[Fwd: Re: Bizarre network/routing problem]

2001-02-08 Thread Kenneth E. Lussier
Is the PIX a stand-alone or does it have the failover module as well? If it has the failover box, it is possible that when the conduit and static translation were added to the primary, they never did a "wr stand" after the "wr mem". If the primary PIX went down and the failover took it's place, it

Re: BBLISA: Bizarre network/routing problem

2001-02-08 Thread John Abreau
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, John Abreau wrote: > I've got a linux box with a web server that I can't access properly since > this morning. It's at a colocation site, behind a PIX firewall with a > static conduit to it on port 80. [rest of message deleted] The problem turned out to be a bad arp entry in

Re: Bizarre network/routing problem

2001-02-08 Thread Chris Janicki
Did you verify its subnet mask? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< On 2/8/01, 3:30:43 PM, John Abreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote regarding Bizarre network/routin

Bizarre network/routing problem

2001-02-08 Thread John Abreau
I've got a linux box with a web server that I can't access properly since this morning. It's at a colocation site, behind a PIX firewall with a static conduit to it on port 80. I've got two subnets at the site, with several machines on either side. Of the four web servers on the PIX's inside subn