Re: Streaming media (was: NHPR bitcasts)

2001-11-10 Thread Karl J. Runge
FWIW, here is a LUG that at least tries (tried?) to broadcast its meetings via multicast. I'm not saying it is easy, but at least it can be done, even on this small a scale. I agree the chances of multicast being used by the unwashed masses seems to be pretty slim, oh well. http://www.svlug.org

Re: Streaming media (was: NHPR bitcasts)

2001-11-10 Thread Benjamin Scott
On Sat, 10 Nov 2001, Philip M wrote: > Multicast is not used because it is a myth in the context of the > internet. I was afraid the answer was going to be something like that. *sigh* -- Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do n

Re: Streaming media (was: NHPR bitcasts)

2001-11-10 Thread Philip M
: "Greater NH Linux Users' Group" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2001 9:37 PM Subject: Streaming media (was: NHPR bitcasts) > On Tue, 6 Nov 2001, Jon Greenberg wrote: > > The economics of online audio distribution are the inverse of broadcast. > &g

Streaming media (was: NHPR bitcasts)

2001-11-10 Thread Benjamin Scott
On Tue, 6 Nov 2001, Jon Greenberg wrote: > The economics of online audio distribution are the inverse of broadcast. > In broadcast, whether we have 10 listeners or 100,000, the distribution > costs remain the same. In streaming, each listener increases our costs. The solution is, of course, mu