In a message dated: Sat, 25 Nov 2000 22:00:08 EST
Greg Kettmann said:
So, do I have the process right? What is a (good) package for burning
CD's under Linux?
I like cdrecord. For proper usage, as always, check out
http://www.linuxdocs.org for the CD-Writing HOWTO, he's got step-by-step
What is a (good) package for burning CD's under Linux?
cdrecord is a decent command-line based package and has more options
than you can shake a stick at.
For something a bit friendlier, there's a package called XCDRoast which
functions as a GUI frontend and makes the process a simple
Paul Lussier wrote:
I like cdrecord. For proper usage, as always, check out
http://www.linuxdocs.org for the CD-Writing HOWTO, he's got step-by-step
procdures in there for you!
To add to this, if you are looking for a GUI front-end to use, there is
Xcdroast, CD-Toaster, KreateCD, and several
To expound upon my earlier answer, since I am more awake now (had my 2nd
and 3rd cup of coffee), here is the original answer with a bit more
detail:
I'm not sure what you are asking. If you just want to be able to connect
to the firewall box and log into it directly, use OpenSSH. Anything else
I sent this out yesterday morning, but it never made it to the list, so
I'll try again.
Kenny
"Kenneth E. Lussier" wrote:
All,
I have an IDE cd-rw, but I can no longer get it to work. I have the
ide-scsi modules loaded, but cdrecord refuses to see it. It will see my
regular cdrom drive,
Please reply to him and/or the list.
Kenny
Constantine 'Gus' Fantanas wrote:
Hi,
Sorry to bother you in person. I've been trying to post the attached
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but I've had no success. I have subscribed to
the mailing list.
CF
http://www.instinct.org/~pgl/os-comparison-links.html
http://www.linuxrx.com/WS_Linux/OS_comparison.html -pick your own OS's
http://www.arches.uga.edu/~jowaters/5640/noscomp.html
And of course, a google search on "Operating System Comparison"
reference:
In a message dated: Sun, 26 Nov 2000 13:12:17 EST
"Kenneth E. Lussier" said:
http://www.instinct.org/~pgl/os-comparison-links.html
http://www.linuxrx.com/WS_Linux/OS_comparison.html -pick your own OS's
http://www.arches.uga.edu/~jowaters/5640/noscomp.html
Thanks, these above look interesting,
So, Ryan is a Civillation II junkie, and can't totally port to linux till it
works there. Win4Lin was not doing what we wanted, and we know that civ2 can
run in wine, so I installed wine for him. Wine is working fine for other apps
but not for civ2. The HowTos, man pages and irc channel have
What error is cdrecord producing (and what command line are you using)?
I have an IDE cd-rw, but I can no longer get it to work. I have the
ide-scsi modules loaded, but cdrecord refuses to see it.
**
To unsubscribe from this list, send
Well, the command line that I used to use was:
cdrecord -v speed=2 dev=0,1,0 -data filename.iso.
If I try this now, I get a "no such device 0,1,0". This, of course, is
because cdrecord doesn't find the CDRW drive when it scans the bus, even
though it is listed in /proc/scsi/scsi. When I
Have you told the IDE driver to ignore the drive? If so, conf.modules
should
have something like:
options ide-cd ignore=hda
If not, note that you'll have to reload your ide module (or reboot)
before this
will take affect.
--Bruce
PS: Do you have the SCSI Generic option set in your your
In a message dated: Sun, 26 Nov 2000 14:59:16 EST
Greg Kettmann said:
I'm attaching a short paper. I don't remember where I got it. Also, one of
my favorite sites is www.osopinion.com. Searching there will probably yield
something. Great question, BTW. Some of the responses are good and
On Sun, 26 Nov 2000, Kurth Bemis wrote:
I've been having problems with licq latley. i cant connect to the
server. i can ping itbut can't connect...
Works for me. LICQ 0.85 (11 July 2000).
--
Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Net Technologies, Inc. http://www.ntisys.com
Voice:
On Thu, 23 Nov 2000, Karl J. Runge wrote:
If one is handy with working from a linux boot floppy, another option is
to create a subdir on the Windoze C: drive (e.g. C:\LNX_BOOT) and copy the
necessary boot files down there (kernel, lilo boot.* files, etc). Then
modify lilo.conf to point at
On Sun, 26 Nov 2000, Kenneth E. Lussier wrote:
FreeS/WAN's strengths are that it 1) can use large keys 2) can use RSA
authentication 3) is a stable IPSEC implimentation 4) Isn't all that hard
to set up (*IF* you RTFM a few times ;-) ).
I have heard some rumbling that FreeS/WAN, while very
On Sat, 25 Nov 2000, Ferenc Tamas Gyurcsan wrote:
Does anybody know where I could find information about connecting to a
windows firewall? I know, this could be a little more detailed
description, but I don't know much else about it.
Unfortunately, without more detailed information, we
On Sat, 25 Nov 2000, Greg Kettmann wrote:
It's mandatory that I pass through Windows, due to a VPN program issue.
When I copy the files over to Winblows it loses the symbolic links.
Yes. Windows does not support the concept of a filesystem symlink at all,
and of course Unix permissions do
Paul,
I was wondering if you could share the results with us when it is
completed.
Paul Lussier wrote:
I'm attaching a short paper. I don't remember where I got it. Also, one of
my favorite sites is www.osopinion.com. Searching there will probably yield
something. Great question, BTW.
