Emacs and ange-ftp with ssh?

2000-07-17 Thread Paul Lussier
Hi all, One of my favorite features of emacs was angeftp. Unfortunately, by shutting off ftp and going all ssh, ange-ftp is essentially useless. Is there anything similar for ssh, or is there a way to make ange-ftp work with ssh/scp rather than ftp? Thanks, -- Seeya, Paul "I

Re: IPChains Firewall and Failover

2000-07-17 Thread Benjamin Scott
On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, Derek Martin wrote: > Sure, but it hardly matters, since if this is a firewall and your tcp/ip > stack has gone south, then you're still dead, because you won't be routing > packets! For that matter, if your TCP/IP stack has gone south, odds are the rest of the kernel proba

Re: IPChains Firewall and Failover

2000-07-17 Thread Derek Martin
On Mon, 17 Jul 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In a situation where there was issue, bug, exploit, in the tcp/ip stack > which caused ip communication to go dead then serial line communication > may also be affected, because the Heartbeat Package uses an UDP > Heartbeat over ppp when a serial con

Re: Paranoia (was: CPU comparisons)

2000-07-17 Thread Bob Bell
On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 01:44:39PM -0400, Derek Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, mike ledoux wrote: > > You're worried about privacy and security, yet you would run a Java > > applet from an untrusted source? > > No silly! I wouldn't, but that's not the point. Althou

To meet in August or not?

2000-07-17 Thread Paul Lussier
Hi all, We're currently debating whether or not to have an August meeting. The "scheduled" date is August 17, though several people (possibly myself included) are likely to be at LinuxWorld that week. We could put it off a week until August 24. But are people going to be here for it? Do w

Re: IPChains Firewall and Failover

2000-07-17 Thread jflythe
In a situation where there was issue, bug, exploit, in the tcp/ip stack which caused ip communication to go dead then serial line communication may also be affected, because the Heartbeat Package uses an UDP Heartbeat over ppp when a serial connection is used. I don't really know if this is the ca

Re: Email on Linux

2000-07-17 Thread Karl J. Runge
On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, Paul Lussier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Glimpse works great with exmh as well. Unfortunately the license has changed > and it is no longer free, even for non-commercial use. You must therefore > find an old copy of it somewhere and use that. I haven't tried it yet

Re: IPChains Firewall and Failover

2000-07-17 Thread Derek Martin
On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, Paul Lussier wrote: > > In a message dated: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 01:27:31 EDT > Derek Martin said: > > >What makes you think this? Heartbeat specifically states that heartbeat > >ethernets should be *dedicated* (as does our documentation, I believe) > >which should prevent tha

Re: Paranoia (was: CPU comparisons)

2000-07-17 Thread Derek Martin
On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, mike ledoux wrote: > On Sun, 16 Jul 2000, Derek Martin wrote: > > >> The whole Pentium CPU Serial Number thing was blown out of proportion in all > >> the wrong directions. A unique, per-chip ID adds nothing -- in terms of being > >> able to track individual workstations

Re: Email on Linux

2000-07-17 Thread Paul Lussier
In a message dated: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 07:24:43 PDT "Karl J. Runge" said: >I want to thank you for the description of mh & exmh. You've mentioned >exmh several times in the past and that prompted me to look into it a >bit then. My impression is it looks like mh & exmh is a really good >system. Yo

Re: Any one else getting Paul's mail late?

2000-07-17 Thread Paul Lussier
In a message dated: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 09:21:11 EDT Kenny Donahue said: >It looks like it got sent on Tuesday and I just got >it this morning. Paul is this a local date issue >on yourn side? No, it was a local semdmail issue. The mail queued on my home system because of mis-config in the send

Re: IPChains Firewall and Failover

2000-07-17 Thread Paul Lussier
In a message dated: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 01:27:31 EDT Derek Martin said: >It's just not an issue, in the case of a firewall machine. Using shared >SCSI only makes sense if you have shared data. Kimberlite is a great, >reletively inexpensive HA solution, but it's overkill for a redundant >firewall.

Re: IPChains Firewall and Failover

2000-07-17 Thread Paul Lussier
In a message dated: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 01:27:31 EDT Derek Martin said: >What makes you think this? Heartbeat specifically states that heartbeat >ethernets should be *dedicated* (as does our documentation, I believe) >which should prevent that scenario, so if you failed miserably to follow >direct

Re: Presentation Problems.

