"Karl J. Runge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>But now it certainly seems like a name resolution problem.
>The ssh process for some reason cannot resolve "vanzandt" to an IP
>address.
...
>Just curious, if on voyager you remove the vanzandt.mv.com line
>and put in:
>
>192.168.0.1foobar
>
>d
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Turning on the debug option of pppd
> is by definition useless.
Have you actually tried this?
Because when I do this, I can see LCP/IPCP/CHAP/PAP/MS-CHAP stuff
going on. It seems pretty straightforward to me.
--kevin
--
Kevin D. Clark (CetaceanNetworks.com!kclark
I have installed two AceNIC (gigabit Enet) PCI cards
in a machine I'm working with and I've cabled them
together by connecting each one's Tx port to the
other's Rx port. The driver seems to be happy with
what it finds and the cards seem to be aware of each
other on the link:
>eth4: Alteon AceN
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Benjamin Scott wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Tom Rauschenbach wrote:
> > I don't think it makes sense to talk about ppp over DHCP. What I want to
> > do is see the negoatiation between my ISP and my machine that assigns my
> > machine its IP address. Since this happens befor
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Tom Rauschenbach wrote:
> I don't think it makes sense to talk about ppp over DHCP. What I want to
> do is see the negoatiation between my ISP and my machine that assigns my
> machine its IP address. Since this happens before interface ppp0 is up,
> my packet sniffer can't s
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Benjamin Scott wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Tom Rauschenbach wrote:
> > I've been unsuccessful using etherreal to capture the initial DHCP
> > negotions on the interface ppp0.
>
> Every PPP link I've ever seen has used LCP (Link Control Protocol) messages
> to set the IP c
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Tod Hagan wrote:
> The hardest part is answering all the questions during the config. If
> you've previously built a kernel in the 2.2 series you can copy your
> .config or saved config file from the older kernel directory to give you a
> base to start from. Don't call it .con
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 03:10:37PM -0500, Joshua S. Freeman wrote:
> I'm anxious to quickly upgrade to the newer kernel. i've just printed
> out the kernel how to, but it doesn't seem to address 2.2 kernels...
>
> can you, or anyone else reading this, direct me somewhere where I can
> begin the
Thanks again for the presentation. Sorry I forgot your name, but I
figured you or someone would let us all know who did the presentation.
jeff
---
Jeffry Smith Technical Sales Consultant Mission Critical Linux
[EMAIL
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 11:23:16AM -0500, Bill Freeman wrote:
> Tod Hagan writes:
> > and I never worry about security holes.
>
> Famous last words
:-)
You're right. It's more accurate to say that with qmail I worry less
about security holes than I did with sendmail. It's because I do wo
"Joshua S. Freeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asked:
>>> can you, or anyone else reading this, direct me somewhere where I can
>>> begin the task of upgrading to 2.2.19?
http://www.linuxhq.com/kernel/v2.4/doc/Changes.html
or /usr/src/linux/Documentation/CHANGES (or thereabouts) in the
2.4 kernel tre
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 01:24:33PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> Linux 2.2.19 was released this week, and is not vulnerable. Also, all of
> the 2.4 series kernels are not vulnerable. For more information about
> this vulnerability, see the following links:
Correction: If you read the exploit
Derek,
my machine was owned a couple of weeks ago...
I'm anxious to quickly upgrade to the newer kernel. i've just printed
out the kernel how to, but it doesn't seem to address 2.2 kernels...
can you, or anyone else reading this, direct me somewhere where I can
begin the task of upgrading to
There is a very serious security vulnerability in all Linux Kernel
versions up to and including Linux 2.2.18. This vulnerability can be
exploited easily and trivially by running readily available exploit code
against any SUID-root executable on the system to allow any local user the
ability to
Tod Hagan writes:
> and I never worry about security holes.
Famous last words
**
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
*body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
unsubscrib
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Jeffry Smith wrote:
>
> Actually, it was a fine presentation on Sendmail, with a few comments from
> me on what I know of Exim (that took all of maybe 2 minutes). Alas, with
> my memory, I've already forgotten the name of the Sendmail presenter, but
> I know he's on th
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 02:36:50PM -0500, Greg Kettmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The other issue is technical. For those that didn't know, MediaOne /
> AT+T Broadband stinks. Actually, and to be honest, it's a love hate
> relationship. The fact is their infrastructure is very weak. In
> pa
Dan Jenkins said:
> Benjamin Scott wrote:
>
> > I move we change the "MTA Wars" to a multi-meeting format. Rather then
> > everybody-at-once (which might not have given everybody sufficient time
> > anyway), how about we do one meeting on one MTA, then another meeting on
> > another MTA, and s
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 01:22:06PM -0500, Joshua Flythe wrote:
> I for one am a big qmail fan.
I've been running qmail at home for over three years. I run some small
mailing lists using ezmlm-idx, the companion mailing list
package. While it's not handling much traffic, I like how qmail works,
an
19 matches
Mail list logo