On Sun, Nov 26, Constantine 'Gus' Fantanas wrote:
First of all, ump.so IS there but Netscape gives me an error message about
a missing plugin whenever I site includes a MIDI file.
Open the URL "about:plugins" in Netscape and see if UMP is listed.
Second, I downloaded a MIDI file from the
In a message dated: Sun, 26 Nov 2000 17:20:04 EST
Jerry Feldman said:
Paul,
I was wondering if you could share the results with us when it is completed.
Er, share results of what? Websites ? Or the paper?
I don't really know all the details of what she's doing/researching, I was
just asking
Hello,
I am relatively new to Linux. I am running SuSE 7.0 Personal on a
dual-boot system (my other OS is Win98SE). I would like to depend on
Windows as little as possible.
One problem I am facing is playing MIDI files. First of all, I threw
out SuSE's Netscape and installed 4.75. I
I'm trying to build a package called firestarter which let's you configure a
firewall. The build is failing, not finding status-docklet.h. Does
anyone know what package contains this file ?
TIA
TomR
-- Standard is better than
better. If your web page cares what browser I'm using it's
Benjamin Scott wrote:
[SNIP]
I have heard some rumbling that FreeS/WAN, while very promising, is not
quite ready for prime time, even in security critical areas. Anyone have any
comments on this? I have not played with FreeS/WAN yet, myself, and the
rumbling I have heard was just in
Ken Ambrose wrote:
While we're on this topic... I'm tyring to get PoPToP running on my work
machine, and failing (maybe). I guess the real problem is client-side --
the documentation on how to set up the pptp client is sparse at best (the
entire "USING" file is 19 lines long, and
Ummmwhere did you get the info that Civ2 ran under Wine? I'm a civ2
junkie myself and have never had it running under wine.
--rdp
On Sun, 26 Nov 2000, mjo wrote:
So, Ryan is a Civillation II junkie, and can't totally port to linux till it
works there. Win4Lin was not doing what we
So, Ryan is a Civillation II junkie, and can't totally port to linux till it
works there.
Have you/he taken a look at FreeCiv http://www.freeciv.org/?
--
Regards, | "The ultimate result is that some innovations that would
.| truly benefit consumers never occur for the sole
The conclusions of her research. I always like to get some perspectives of
other OSs since I am mostly exposed to various religious attitudes.
Paul Lussier wrote:
Er, share results of what? Websites ? Or the paper?
I don't really know all the details of what she's doing/researching, I was
Benjamin Scott wrote:
Ummm, I believe conventional wisdom says that with modern algorithms, session
encryption keys longer then 100 bits or so is just a waste of resources. In
fact, I just checked, and the FreeS/WAN website makes reference to this.
I don't think that statement is
Hi folks,
I've just successfully installed realplayer on my vaio laptop running
storm/debian/potato... however, when I try to play something I get:
"Cannot open the audio device. Another application may be using it."
Any idea how I can start searching for te problem? I'm stumped...
while i'm
Sorry, I took a look at firestarter. Gui is good but it's not better.
Get pmfirewall, answer the rude questions as good as you can and then make
mods to the resulting script if you need to. It's the bestI've seen so
far.
--
-Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things
On Sun, 26 Nov 2000, "Derek D. Martin" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Benjamin Scott wrote:
Ummm, I believe conventional wisdom says that with modern algorithms, session
encryption keys longer then 100 bits or so is just a waste of resources. In
fact, I just checked, and the FreeS/WAN
Are other audio programs working? Try xmms.
-Mark
"Joshua S. Freeman" wrote:
Hi folks,
I've just successfully installed realplayer on my vaio laptop running
storm/debian/potato... however, when I try to play something I get:
"Cannot open the audio device. Another application may be
"Derek D. Martin" wrote:
But when setting up such a system, you also need to consider what
level of risk is acceptable, and how much you are willing to pay to
keep your data secure. For most circumstances, a key length of 4096
bits is just silly, and you should know that before you go ahead
I believe that this is actually part of Gnome. However, I have to throw
in my $0.02. Read the IPChains docs. Read the man pages and the HOWTO.
Do it yourself. It's the best way, and it is the only way that you will
learn all of the reasons that these tools fall short. Anyway, enough
ranting for
Ben,
E-mails to you have been bouncing since about 5PM. This is the only way
I can think of to let you know.
FYI,
Kenny
We now return you to your regularly scheduled line noise
Mail Delivery Subsystem wrote:
**
** THIS IS A
On Sun, 26 Nov 2000, Kenneth E. Lussier wrote:
I have used FreeS/WAN extensivly.
[...snip...]
Well, that is a pretty fair and informative evaluation. Thanks.
Usually when people talk about it being unstable, it is because it is not
an easy configuration to get your hands around ...
On Sun, 26 Nov 2000, Kenneth E. Lussier wrote:
I won't use anything less than 4096-bit for authentication keys. To some,
that may be considered overkill, but to me it's plain old common sence.
I think Derek's point was that it isn't common sense at all.
A 1024-bit key will take some
On Sun, 26 Nov 2000, Derek D. Martin wrote:
Ummm, I believe conventional wisdom says that with modern algorithms,
session encryption keys longer then 100 bits or so is just a waste of
resources. In fact, I just checked, and the FreeS/WAN website makes
reference to this.
I don't think that
39 matches
Mail list logo
