On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, mike ledoux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 05:50:01PM -0800, Karl J. Runge wrote:
> > True, but couldn't the user construct a procmail line that would force
> > the issue for the user's mailer?
> >
> > :0 Hfw
> > * ^[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > | formail -I "F
On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Benjamin Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You misunderstand. procmail filters mail as it comes *in* to a system.
> It has nothing to do with the address we *reply* to. That is ultimately
> controlled by the user sending the mail. Myself, I make it a habit to check
> a
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, at 9:19am, Bayard Coolidge USG wrote:
>> Changing your procmail recipe's match line to
>> * ^TOgnhlug@.*zk3.dec.com
>> will solve this problem nicely. :-)
>
> I don't know procmail's configuration semantics, but I would *beg*/*plead*
> that whatever recipe you use, that it p
