Greg Dake wrote:
> Direct TV is in the process of being acquired by Broadband Wireless.
>
> http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/011029/dam031_1.html
I believe that the article is talking about a different company. They
are talking about "Entertainment Direct" .tv (as in the domain -
http://entertainmen
> > 2) Will not go out of business in six months
> >
> > Any idea what their financial picture looks like? Do they own their
> > own equipment, or do they resell Covad like the rest of the world does?
>
> I actually don't know the answer to this, but I will ask when I call
> tomorrow. As for th
Benjamin Scott wrote:
> There are two more characteristics of a DSL feed which are, arguably, more
> important:
>
> 1) Available in the subscriber's area
>
> Any idea on what kind of presence they have in the NH region? Do you have
> a URL for an online qualifier? Failing that, a phone nu
On Sat, 17 Nov 2001, Kenneth E. Lussier wrote:
> ... DirectTV bought Telocity ...
[...]
> 1) Static IP Addresses
> 2) Good spped
> 3) Linux friendly
> 4) Aloows me to run my own services
There are two more characteristics of a DSL feed which are, arguably, more
important:
1) Available in the s
> Direct TV DSL?
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Rodent of Unusual Size [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2001 4:54 PM
> >To: Greater New Hampshire Linux Users
> >Subject: Re: Linux Friendly aDSL
> >
> >
> >"Kenneth E
OK stupid question. Do they require getting Direct TV in order to get
Direct TV DSL?
>-Original Message-
>From: Rodent of Unusual Size [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2001 4:54 PM
>To: Greater New Hampshire Linux Users
>Subject: Re: Linu
"Kenneth E. Lussier" wrote:
>
> So, I set out to find a DSL provider in my area that met
> the following criteria:
>
> 1) Static IP Addresses
> 2) Good spped
> 3) Linux friendly
> 4) Aloows me to run my own services
>
> Ambitious, and a little unrealistic, I know. But, I have found one!!!
> (I
