On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, Greg Kettmann wrote:
That said, I'm hoping Mono will set it's own open standards, as
mentioned in this post, and deny M$ the embrace and extend capability.
While Miguel does mention that as a possibility, I suspect Microsoft will
ensure their own implementation of .NET is
On Saturday 02 February 2002 01:45 pm, Greg Kettmann wrote:
snip
A second point, against Mono and Wine. It's very difficult to win when
you're always chasing or lagging. That is if you are adhering exactly to
Microsoft then they control things. New somethings, like XP, will come out
which
On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, Michael Costolo wrote:
I've read so many articles on what linux needs in order to dethrone
Microsoft. They all basically say the same thing and it seems that more
and more developers are listening, but I don't know why.
You have to understand something: In the past 100
All of this being said (.net, mono, etc.) , I've always been amazed
that Linux heads aren't rabid supporters of Sun, Java and EJB. It may
not be free, but it is open and above board.
ccb
*
To unsubscribe from this list, send
On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 01:22:23PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All of this being said (.net, mono, etc.) , I've always been amazed
that Linux heads aren't rabid supporters of Sun, Java and EJB. It may
not be free, but it is open and above board.
Ganesh Prasad actually wrote a well
On Sat, 2 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All of this being said (.net, mono, etc.) , I've always been amazed that
Linux heads aren't rabid supporters of Sun, Java and EJB. It may not be
free, but it is open and above board.
I don't know about others, but *this* Linux head doesn't trust
On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, Paul Iadonisi wrote:
His view was that the only real viable competition the free software world
has against .NET was to fully and wholeheartedly embrace J2EE.
Here I will echo Michael Costolo: Who says we need to compete against
.NET? Computers are not a zero-sum game.
On Fri, 2002-02-01 at 23:18, Benjamin Scott wrote:
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Michael O'Donnell wrote:
I haven't done an X installation in quite a while so I wonder,
what's the
state-of-the-art?
Red Hat's current Xconfigurator will detect known video cards, query
the
attached monitor for its
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
it was time to configure X. In fact, that was part of
the reason I chose to leave, since in the past I have
found configuring X to be a giant PITA. I haven't done
an X installation in quite a while so I wonder, what's
the state-of-the-art? Calculating all that
After I wrote:
I can't believe that somebody hasn't
created some tool to ease the pain a bit
...Ed Robbins replied:
Version 4.x of XFree86 does a pretty good job of creating
a XF86Config file. Run the command XFree86 -configure
That will generate a config file which is a great
place
On 2 Feb 2002, Derek wrote:
http://wwwinfo.cern.ch/pdp/ose/linux/lsr/pro/RedHat/instimage/usr/X11R6/share/Xconfigurator/MonitorsDB
sorry this link name is so long...
FYI, that file is present on Red Hat CDs up to 7.0, as:
/RedHat/instimage/usr/X11R6/share/Xconfigurator/MonitorsDB
On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, Michael O'Donnell wrote:
Ed Robbins replied:
Version 4.x of XFree86 does a pretty good job of creating
a XF86Config file. Run the command XFree86 -configure
That will generate a config file which is a great
place to start. I say start only because it would
generate
12 matches
Mail list logo
