Probably not because their Unixes were drek (especially Xenix that they got
from Microsoft). But they did have a large share of the desktop market.
On 18 Mar 2002 at 14:05, Derek D. Martin wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> At 11:42 AM 3/18/2002 -0500, Andrew W. Ga
On Mon, 2002-03-18 at 14:05, Derek D. Martin wrote:
> >>jkinz wrote:
> >>It seems that SUN maybe the first major UNIXen company whose business
> >>will be significantly curtailed by the emergence of Linux.
> >>
> >
> >I thought SCO already grabbed that title.
>
> Did SCO ever count as a major U
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At 11:42 AM 3/18/2002 -0500, Andrew W. Gaunt wrote:
>
>>jkinz wrote:
>>It seems that SUN maybe the first major UNIXen company whose business
>>will be significantly curtailed by the emergence of Linux.
>>
>
>I thought SCO already grabbed that title.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said (as his Humble Opinion):
>>> Of course I never considered SCO to be a "major" UNIXen company
>>> even though they used to ship more licenses than anybody else.
I had the same impression during the timeframe that Compaq bought
out Digital; I was working for Digital at th
At 11:42 AM 3/18/2002 -0500, Andrew W. Gaunt wrote:
>
>>jkinz wrote:
>>It seems that SUN maybe the first major UNIXen company whose business
>>will be significantly curtailed by the emergence of Linux.
>>
>
>I thought SCO already grabbed that title.
>
>-Andy
>
Yes. True. I should say SUN may be
>
>
>It seems that SUN maybe the first major UNIXen company whose business
>will be significantly curtailed by the emergence of Linux.
>
>
I thought SCO already grabbed that title.
-Andy
*
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail
At 11:19 AM 3/18/2002 -0500, Jerry Feldman wrote:
>Actually, I think that Microsoft's claim to Windows is a bit weak since
>they were not the first to use the term to describe GUI, and "windows" is a
>generic term.
>
Darn Tootin'.
Remember using Windows on SUN boxes before any MS Win existed
Actually, I think that Microsoft's claim to Windows is a bit weak since
they were not the first to use the term to describe GUI, and "windows" is a
generic term.
On 18 Mar 2002 at 7:14, Karl J. Runge wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, "Jerry Feldman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That's just a b
On Mon, 2002-03-18 at 09:52, Jerry Feldman wrote:
> That's just a bump on the log. Microsoft will encounter more competition
> and may lose some market share to Linux and BSD, but I don't think that
> their dominance of the industry will be diminished short of a major anti-
> trust breakup.
I
On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, "Jerry Feldman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's just a bump on the log. Microsoft will encounter more competition
> and may lose some market share to Linux and BSD, but I don't think that
> their dominance of the industry will be diminished short of a major anti-
> trust
That's just a bump on the log. Microsoft will encounter more competition
and may lose some market share to Linux and BSD, but I don't think that
their dominance of the industry will be diminished short of a major anti-
trust breakup.
On 18 Mar 2002 at 9:13, Ken D'Ambrosio wrote:
> I know that
I know that most everyone here has likely already read the Slashdot
story posted on Friday(?), but this page is filled with some really
juicy quotes. Methinks that MS has stubbed their toe, and that
Windows(tm) will shortly be a thing of the past:
http://www.net2.com/lindows/
-Ken
*
12 matches
Mail list logo
