Re: Debian and LSB

2001-02-05 Thread Benjamin Scott
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, Tom Rauschenbach wrote: I'm fantasizing about a distro that comes with a bootable floppy to install from and a set of CDs with tar.gz images of source packages so that you could install a truely generic "GNU/Linux" Well, the biggest problem with the system you describe

Re: Debian and LSB

2001-02-05 Thread Karl J. Runge
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, "Kevin D. Clark" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: pedantic IIRC, MCC and SLS are older. I don't even recall Slackware being available back when I installed Linux. /pedantic I believe there was an implicit "oldest living" floating around in that remark (which I think is

Re: Debian and LSB

2001-02-05 Thread Derek Martin
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Kevin D. Clark wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: While Slackware is certainly no longer the largest distribution, it is certainly the oldest pedantic IIRC, MCC and SLS are older. I don't even recall Slackware being available back when I installed Linux.

Re: Debian and LSB

2001-02-05 Thread Kenneth E. Lussier
Does Yggdrasil count? ;-) Derek Martin wrote: On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Kevin D. Clark wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: While Slackware is certainly no longer the largest distribution, it is certainly the oldest pedantic IIRC, MCC and SLS are older. I don't even recall

Re: Debian and LSB

2001-02-05 Thread Benjamin Scott
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yup, Patrick SomebodyOrOther (Volkerding?) introduced Slackware at least a year after I first installed the SLS distribution from a handful of 5.24" floppies. Wow, you must *real* old. I never had any five-point-two-*four*-inch floppy disks. Did

Re: Debian and LSB

2001-02-04 Thread Ken D'Ambrosio
now trying to get apt-get to load sources so I can re-build a kernel and get what I want. I went to the LSB web page to see what distro I could use that 1) MADE SENSE and 2) wasn't RedHat since RH seems to have adopted MS style marketing strategies. I was surprised to see that Debian is an