2000-07-17 Thread Paul Lussier
In a message dated: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 22:56:09 EDT Benjamin Scott said: > Hrm. From a purely pragmatic stance, I see your point. However, I cannot >forget that it wasn't long ago at all that Linux was excluded from that list >of "major platforms". I disliked closed formats like Flash before,

Re: Host IDs (was: PIII CPU id)

2000-07-17 Thread Bob Bell
On Sun, Jul 16, 2000 at 01:31:49PM -0400, James R. Van Zandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Benjamin Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >On Fri, 14 Jul 2000, Karl J. Runge wrote: > >> Maybe it is all faked on Intel, but on other arches (e.g sparc, alpha) > >> perhaps it is something on the boar

Re: Presentation Problems.

2000-07-17 Thread Paul Lussier
In a message dated: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 11:30:20 EDT Benjamin Scott said: >On Fri, 14 Jul 2000, Paul Lussier wrote: >> Better yet, don't use application proprietary data transfer formats :) >> >> Use ... MacroMedia Flash and your presentation will be "viewable" from no >> matter what platform you'

Re: IPChains Firewall and Failover

2000-07-17 Thread Derek Martin
On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, Derek Martin wrote: > > What makes you think this? Heartbeat specifically states that heartbeat > ethernets should be *dedicated* (as does our documentation, I believe) > which should prevent that scenario, so if you failed miserably to follow > directions and not do that,

Re: IPChains Firewall and Failover

2000-07-17 Thread Paul Lussier
In a message dated: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 18:45:09 EDT Derek Martin said: >But, last I'd been paying attention, heartbeat does allow heartbeat over >serial and ethernet simultaneously, and Alan (Robertson) was thinking >about adding other methods. It's true that shared SCSI is not supported >by hear

Re: Email on Linux

2000-07-17 Thread Karl J. Runge
On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, Paul Lussier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Paul, > [mh/exmh description] I want to thank you for the description of mh & exmh. You've mentioned exmh several times in the past and that prompted me to look into it a bit then. My impression is it looks like mh & exmh is a real

Re: IPChains Firewall and Failover

2000-07-17 Thread Derek Martin
On Sun, 16 Jul 2000, Paul Lussier wrote: > > In a message dated: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 18:45:09 EDT > Derek Martin said: > > >But, last I'd been paying attention, heartbeat does allow heartbeat over > >serial and ethernet simultaneously, and Alan (Robertson) was thinking > >about adding other method

Any one else getting Paul's mail late?

2000-07-17 Thread Kenny Donahue
It looks like it got sent on Tuesday and I just got it this morning. Paul is this a local date issue on yourn side? Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from hugin.mc.com by mc.com (8.8.8+Sun/SMI-SVR4) id JAA16988;

Re: OSF

2000-07-17 Thread Benjamin Scott
On Sun, 16 Jul 2000, Tom Rauschenbach wrote: > Interesting; my netscape gets a bus error when trying to view > www.opengroup.org which usually only happens with "this page best viewed > with ..." pages. Try starting Netscape with the "-install" switch ("netscape -install"), which forces it to i

Re: OSF

2000-07-17 Thread Jerry Feldman
I just brought the OpenGroup web page up on Netscape 4.73 (128 bit version) which I had downloaded from the Netscape site. I have not had any problems with this browser. I added flash from shockwave. Tom Rauschenbach wrote: > On Sun, 16 Jul 2000, you wrote: > > >The Open >Source Foundation does

Re: IPChains Firewall and Failover (fwd)

2000-07-17 Thread Derek Martin
On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, Derek Martin wrote: > What makes you think this? Heartbeat specifically states that heartbeat > ethernets should be *dedicated* (as does our documentation, I believe) > which should prevent that scenario, so if you failed miserably to follow > directions and not do that, yo

Re: IPChains Firewall and Failover (fwd)

2000-07-17 Thread Derek Martin
> In a message dated: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 18:45:09 EDT > Derek Martin said: > > >But, last I'd been paying attention, heartbeat does allow heartbeat over > >serial and ethernet simultaneously, and Alan (Robertson) was thinking > >about adding other methods. It's true that shared SCSI is not suppo