Since we can't convince you GPG guyz :-)
.procmailrc:
:0 Bf
* -BEGIN PGP
| pgp_clean
pgp_clean:
#!/bin/sh -- # A comment mentioning perl
eval 'exec perl -S $0 ${1+"$@"}'
if 0;
while (<>) { $msg .= $_ }
$msg =~ s/-BEGIN PGP SIGNED(.|\n)*?Hash:.*\n\n//;
$msg =~ s/-BEGIN P
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Additionally, Pegasus for Windows supports PGP although I have not yet
installed it.
"Kenneth E. Lussier" wrote:
> I would like to add another reason. I have yet to hear of a security
> vulnerability cased
On Fri, 2002-02-22 at 03:56, Derek D. Martin wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> For all of the above reasons, I argue both that PGP signatures do add
> value to a message, and that there is absolutely no comparison between
> a PGP signature and any of the aforementione
