On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, mike ledoux wrote:
> Must be 0.9.5, my copy of 0.9.4 doesn't have it.
Yah, "Tabbed Browsing" is new (for Mozilla) in 0.9.5.
http://www.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla0.9.5/#new
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101973
Oh, and contrary to initial reports, the keyc
Take a look at:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/28/22837.html
Ed
*
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the text 'unsubscribe gnhlug' in the message body.
*
Derek D. Martin wrote>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> At some point hitherto, Bayard Coolidge USG hath spake thusly:
> > I, for example, greatly prefer:
> >
> > alias ls='ls -aF'
> > to display various symbols to denote executable, directory, symlink,
> > etc., on my files
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Paul Lussier wrote:
> You know, I think I really liked the net before you were allowed to
> do business on it. I really could do without all the e-commerce
> crap.
I'll second that. Never let business managers design IT (or let sysadmins
run a business, either). At least
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Michael Bovee wrote:
> On a related note, sort of, I discovered that under SuSE 7.1 for PPC,
> that if I type ll
As others have pointed out, that is likely an alias. I know Red Hat does
this in the default '.profile' script they provide. They also alias 'l.' to
do an 'l
Yah, well here's MY favorite ls alias
featuring my favorite ls color setting...
alias l='ls -aCF --color=no'
*
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the text 'unsubscribe gnhlug' in the message bo
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Michael Bovee wrote:
> On a related note, sort of, I discovered that under SuSE 7.1 for PPC,
> that if I type ll
> the output looks the same as if I had typed ls -l, but there is no
> man page for 'el el'?
> Is this common for different groups to add their own shorthands, a
Thanks, everyone, for your input.
Derek mentions colors as well:
alias ls='ls -aF --color=tty'
If you don't like the default colors, you can set LS_COLORS with your
own settings. The easiest way to do that is with the dircolors(1)
command. Neat trick I learned from slackware. :)
Yeah, sinc
Michael Bovee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asked:
>>> Is this common for different groups to add their own shorthands,
>>> and then not include them in the manpages?
You might want to do an 'alias ll' (or a just plain 'alias') from your
shell prompt to see what aliases might have been helpfully created
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, Michael Bovee hath spake thusly:
> Hi folks,
> On a related note, sort of, I discovered that under SuSE 7.1 for PPC,
> that if I type ll
> the output looks the same as if I had typed ls -l, but there is no
> man page for 'e
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 03:52:15PM -0500, Michael Bovee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi folks,
> On a related note, sort of, I discovered that under SuSE 7.1 for PPC,
> that if I type ll
> the output looks the same as if I had typed ls -l, but there is no
> man page for 'el el'?
> Is this comm
Hi folks,
On a related note, sort of, I discovered that under SuSE 7.1 for PPC,
that if I type ll
the output looks the same as if I had typed ls -l, but there is no
man page for 'el el'?
Is this common for different groups to add their own shorthands, and
then not include them in the manpages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Derek D. Martin said:
> The problem with the output of `ls' is that punctuation is ignored
> entirely in collate order
Well, not entirely, but (to clarify) it's used in a way that makes
little sense to me.
- --
Derek Martin
Senior System Administr
In a message dated: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 15:44:46 EST
Bruce Dawson said:
>This has all undergone a dramatic change recently.
>
>us.neustar.biz is the new purveyor of the .us domain. And they don't
>appear to have a whois server up yet!
>
>G.
>
>--Bruce
>PS: It looks like the .us domain is no lon
Sadly, no central whois registry for the .us zone has ever been created.
There are pieces that have whois servers running, but that doesn't really
help if it isn't broadly supported.
- Marc
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Paul Lussier wrote:
>
> In a message dated: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 15:35:48 EST
> Marc Eva
This has all undergone a dramatic change recently.
us.neustar.biz is the new purveyor of the .us domain. And they don't
appear to have a whois server up yet!
G.
--Bruce
PS: It looks like the .us domain is no longer free either.
Paul Lussier wrote:
> I'm drawing a blank on this on, Neal an
In a message dated: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 15:35:48 EST
Marc Evans said:
>One method is :
>
>$ nslookup -ty=soa state.nh.us
Ahhh, soa, now why didn't I think of that :)
Thanks! Though shouldn't there be a way to whois these domains?
--
Seeya,
Paul
God Bless America
One method is :
$ nslookup -ty=soa state.nh.us
state.nh.us
origin = oldman.state.nh.us.
mail addr = jsoller.admin.state.nh.us.
serial = 243140
refresh = 43200
retry = 900
expire = 864000
minimum = 86400
and then make use of the 'mail ad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, Steven W. Orr hath spake thusly:
> I was wondering if anyone knew the difference between C and POSIX as a
> setting for LC_COLLATE. Also, does anyone know where I can find the actual
> collation tables for the various valid s
I'm drawing a blank on this on, Neal and I are trying to track down
the owner of a .us domain.
Anyone remember how to do this? Ben? ;)
--
Seeya,
Paul
God Bless America!
...we don't need to be perfect to be the best around,
and we nev
RH 7.1
I have a directory with with 6 files: a b c .a .b .c
If I say ls -a I expect to see .a .b .c a b c
Instead I get .a a .b b .c c
I tracked it back to LANG=en_US and got back my beloved old sort order by
adding a setting of LC_COLLATE to C.
I was wondering if anyone knew the difference be
http://freespace.virgin.net/andrew.harrison4/
--
Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not |
| necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or |
| organization. All information is provided without warrant
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Paul Lussier wrote:
> ... write a script that did what I wanted. I could still do it, and
> probably will (though the Debian output won't work well), but it's going
> to have an awful lot of if...then clauses in it :)
Ever taken a look at a GNU autoconf "configure" script?
In a message dated: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 16:11:25 PST
"Karl J. Runge" said:
>Hi Paul,
>
>Could you give more detail on what you are trying to do?
>
>It sounds like you are trying to write a program or script that
>is portable across the various distros (or, how dated of me, multiple
>Unixes). That
Actually a time and space machine 8-)
A show that is a lot of fun.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/cult/doctorwho/
Sean
On Wed, 2001-11-14 at 14:22, Benjamin Scott wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Paul Lussier wrote:
> > Errr, what's a Tardis?
>
> TARDIS = Time And Relative Dimensions In Space
>
25 matches
Mail list logo
