'm putting together a box to be my firewall/gateway to the
> > internet. Right now I only have a 85meg hard drive so I was hoping you
> > guys could give me some suggestions on what distro/OS (FreeBSD, N
On 6 Jul 2000, at 12:58, Adam Wendt wrote:
> I'm putting together a box to be my firewall/gateway to the
> internet. Right now I only have a 85meg hard drive so I was hoping you
> guys could give me some suggestions on what distro/OS (FreeBSD, NetBSD
> OpenBSD etc..) might work for this purpose (
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Paul Lussier wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Anyone know anything about MD5 hashes? I need to be able to encrypt passwords
> from within a perl script, and I've grabbed the MD5 mods off of CPAN.
>
> However, the PasswdMD5.pm mod docs leave a lot to be desired. Specifically,
> th
I'm putting together a box to be my firewall/gateway to the
internet. Right now I only have a 85meg hard drive so I was hoping you
guys could give me some suggestions on what distro/OS (FreeBSD, NetBSD
OpenBSD etc..) might work for this purpose (and fit on 85megs). I'm on a
dialup so I'll need PPP
Thanks for all the responses - one of the great things about the Open
Source world is all the resources. I'd come across the package while
looking for something else, and now there's a bunch of other stuff to
look at.
jeff
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Thomas Charron wrote:
>
> Quoting Jeffry Smith <[
Hi all,
Anyone know anything about MD5 hashes? I need to be able to encrypt passwords
from within a perl script, and I've grabbed the MD5 mods off of CPAN.
However, the PasswdMD5.pm mod docs leave a lot to be desired. Specifically,
the mention invoving the function as:
$cryptedpass
Quoting Jeffry Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This is a followup to Cole's presentation of a 3D modeling sw at the
> May SLUG meeting. I just found Geomview, which has restarted
> development, apparently (thanks to the power of GPL when the original
> developers abandoned it):
> http://www.geomview
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Cole Tuininga wrote:
> Jeffry Smith wrote:
> >
> > This is a followup to Cole's presentation of a 3D modeling sw at the
> > May SLUG meeting. I just found Geomview, which has restarted
> > development, apparently (thanks to the power of GPL when the original
> > developers a
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Derek Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yesterday, Karl J. Runge gleaned this insight:
> Linuxdoc.org on the CD and/or installed in /usr/doc. I've seen the
> documentation that Sun ships, and it sucks. Until at least Solaris 2.6
> their manpages were woefully incomplete.
Jeffry Smith wrote:
>
> This is a followup to Cole's presentation of a 3D modeling sw at the
> May SLUG meeting. I just found Geomview, which has restarted
> development, apparently (thanks to the power of GPL when the original
> developers abandoned it):
> http://www.geomview.org/
>
> I'm stil
In a message dated: Thu, 06 Jul 2000 10:55:35 EDT
Brice Gibson said:
>I am looking at Rocket Modem II and DIGI Accele Port multimodem
>cards. Does anyone have opinions about what is the best multi modem card
>for LINUX??
See Morton Bay RASTel. They have 2, 4 , and 8 modem PCI cards:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On Wed, 05 Jul 2000, Paul Lussier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Support:
> >
> > Linux has the most comprehensive documentation of any operating system
> > available, commercial or free. The documentation is available on-line,
> > and with each Li
I am looking at Rocket Modem II and DIGI Accele Port multimodem
cards. Does anyone have opinions about what is the best multi modem card
for LINUX??
thanks
Brice Gibson
IS Director
Foto Fantasy Inc.
8 Commercial Street
Hudson, NH 03051
603-324-3240 X 121
www.fantasyent.com
www.stickerstat
This is a followup to Cole's presentation of a 3D modeling sw at the
May SLUG meeting. I just found Geomview, which has restarted
development, apparently (thanks to the power of GPL when the original
developers abandoned it):
http://www.geomview.org/
I'm still working on getting it to actually w
>> Scalability
>> ---
>...
>
>> As far as multi-cpu scalability, Linux currently supports upto 16 CPUs in a
>> single system. MS claims that they support upto 32, but since they only run
>> on Intel hardware, and there currently is no Intel-based system with more
>> than 8 CPUs in it, thi
In a message dated: Wed, 05 Jul 2000 21:37:26 PDT
"Karl J. Runge" said:
>> Support:
>>
>...
>> Linux has the most comprehensive documentation of any operating system
>> available, commercial or free. The documentation is available on-line, and
>> with each Linux distribution.
>
>So yo
Yesterday, Karl J. Runge gleaned this insight:
> > Linux has the most comprehensive documentation of any operating system
> > available, commercial or free. The documentation is available on-line, and
> > with each Linux distribution.
>
> So you are including the web-lookup aspect when you say
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, dsbelile wrote:
>was there a login statement? like su root or su -l root? if not
>then i would not worry to much but it does look like someone tried to
>telnet in and got denied by what you
>displayed.
No evidence of a login. I may have gotten lucky.
Kenneth E. Lussier w
In a message dated: Wed, 05 Jul 2000 19:11:55 EDT
John Abreau said:
>We're trying to set up a Veritas backup system, and it's been suggested
>that we add an additional network card to each host to create an extra LAN
>for the backups. I'm concerned because this will bypass out firewall.
>However
On Thu, 6 Jul 2000, Jeffry Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
>
> This isn't totally a linux problem, but the distributions need to pay
> more for people to write documentation. Of course, the redone
> linuxdoc.org and Open Writers project are helping.
I agree, and it is getting better all
To add to Paul's list, I add the maintenance flexibility. The below
is from the sample document I had at the LBS:
1.1 Maintenance Options
One of the best benefits of the Open Source model is the ability to
choose your source of maintenance. Some people have argued that the
lack of a single ent
Charles Farinella wrote:
>
> I found the following in my logs, and while I'm not sure exactly what they
> mean, I find them somewhat disconcerting. Maybe someone can provide a
> clue for the clueless.
>
> >From /var/log/secure:
> Jun 12 15:18:55 farinella in.telnetd[1817]: connect from 64.228.1
Charles Farinella wrote:
>
> I found the following in my logs, and while I'm not sure exactly what they
> mean, I find them somewhat disconcerting. Maybe someone can provide a
> clue for the clueless.
>
> >From /var/log/secure:
> Jun 12 15:18:55 farinella in.telnetd[1817]: connect from 64.228.1
OK, digging into it, some more aspects in favor of linux:
1999 Infoworld Product of the Year: OS's: Red Hat 6.1
http://www.infoworld.com/supplements/99poy_win/99poy_os.html
Unfortunately, I couldn't bring up their pages (probably because of
the redesign they did a year ago against the advice of
I found the following in my logs, and while I'm not sure exactly what they
mean, I find them somewhat disconcerting. Maybe someone can provide a
clue for the clueless.
>From /var/log/secure:
Jun 12 15:18:55 farinella in.telnetd[1817]: connect from 64.228.199.113
and from /var/log/messages:
Jun 1
72 matches
Mail list logo